Author Topic: Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes  (Read 81315 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes
« Reply #975 on: March 21, 2023, 10:17:08 PM »
These alleged gas bottles Sandra Lean refers to as ‘exploding’ - do they link back to Corinne Mitchell?

And if so - why weren’t they disposed of safely before she left the premises?

Sandra Lean
Inka Oldmoot That was a very serious concern - there were a number of gas bottles in the caravan place (you could hear them exploding) and both businesses shared the same entrance - that's how close together they are. Also, there are houses directly across the road and the firefighters had to go in there, not knowing how many gas bottles there might be - or where they were. It was a very, very dangerous situation all round
In my opinion, there can be no way this was started "accidentally" - after the ghouls broke in several months ago, the place was open to the elements - we've had so much rain, snow and frost here, it would have been dripping with dampness inside and, of course, there was no power in the building. Also, the speed with which such a damp building, with no source of fire ignition, went up, indicates deliberate firestarting using an accelerant.
This is not speculation, just basic logic regarding the start and spread speed of fire in different conditions.



Why were these alleged gas bottles left behind ‘in the caravan place’ ?

And who will be responsible for leaving them behind?
« Last Edit: March 21, 2023, 10:24:16 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Parky41

Re: Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes
« Reply #976 on: March 21, 2023, 10:19:03 PM »
Sandra Lean
Carol Rice Mcmillan My thoughts exactly, Carol - I could hear the gas bottles exploding and I'm a good bit away, up the hill. Right next to a petrol station - and the firefighters whose lives are put in danger because they have no idea where all of the gas bottles are.


These alleged gas bottles Sandra Lean refers to as ‘exploding’ - do they link back to Corinne Mitchell?

And if so - why weren’t they disposed of safely before she left the premises?

Ok, the property inclusive of gas bottles is that of the previous tenant. Procedure is to correspond with the tenant and ask them to dispose of such property. If they fail to comply with this then they face being billed by the landlord if having to do this for them. So, until something can be produced that says the landlord had taken on responsibility for the disposal of shed, gas bottles, and everything else, then the fault lies with the previous tenant who may actually face a fine for this?

A tenant who erects out buildings in their garden can be fined if they fail to dismantle and take the outbuildings with them - No different from that shed on rented land and everything within it, or on that land. Still a caravan that the night watchman used to use there also?

The fire was deemed to not be arson - Something ignited and caused that shed to combust all at once, indicative of leaking gas perhaps over a period of time into a contained area? Certainly the locals speak of the whole thing ablaze at once?

So, perhaps Ms Lean can give people the full run down on who was supposed to deal with the shed, caravan, gas bottles and any other property? Was CM supposed to dispose and remove this and failed, or was she being billed by the landlord for them having to arrange this? In brief, was there an agreement in place?  - Then a fire destroys the lot??

Extremely lucky that NO one was hurt, not the emergency services, nor some unlucky youngsters should they have taken the notion to wander in there before it went boom? - What does one imagine would have happened then? Would it be the owner of the property or the landlord to be held liable? - Just a thought.


Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes
« Reply #977 on: March 21, 2023, 10:36:19 PM »
Ok, the property inclusive of gas bottles is that of the previous tenant. Procedure is to correspond with the tenant and ask them to dispose of such property. If they fail to comply with this then they face being billed by the landlord if having to do this for them. So, until something can be produced that says the landlord had taken on responsibility for the disposal of shed, gas bottles, and everything else, then the fault lies with the previous tenant who may actually face a fine for this?

A tenant who erects out buildings in their garden can be fined if they fail to dismantle and take the outbuildings with them - No different from that shed on rented land and everything within it, or on that land. Still a caravan that the night watchman used to use there also?

The fire was deemed to not be arson - Something ignited and caused that shed to combust all at once, indicative of leaking gas perhaps over a period of time into a contained area? Certainly the locals speak of the whole thing ablaze at once?

