Author Topic: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?  (Read 7161 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Davel

Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« on: April 18, 2021, 12:29:33 PM »
Reasons why I think Wolters evidence may well be photo/video.

1. When asked if there was any DNA in the car Wolters was quite open....when asked if his evidence was photograhic he refused to answer.

2.In the first episode of the discovery programme Wolters actually said that the evidence could be something like video/photos.

3. In the second discovery episode it was said that none of the photos found at CBs abandoned factory related to Inga. Why not mention MM when the programme was about her.

4. Wolters has appealed for info re anyone with details about the inside of any dwelling used by CB. Why is this important. Could it be they have a photo of maddie inside a room and wish to see if it relates to CB.

5. Wolters has said he has evidence which SHOWS MM is no longer alive.

For those who think its impossible remember this is exactly what was found in the RUI Pedro case....a child who was abducted by  a paedophile in Portugal
« Last Edit: April 18, 2021, 12:48:26 PM by Davel »

Offline barrier

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2021, 01:09:48 PM »
There is nothing to suggest he has images of Madeleine, first and foremost who identified the image, it certainly isn't the parents nor I'd venture SY.

This is my own private domicile and I will not be harassed....



Offline Davel

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2021, 01:18:28 PM »
There is nothing to suggest he has images of Madeleine, first and foremost who identified the image, it certainly isn't the parents nor I'd venture SY.

I've shown points to suggest he may have photographic evidence. It would depend on the photo/video how difficult it would be to identify

Online Eleanor

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2021, 03:34:34 PM »
I've shown points to suggest he may have photographic evidence. It would depend on the photo/video how difficult it would be to identify

I am more inclined to believe that this is true.  And if so then it would prove Abduction.

Offline Davel

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2021, 03:44:48 PM »
I am more inclined to believe that this is true.  And if so then it would prove Abduction.

I think based on what he has said Wolters has proof of abduction but not proof CB is involved... But some evidence that implicates him

Online Eleanor

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2021, 04:01:21 PM »
I think based on what he has said Wolters has proof of abduction but not proof CB is involved... But some evidence that implicates him

I think you could well be right.  And Wolters is hardly pushed for time at the moment.

Offline Brietta

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #6 on: April 18, 2021, 04:29:44 PM »
I've shown points to suggest he may have photographic evidence. It would depend on the photo/video how difficult it would be to identify

I think it could be incredibly difficult even for the parents of a missing child to categorically make an identification based on photographic evidence alone.

For example, the child caught on CCTV in New Zealand was only ruled out by DNA so similar was she to Madeleine.  If memory serves me well I think she even had the same flaw in the iris of her eye.

Therefore I think Wolters has photographic evidence.  As a result of which I think he is sure that a child appears to have died and Brueckner is complicit in this.  But is the child Madeleine?

I think it is worthwhile waiting patiently to find out in the interest of Justice and I think that is precisely what he is doing. 
The remit of Operation Grange is to investigate ...  "(as if the abduction occurred in the UK)"

Offline Davel

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #7 on: April 18, 2021, 04:53:39 PM »
I think it could be incredibly difficult even for the parents of a missing child to categorically make an identification based on photographic evidence alone.

For example, the child caught on CCTV in New Zealand was only ruled out by DNA so similar was she to Madeleine.  If memory serves me well I think she even had the same flaw in the iris of her eye.

Therefore I think Wolters has photographic evidence.  As a result of which I think he is sure that a child appears to have died and Brueckner is complicit in this.  But is the child Madeleine?

I think it is worthwhile waiting patiently to find out in the interest of Justice and I think that is precisely what he is doing.

Depends if there was a closeup of the face. I dont see Wolters beig so definite if he wasnt sure

Offline Brietta

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #8 on: April 18, 2021, 06:19:52 PM »
Depends if there was a closeup of the face. I dont see Wolters beig so definite if he wasnt sure

Wolters doesn't have an axe to grind.  He is following the evidence exactly as it has been uncovered and like the Judicial Police and Scotland Yard before him has found absolutely nothing to implicate Madeleine's parents but has gone for stranger abduction.  He has the requisite evidence to back up his opinion.

I had overlooked the advances in digital technology which have taken place over the years.  "A facial recognition system is a technology capable of identifying or verifying a person from a digital image or a video frame from a video source." Wikipedia 
It is now an everyday tool in the box for police and one in which I am sure the BKA will have an expertise.

As you keep saying ~ we will just have to be patient and await events unfolding as they undoubtedly will.  But the focus of the investigation is now well and truly on Brueckner and most certainly not Madeleine's parents.
The remit of Operation Grange is to investigate ...  "(as if the abduction occurred in the UK)"

Offline Anthro

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #9 on: April 18, 2021, 06:46:24 PM »
I remember Mr Wolters saying that they have no forensic evidence such as Madeleine’s pyjamas. Why mention that as such? It leads me to think that they have photographic material of this but are unable to link to Brückner in particular.

Offline kizzy

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2021, 11:00:03 AM »
I've shown points to suggest he may have photographic evidence. It would depend on the photo/video how difficult it would be to identify

So, if that's the case why would wolt think it was Maddie.
sorry if offended but the mccs bring the worst out in me...Oh and apologies to Vs if there are spelling mistakes

Offline jassi

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #11 on: April 19, 2021, 11:39:10 AM »
So, if that's the case why would wolt think it was Maddie.

And of course if he has photographic evidence, why hasn't he shown it the McCanns for identification?
They are the ones who should best know if it's their daughter.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for this season.

Online Eleanor

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #12 on: April 19, 2021, 12:12:20 PM »

I've been thinking.  Yer yer, I know.  But, supposing Wolters has found a photo on a Porn Site.  It is not impossible to take a photo of a small child with her face in evidence and still alive while not quite clear.

It seems to me that some of you are desperate to discredit Wolters when if The McCanns were in the frame you would all be in there supporting him.

Offline jassi

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #13 on: April 19, 2021, 12:38:08 PM »
I've been thinking.  Yer yer, I know.  But, supposing Wolters has found a photo on a Porn Site.  It is not impossible to take a photo of a small child with her face in evidence and still alive while not quite clear.

It seems to me that some of you are desperate to discredit Wolters when if The McCanns were in the frame you would all be in there supporting him.

Surely if a photo is not quite clear, then any identification will be not quite clear either.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for this season.

Offline Davel

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #14 on: April 19, 2021, 12:46:04 PM »
So, if that's the case why would wolt think it was Maddie.

It may have a close up of Maddies face. The fact that Wolters wants information re the inside of any dwelling used by CB is a major clue. Many thing point to a photo being the evidence he has.... All my opinion but based on evidence
« Last Edit: April 19, 2021, 12:52:25 PM by Davel »