As identified by forensics. I have no reason to dispute them.
Did "forensics" draw up the diagram? I thought the author was unknown?
"Forensics" haven't identified which casings pertain to each of June and NB? "Forensics" have lumped together DRH 3, 4, 7, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 and 43 under the heading "Ralph and June first episode" with a question mark by DRH 13 and 14 "June second episode". "Forensics" have associated exited/spent bullets 5, 9, 35 and 35 all with June. The pathologist identified 7 entry gsw's and 3 exit gsw's on June. He also identified a bruise/graze to June's chest possibly caused by a bullet ricochet but it appears inconclusive whether this was a bullet ricochet from an entry/exit wound or an 8th gsw effectively a graze only wound unrelated to any entry/exit wounds. If you stand by the diagram then this means all 4 spent bullets pertain to June's gsw's and is a problem for the guilty camp in terms of the spent bullet relating to NB's graze wound to his elbow/chest and a total of 8 casings need allocating to June.