So, perhaps Ms Lean can give people the full run down on who was supposed to deal with the shed, caravan, gas bottles and any other property? Was CM supposed to dispose and remove this and failed, or was she being billed by the landlord for them having to arrange this? In brief, was there an agreement in place?  - Then a fire destroys the lot??

Extremely lucky that NO one was hurt, not the emergency services, nor some unlucky youngsters should they have taken the notion to wander in there before it went boom? - What does one imagine would have happened then? Would it be the owner of the property or the landlord to be held liable? - Just a thought.

Someone called ‘Ali’ has made the following comment on this news articles https://www.edinburghlive.co.uk/news/edinburgh-news/police-investigate-blaze-caravan-site-26504784#comments-wrapper

Ali
3 DAYS AGO
It didn't belong to her, it was rented from the council. And, she hasn't been near it for about ten years.



According to a Mags Wilson they believe Corinne Mitchell ‘still owned the premises’
👇

Shock video shows huge fire at caravan site once owned by evil killer Luke Mitchell’s mum
‘Video captured by local Mags Wilson shows the flames crackling in the dark night sky as citizens stand across the road from the mayhem unfolding, which all happened shortly after 7:30pm.
Gas canisters can be heard exploding in the video as the heat of the fire intensifies, sending plumes of smoke which were seen billowing as far as Edinburgh.
With concerns growing that the blaze may spill over to the petrol station across the road, Police Scotland and the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service rushed to the scene.
Scottish Fire and Rescue eventually opted to utilise a large mechanical ladder to fight the blaze from above and eventually managed to bring the three-hour-long fire under control.
Police have now confirmed there were no suspicious circumstances involved.
Speaking today Mags said: “I was standing opposite and was filming as it happened, it was once the office where Corrine Mitchell lived for a few years after Luke was convicted.
It was used as a caravan park and I believe she still owned the premises.
“I was very worried that the fire might spread across to the petrol station, eventually they [Scottish Fire and Rescue] brought in this massive ladder to tackle it.
“The police were just moving people back to keep them away from the fire and it was extremely lucky that nobody was hurt.”
Speaking today a Police Scotland spokesperson said: “Following enquiries into a fire at a disused building on Mayfield Road, Dalkeith, on the evening of Friday 17 March 2023, we can confirm that there were no suspicious circumstances.”
https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/10399750/fire-caravan-park-once-owned-luke-mitchell-mum/
« Last Edit: March 21, 2023, 10:56:37 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes
« Reply #978 on: March 21, 2023, 10:55:28 PM »
Ok, the property inclusive of gas bottles is that of the previous tenant. Procedure is to correspond with the tenant and ask them to dispose of such property. If they fail to comply with this then they face being billed by the landlord if having to do this for them. So, until something can be produced that says the landlord had taken on responsibility for the disposal of shed, gas bottles, and everything else, then the fault lies with the previous tenant who may actually face a fine for this?

A tenant who erects out buildings in their garden can be fined if they fail to dismantle and take the outbuildings with them - No different from that shed on rented land and everything within it, or on that land. Still a caravan that the night watchman used to use there also?

The fire was deemed to not be arson - Something ignited and caused that shed to combust all at once, indicative of leaking gas perhaps over a period of time into a contained area? Certainly the locals speak of the whole thing ablaze at once?

So, perhaps Ms Lean can give people the full run down on who was supposed to deal with the shed, caravan, gas bottles and any other property? Was CM supposed to dispose and remove this and failed, or was she being billed by the landlord for them having to arrange this? In brief, was there an agreement in place?  - Then a fire destroys the lot??

Extremely lucky that NO one was hurt, not the emergency services, nor some unlucky youngsters should they have taken the notion to wander in there before it went boom? - What does one imagine would have happened then? Would it be the owner of the property or the landlord to be held liable? - Just a thought.

