More recent events related to Madeleine McCann's case

[Eleanor]

It is an entirely illogical question as whether or not Brückner has been quetstioned has absolutely nothing to do why why someone might consider him capable of murder.  And it’s not as if he’s going to explain what did or didn’t mske him a murderer when questioned anyway.  He could deny it, tell us he’s a kind and gentle man that was busy knitting stump socks for lepers that night, it doesn’t mean he’s telling the truth.

The German Prosecution Service will get Nothing from Brueckner   I mean, would you if you were him.  I certainly wouldn't.  I would advise him to keep his mouth shut.

Although it might or might not do him any good.  I don't know how The German Prosecution Service works.  I spent far too much time wondering about The Portuguese Prosecution Service.  And where did that get me?

You see, I really don't want to go into The War.  But it does matter.  And I haven't yet sussed  just how much when it comes to crimes of paedophillia.  Or even if this happened.

Brueckner may not be allowed to be found guilty just because he is German. Or am I the only one who has thought about this?

[Eleanor]

Yes he raped & tortured someone in 2005, but that was a long time ago now & we can't hold it against him indefinitely.

It doesn't necessarily make him a bad person, we all make mistakes.

And you are an arsehole.  Poor old you.

[Brietta]

"If we had a video of the act or a picture of Madeleine dead with Brueckner on camera, we wouldn’t have had to make a public appeal. But we only have circumstantial evidence"

There is a thought provoking analysis of the first sentence of that statement on the current McCann thread on Websleuths.
I recommend it to members.

[Eleanor]

"If we had a video of the act or a picture of Madeleine dead with Brueckner on camera, we wouldn’t have had to make a public appeal. But we only have circumstantial evidence"

There is a thought provoking analysis of the first sentence of that statement on the current McCann thread on Websleuths.
I recommend it to members.

And therein lies the problem.  It simply isn't good enough.

We all fought for The McCanns on more or less than this.  And I don't need Websleuths to tell me the difference.

Brueckner at least deserves the same consideration.  So Wolters can piss off.  Until he can come up with something else.

No,  I don't like Brueckner very much at all.  But I have no reason to believe that he murdered Madeleine.

And nor do I believe that The McCanns did either.

Take your pick.  I can't be blaming someone when I don't even know.  But some of you can.  Think on that.  You absolutely disgust me.  I will never understand who you are.

[Mr Gray]

Surely anyone saying they believe Wolters has solved the case is agreeing Brueckner is a murderer, aren't they?

You are making an assumption and are totally wrong.
Afaiac Wolters can prive MM was abducted and murdered.
That to me is solving the case.  John has, said it's a mystery that may never be solved... I'm confident from everything that has been said that Wolters has solved the mystery..
Whether CB is the perp we don't know... But if you clsim he is innocent you are showing your ignorance.  He may or may not be innocent.  Even a court with all the evidence may not be able to answer that question... Whatever verdict they arrive at. You pontificate on CBs innocence a rights to sue.... Again you are showing your ignorance if the law.

I will preempt your question... Are the McCanbs innocent. My opinion is they are... But it's not an established fact

[barrier]

"If we had a video of the act or a picture of Madeleine dead with Brueckner on camera, we wouldn’t have had to make a public appeal. But we only have circumstantial evidence"

There is a thought provoking analysis of the first sentence of that statement on the current McCann thread on Websleuths.
I recommend it to members.

Exactly, there is nothing to link CB apart from him supposedly being in Luz, (so were others )and his mate saying CB confessed in a bar, maybe Wolters needs to get CB pissed to get him to talk.

[barrier]

And therein lies the problem.  It simply isn't good enough.

We all fought for The McCanns on more or less than this.  And I don't need Websleuths to tell me the difference.

Brueckner at least deserves the same consideration.  So Wolters can piss off.  Until he can come up with something else.

No,  I don't like Brueckner very much at all.  But I have no reason to believe that he murdered Madeleine.

And nor do I believe that The McCanns did either.

Take your pick.  I can't be blaming someone when I don't even know.  But some of you can.  Think on that.  You absolutely disgust me.  I will never understand who you are.

Spot on.

[Mr Gray]

And therein lies the problem.  It simply isn't good enough.

We all fought for The McCanns on more or less than this.  And I don't need Websleuths to tell me the difference.

Brueckner at least deserves the same consideration.  So Wolters can piss off.  Until he can come up with something else.

No,  I don't like Brueckner very much at all.  But I have no reason to believe that he murdered Madeleine.

And nor do I believe that The McCanns did either.

Take your pick.  I can't be blaming someone when I don't even know.  But some of you can.  Think on that.  You absolutely disgust me.  I will never understand who you are.

I think there is every reason to believe that CB may have murdered Maddie.... Thats a reasonable statement based on the known facts. ..and protected by my right to free speech... Because it's, reasonable and supported by evidence

Brietta's cite is out of context. 

[Venturi Swirl]

But he must be presumed innocent.

So yes, we can only presume he was busy darning when Maddie disappeared.

Unless we can prove otherwise of course.

Just like you are always presuming the McCanns are innocent and were both frantic with worry having just discovered Madeleine missing  when the Smiths sighting occurred you mean?

[Mr Gray]

Exactly, there is nothing to link CB apart from him supposedly being in Luz, (so were others )and his mate saying CB confessed in a bar, maybe Wolters needs to get CB pissed to get him to talk.

You are making an assumption and presenting it a fact.. Briettas quote is a newspaper report and out of context.  In real life Wolters has, said he has concrete evidence that CB murdered Maddie.  He also says he now has sufficient evidence to charge... That implies, hes collected more since his initial announcement

[G-Unit]

I think there is every reason to believe that CB may have murdered Maddie.... Thats a reasonable statement based on the known facts. ..and protected by my right to free speech... Because it's, reasonable and supported by evidence

Brietta's cite is out of context.

It may or may not be supported by evidence, but not by any evidence publicly available. Unless you count the pronouncements of Wolters as evidence, that is.

[Mr Gray]

It may or may not be supported by evidence, but not by any evidence publicly available. Unless you count the pronouncements of Wolters as evidence, that is.

The statements by Wolters are evidence... If you understand what evidence is

[Mr Gray]

It may or may not be supported by evidence, but not by any evidence publicly available. Unless you count the pronouncements of Wolters as evidence, that is.

My opinion is supported by publicly available evidence

[Wonderfulspam]

And you are an arsehole.  Poor old you.

I think you'll find personal insults aren't permitted under forum rules.

Why hasn't this unwarranted attack been dealt with by the moderators?

[jassi]

The German Prosecution Service will get Nothing from Brueckner   I mean, would you if you were him.  I certainly wouldn't.  I would advise him to keep his mouth shut.

Although it might or might not do him any good.  I don't know how The German Prosecution Service works.  I spent far too much time wondering about The Portuguese Prosecution Service.  And where did that get me?

You see, I really don't want to go into The War.  But it does matter.  And I haven't yet sussed  just how much when it comes to crimes of paedophillia.  Or even if this happened.

Brueckner may not be allowed to be found guilty just because he is German. Or am I the only one who has thought about this?

An interesting thought. The Germans were happy enough to convict him for other crimes - why would this be an exception?

Would you care to expand further on your thoughts ?