The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.

[Venturi Swirl]

I have seen endless speculation that the police do indeed have evidence and are not guessing or just following their remit. Some, in fact, use the police involvement as evidence of a stranger abduction.

It's not speculation - it's what the police have told us.  You clearly choose to disbelieve every word they say, except when it suits you.

[Lace]

If a child of that young age goes missing and an extensive search is made and the child is not found.   Then the logical explanation would be abduction.

[jassi]

If a child of that young age goes missing and an extensive search is made and the child is not found.   Then the logical explanation would be abduction.

No, only a possible explanation.  Without proof it is merely an assumption. Which is what OG settled for.

[Lace]

No, only a possible explanation.  Without proof it is merely an assumption. Which is what OG settled for.

They didn't settle for a 'possible' explanation they settled for abduction.

[jassi]

They didn't settle for a 'possible' explanation they settled for abduction.

Aye, but only based on an opinion which was possibly  but not necessarily correct

[Wonderfulspam]

If a child of that young age goes missing and an extensive search is made and the child is not found.   Then the logical explanation would be abduction.

And that includes family and friends too.

[Wonderfulspam]

I have seen endless speculation that the police do indeed have evidence and are not guessing or just following their remit. Some, in fact, use the police involvement as evidence of a stranger abduction.

Yes, the police are investigating abduction. A criminal act by a stranger. Therefore there must have been an abductor, but there's still no sign of this abductor just yet. Only some incredibly flimsy, yet somehow concrete, evidence against the murderer apparently.

[jassi]

Yes, the police are investigating abduction. A criminal act by a stranger. Therefore there must have been an abductor, but there's still no sign of this abductor just yet. Only some incredibly flimsy, yet somehow concrete, evidence against the murderer apparently.

Who may not be a murderer anyway as there is the possibility that she is alive.

[Wonderfulspam]

Who may not be a murderer anyway as there is the possibility that she is alive.

Wolters did say there was still a little bit of hope. Then later he said there was no hope at all.
It's very conclusive, the evidence against Christian Brueckner. Much like the evidence Madeleine was taken in a criminal act by a stranger, for which no one can give any suggestions as to what it could possibly be. But it's most convincing, whatever it is.

[Lace]

That reminds me.

The Possible Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.

1) The McCanns claim that Madeleine was abducted.

2)The allegedly open window, that had Kate's prints on it.

Who stages an abduction by opening a window and leaving their finger prints on it?

[Wonderfulspam]

Who stages an abduction by opening a window and leaving their finger prints on it?

Perhaps someone who hastily stages an abduction? That's possible isn't it.
But can we return to the thread topic. Maybe you'd care to suggest what, the evidence Madeleine was taken in a criminal act by a stranger, could possibly be?
Please do, because I'm not getting many suggestions here, oddly enough.

[Wonderfulspam]

If a child of that young age goes missing and an extensive search is made and the child is not found.   Then the logical explanation would be abduction.

There was another possible, logical & plausible, explanation for that, you see.

[G-Unit]

It's not speculation - it's what the police have told us.  You clearly choose to disbelieve every word they say, except when it suits you.

Do you believe that the police always tell the truth to the public?

[Brietta]

An incredibly ludicrous thread at a time when there is an at least three pronged international police investigation currently taking place into a 2007 resident of Luz who fits a perfect profile (cept he's not dead -according to Amaral).

[Wonderfulspam]

An incredibly ludicrous thread at a time when there is an at least three pronged international police investigation currently taking place into a 2007 resident of Luz who fits a perfect profile (cept he's not dead -according to Amaral).

Yes, the case against Brueckner, & how is Wolters getting on with that? Having much joy is he?
No? Maybe that's because Madeleine just wasn't abducted. That's possible isn't it.