Inka Oldmoot
Sandra Lean I googled and discovered there’s no offence of arson in Scotland but there is reckless/ intentional fire raising which has a maximum life sentence. It’s alarming that these buildings were so close together. As you point out there was a tangible risk to those close by- risk to life and property. Anyone responsible for setting the fire must have been aware of these risks. That’s very disturbing to think about. The blaze required five fire appliances. I’m not entirely sure casual vandalism could produce something on this scale. The media are reporting that police are investigating. They need to get these person into custody because based on their behaviour they have no concern for life. Anyone prepared to go to this extent is dangerous to the public.
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes
« Reply #979 on: March 21, 2023, 11:31:08 PM »
Ok, the property inclusive of gas bottles is that of the previous tenant. Procedure is to correspond with the tenant and ask them to dispose of such property. If they fail to comply with this then they face being billed by the landlord if having to do this for them. So, until something can be produced that says the landlord had taken on responsibility for the disposal of shed, gas bottles, and everything else, then the fault lies with the previous tenant who may actually face a fine for this?

A tenant who erects out buildings in their garden can be fined if they fail to dismantle and take the outbuildings with them - No different from that shed on rented land and everything within it, or on that land. Still a caravan that the night watchman used to use there also?

The fire was deemed to not be arson - Something ignited and caused that shed to combust all at once, indicative of leaking gas perhaps over a period of time into a contained area? Certainly the locals speak of the whole thing ablaze at once?

So, perhaps Ms Lean can give people the full run down on who was supposed to deal with the shed, caravan, gas bottles and any other property? Was CM supposed to dispose and remove this and failed, or was she being billed by the landlord for them having to arrange this? In brief, was there an agreement in place?  - Then a fire destroys the lot??

Extremely lucky that NO one was hurt, not the emergency services, nor some unlucky youngsters should they have taken the notion to wander in there before it went boom? - What does one imagine would have happened then? Would it be the owner of the property or the landlord to be held liable? - Just a thought.

Perhaps you can firstly explain to us why you think it is any of your business? If Corrine failed to act within the law that is for her and the authorities. Neither you nor anyone else is entitled to ‘the full run down’ as you call it. You conceal your identity and poke from a safe distance. Coward.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2023, 11:40:06 PM by faithlilly »
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline KenMair

Re: Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes
« Reply #980 on: March 26, 2023, 08:19:22 PM »
Detective Fibs back in various Sunday papers this weekend as "lawyer Scott Forbes". Even Dalkeith's leading criminologist confirmed he didn't finish his traineeship or attain the necessary diploma to practice law.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes
« Reply #981 on: March 26, 2023, 08:44:02 PM »
Detective Fibs back in various Sunday papers this weekend as "lawyer Scott Forbes". Even Dalkeith's leading criminologist confirmed he didn't finish his traineeship or attain the necessary diploma to practice law.

According to Ashlie McAnally for the mail on Sunday

The jury heard evidence that Mitchell had bought a knife online, which was never found

Is she referring to the black handled knife Corinne Mitchell bought her killer son for Christmas from a catalogue or is Ashlie McAnally claiming the missing brown handled Jack Pyke knife was purchased ‘online’ ?

 *&^^&
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes
« Reply #982 on: March 26, 2023, 08:47:39 PM »
Detective Fibs back in various Sunday papers this weekend as "lawyer Scott Forbes". Even Dalkeith's leading criminologist confirmed he didn't finish his traineeship or attain the necessary diploma to practice law.

Excerpt by Sarah Peddie for the Scottish Sun

The stored forensic items include at least 10 swab samples taken from Jodi's face, hands, breasts and back - the places confirmed as having the presence of bodily fluids.

Criminologist Dr Sandra Lean said: "We expect fairness from our justice system. In this case, we've seen everything but fairness.

"To discover now that there were samples which could have identified the real murderer is beyond comprehension.

"A 14-year-old girl was murdered and, rather than concentrate their efforts on finding who was responsible, they focused on her boyfriend - failing, as a result, to pursue forensic evidence that could not only have identified the real killer but exonerated Luke Mitchell."


