Shane Mitchell’s whereabouts during the course of the entire evening?

[Nicholas]

All those people choosing to back this innocence fraud grift have no idea where exactly killer Luke Mitchell was all night after he had committed his murder (apart from the sightings of witnesses who saw him at certain times), or where exactly  Corinne Mitchell was that night and what exactly she was doing

Same applies to former  Shane Mitchell

[Nicholas]

Still nothing on killer Luke Mitchell’s other missing bike - which without doubt him and his mother and brother would have been asked various questions about by the police

What was killer Luke Mitchell and Shane and Corinne Mitchell’s evidence regarding the push bikes?

And does anyone know what  Corinne Mitchell and  Shane Mitchell told the police about Kim Thomson?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/dec/31/1

Did the Mitchell’s ghost Kim T like the Hall family did with Stephanie Bon?

Part 9
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/05/12/quite-a-hall-tale-part-9%ef%b8%8f/

Part 9a
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/05/14/quite-a-hall-tale-part-9%ef%b8%8f-2/

Part 9b
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/05/20/quite-a-hall-tale-part-9c%ef%b8%8f/

[Nicholas]

I believe he can't speak out because he knows what happened

What does Shane Mitchell have to say about his  brother, mother Corinne Mitchell and Sandra Lean and Scott Forbes various smear campaigns over all these years?

”When toxic types can’t control the way you see yourself, they start to control how others see you; they play the martyr while you’re labeled the toxic one. A smear campaign is a preemptive strike to sabotage your reputation and slander your name so that you won’t have a support network to fall back on lest you decide to detach and cut ties with this toxic person. They may even stalk and harass you or the people you know as a way to supposedly “expose” the truth about you; this exposure acts as a way to hide their own abusive behavior while projecting it onto you.

Bringing in the opinion, perspective or suggested threat of another person into the dynamic of an interaction is known as “triangulation.” Often used to validate the toxic person’s abuse while invalidating the victim’s reactions to abuse, triangulation can also work to manufacture love triangles that leave you feeling unhinged and insecure.

Malignant narcissists love to triangulate their significant other with strangers, co-workers, ex-partners, friends and even family members in order to evoke jealousy and uncertainty in you. They also use the opinions of others to validate their point of view.

This is a diversionary tactic meant to pull your attention away from their abusive behavior and into a false image of them as a desirable, sought after person. It also leaves you questioning yourself – if Mary did agree with Tom, doesn’t that mean that you must be wrong? The truth is, narcissists love to “report back” falsehoods about others say about you, when in fact, they are the ones smearing you.
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8086.msg383172.html#msg383172

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell

Now Lamberton is having another go at Shanes memory. He states "Imagine folks,two days after the murder he couldn't even remember Luke making the dinner that afternoon"

Yes, imagine! 2 days after the murder? we were all shocked. We were all traumatised. Remembering whether his brother made dinner or not doesn't actually spring to mind as an important thing!

And again, their double standards......2 days after the murder AW couldn't remember what she was wearing!! You can't condem one for their memory and not the other

Yes, It was to turn into a very important thing afterwards but not 2 days afterwards. It is easy for those to condem......when they haven't been in that particular situation!

http://forum.wronglyaccusedperson.org.uk/series-on-cases-from-sandra-leans-book-no-smoke/the-lm-alibi-offered-at-trial-was-it-necessary-has-it-obstructed-justice/msg10824/#msg10824

Why would liar Shane Mitchell have been ‘traumatised’ ?

How many times did Shane Mitchell meet [Name removed]?

And what exactly did Shane tell police about the times he met [Name removed] - presuming he met her on the odd occasion

Shane Mitchell knew there were ‘errors’ in his first statements - at no time did Shane put these ‘errors’ down to being ‘traumatised’!

Shane Mitchell claimed he had memory problems due to previous drug addiction

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell

2 days after the murder AW couldn't remember what she was wearing!! You can't condem one for their memory and not the other

Corinne Mitchell did not/and does not appear to recognise the fact that [Name removed] was AW’s grand-daughter

whereas [Name removed] was a stranger to liar Shane Mitchell

Ergo AW’s emotions would have been very different to liar Shane Mitchell’s at that time

Liar Corinne Mitchell appeared to be suggesting her lying son Shane Mitchell’s memory of events were suppressed due to his emotions around that time

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell

Now Lamberton is having another go at Shanes memory. He states "Imagine folks,two days after the murder he couldn't even remember Luke making the dinner that afternoon"

Yes, imagine! 2 days after the murder? we were all shocked. We were all traumatised. Remembering whether his brother made dinner or not doesn't actually spring to mind as an important thing! And again, their double standards......2 days after the murder AW couldn't remember what she was wearing!! You can't condem one for their memory and not the other

Yes, It was to turn into a very important thing afterwards but not 2 days afterwards. It is easy for those to condem......when they haven't been in that particular situation!

Liar Corinne Mitchell appeared to be suggesting her lying son Shane Mitchell’s memory of events were suppressed due to his emotions around that time

This is the same Shane Mitchell who’s only involvement that day was alleged to have been giving his 14 year old brother his torch at around approximately 10:40pm that night

That’s it - according to the innocence fraud narrative

Did Shane Mitchell go to work on the Tuesday the 1st of July 2003?

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell - 8th April 2010

“there is no "black and white" answer to this question and not just one reason why we went with findlay to appeal.
We were in  complete shock at the guilty verdict. findlay assured us it would go to appeal. when you are in shock you don't think or act rationally”

Hmm

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean
GD gave an account of a "yellow framed push bike" against the school railings at the junction of the paths - no-one else - not the dog walkers, the cyclist, the young couple walking earlier, or even JF himself mentioned this bike. I'll continue this n my next post. https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg386888.html#msg386888

Would that be the same “young couple walking earlier” con artist Sandra Lean attempted to pretend was killer Luke Mitchell and [Name removed] here https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iCsiViNiPGA