 *&^^&
« Last Edit: March 26, 2023, 08:50:41 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes
« Reply #983 on: March 29, 2023, 07:17:00 PM »
Excerpt by Sarah Peddie for the Scottish Sun

The stored forensic items include at least 10 swab samples taken from Jodi's face, hands, breasts and back - the places confirmed as having the presence of bodily fluids.

Criminologist Dr Sandra Lean said: "We expect fairness from our justice system. In this case, we've seen everything but fairness.

"To discover now that there were samples which could have identified the real murderer is beyond comprehension.

"A 14-year-old girl was murdered and, rather than concentrate their efforts on finding who was responsible, they focused on her boyfriend - failing, as a result, to pursue forensic evidence that could not only have identified the real killer but exonerated Luke Mitchell."


 *&^^&

How would any of the samples ‘have identified the real murderer’ ?

 *&^^&

Sandra Lean has never mentioned any of the jogger witnesses in the area around the time as far as I’m aware

The Sunday Mail can reveal that the samples were the reason joggers were asked to provide DNA samples last week ~ 2003.
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes
« Reply #984 on: April 01, 2023, 12:11:56 AM »
Ruddy McCleod: “I have led a sheltered lifeI have however I have never heard anyone walking 500 metres putting a condom on to crack one off”

This above all came from creep Roddy’s mind

Sandra Lean: “well the following morning when he heard that a girls body had been found behind the wall he goes back out on the path behind another tree and does the same again”

They (Roddy & Sandra) are creeps - as is Scott Forbes
« Last Edit: April 01, 2023, 12:20:10 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes
« Reply #985 on: April 01, 2023, 12:19:20 AM »
Ruddy McCleod: “I have led a sheltered lifeI have however I have never heard anyone walking 500 metres putting a condom on to crack one off”

This above all came from creep Roddy’s mind

Sandra Lean: “well the following morning when he heard that a girls body had been found behind the wall he goes back out on the path behind another tree and does the same again”

They (Roddy & Sandra) are creeps - as is Scott Forbes

Aren’t they simply stating facts?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes
« Reply #986 on: April 01, 2023, 12:23:05 AM »
Ruddy McCleod: “I have led a sheltered lifeI have however I have never heard anyone walking 500 metres putting a condom on to crack one off”

This above all came from creep Roddy’s mind

Creep 👆🏽

James Falconer appears to have been having sexual intercourse with A N Other

No one has seen what he said in his witness statement and Sandra Lean is NOT a trusted source

There was however a valid reason why Donald Findlay dropped James Falconer like a hot potatoe in 2006

Mitchell witness 'get-rich scheme'.

Yesterday, Mr Findlay told judges that he was dropping any further claims about Mr Falconer.

https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Mitchell+witness+%27get-rich+scheme%27.-a0174739290
« Last Edit: April 01, 2023, 12:31:14 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes
« Reply #987 on: April 01, 2023, 12:30:27 AM »
Sandra Lean: “well the following morning when he heard that a girls body had been found behind the wall he goes back out on the path behind another tree and does the same again”

There is no evidence that James Falconer even knew psychopathic sadist Luke Mitchell had murdered by ‘the following morning’
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes
« Reply #988 on: April 01, 2023, 12:35:01 AM »
James Falconer appears to have been having sexual intercourse with A N Other

No one has seen what he said in his witness statement and Sandra Lean is NOT a trusted source

There was however a valid reason why Donald Findlay dropped James Falconer like a hot potatoe

Why?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Luke Mitchell - Witness Scott Forbes
« Reply #989 on: April 01, 2023, 12:36:31 AM »
There is no evidence that James Falconer even knew psychopathic sadist Luke Mitchell had murdered by ‘the following morning’

Are you really saying that he couldn’t see the police activity from his house the next morning?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?