UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧
Disappeared and Abducted Children and Young Adults => Madeleine McCann (3) disappeared from her parent's holiday apartment at Ocean Club, Praia da Luz, Portugal on 3 May 2007. No trace of her has ever been found. => Topic started by: Holly Goodhead on December 28, 2019, 10:08:29 AM
-
1. Mrs Fenn lived permanently above 5A and was only metres away from MM when she disappeared on 3rd May why did you not take a statement from this person until 20th August 2007?
2. MW operated a night crèche which catered for OC guests scattered over PDL. Therefore the sight of parents carrying children around resort at night was to be expected. Why did you not seek to identify who was using night crèche on 3rd May and follow up with families concerned in an attempt to eliminate sightings of men carrying small girls by a British and Irish tourists?
-
Just what is expected of SY.
-
Just what is expected of SY.
Off Topic ... if you read the thread title.
Don't you think your immediate deflection both precipitate and smacking of desperation ?
-
Off Topic ... if you read the thread title.
Don't you think your immediate deflection both precipitate and smacking of desperation ?
Why shouldn't the PJ be asked about Operation Grange?
-
Off Topic ... if you read the thread title.
Don't you think your immediate deflection both precipitate and smacking of desperation ?
I can read,I'm sure you'll be surprised about that revelation,but the thread title is questions for PJ,they are after all the lead investigators,its you that is deflecting.
-
Why shouldn't the PJ be asked about Operation Grange?
You really are persistent and still OT.
I am reading the thread title which says ... "Questions For PJ!"
Might I respectfully request that you open another thread entitled ... "Questions For SY! if you wish to abide by forum rules and avoid the chaos engendered by posting deflection.
-
What do you think you could have achieved with an additional £12 million of funding and the full mite of one of the oldest and most prestigious police force in the world, bearing in mind the ongoing abject failure of SY with those resources?
-
Do you think Operation Grange have moved the investigation on during the eight years they have been involved in the case?
-
Where did those photos of the pyjamas come from?
-
Do you think this case will ever be brought to court?
-
1. Mrs Fenn lived permanently above 5A and was only metres away from MM when she disappeared on 3rd May why did you not take a statement from this person until 20th August 2007?
2. MW operated a night crèche which catered for OC guests scattered over PDL. Therefore the sight of parents carrying children around resort at night was to be expected. Why did you not seek to identify who was using night crèche on 3rd May and follow up with families concerned in an attempt to eliminate sightings of men carrying small girls by a British and Irish tourists?
What makes you think none of this was done Holly? You do realise the police speak to people but it isn't recorded formally??
What you read in the files is merely the tip of the iceberg wrt the knowledge gleamed by the police and that is why the PJ officers who were there in the days following Maddie's disappearance will always have the advantage over SY.
-
What makes you think none of this was done Holly? You do realise the police speak to people but it isn't recorded formally??
What you read in the files is merely the tip of the iceberg wrt the knowledge gleamed by the police and that is why the PJ officers who were there in the days following Maddie's disappearance will always have the advantage over SY.
the PJ who were there...didnt understand the evidence...its on record
-
the PJ who were there...didnt understand the evidence...its on record
I disagree. They were there, SY wasn't.
-
I disagree. They were there, SY wasn't.
its on record they didnt understand the evidence...I can give a cite if you wish
-
its on record they didnt understand the evidence...I can give a cite if you wish
....nah, it's off topic.
-
Are the McCanns still your number one suspects as some people still believe?
-
For Snr Gonzo (top sleuth): how do you feel knowing the public supported you to the tune of over £50k in less than 6 months to assist in funding your brave legal battle?
-
For Snr Gonzo (top sleuth): how do you feel knowing the public supported you to the tune of over £50k in less than 6 months to assist in funding your brave legal battle?
Could his answer be... There's one born every minute
-
Could his answer be... There's one born every minute
I wasn't asking you.
-
I wasn't asking you.
My reply wasn't specifically to you... It's a discussion forum
-
My reply wasn't specifically to you... It's a discussion forum
Ah, my apologies.
-
Ah, my apologies.
You're such a gent
-
For Snr Gonzo (top sleuth): how do you feel knowing the public supported you to the tune of over £50k in less than 6 months to assist in funding your brave legal battle?
Can you please stop referring to Senor Doctor Gonzalo Amaral as Gonzo - it’s highly offensive (to muppets).
-
Can you please stop referring to Senor Doctor Gonzalo Amaral as Gonzo - it’s highly offensive (to muppets).
You'd know.
-
You'd know.
Wrong. I am not a muppet, I am a Disney character. Now kindly cease with your offensive name calling and comparisons..
-
You really are persistent and still OT.
I am reading the thread title which says ... "Questions For PJ!"
Might I respectfully request that you open another thread entitled ... "Questions For SY! if you wish to abide by forum rules and avoid the chaos engendered by posting deflection.
Might I respectfully request you read and delete those who do not abide by forum rules and to avoid the chaos engendered by posting deflection as is seen in posts #17:24 on this thread.
Thank you.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Back on topic...
Question for the PJ: and NOT questions for supporters as they do not know the answers.
1.What was the one thing or combination of things that you found yourself not believing the Tapas group and the Parents version of events?
2.And why do you think the parents insist that their daughter did not leave via the unlocked door.
-
Might I respectfully request you read and delete those who do not abide by forum rules and to avoid the chaos engendered by posting deflection as is seen in posts #17:24 on this thread.
Thank you.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Back on topic...
Question for the PJ: and NOT questions for supporters as they do not know the answers.
1.What was the one thing or combination of things that you found yourself not believing the Tapas group and the Parents version of events?
2.And why do you think the parents insist that their daughter did not leave via the unlocked door.
No sense of humour, some people.
WE already have an answer to question one - it's basically the entire premise to the book entitled "The Truth Of The Lie" - perhaps you should read it if you want to know the answers.
Question 2 is best addressed to the parents - how are the PJ supposed to answer it, unless you want them to speculate?
-
No sense of humour, some people.
WE already have an answer to question one - it's basically the entire premise to the book entitled "The Truth Of The Lie" - perhaps you should read it if you want to know the answers.
Question 2 is best addressed to the parents - how are the PJ supposed to answer it, unless you want them to speculate?
Oh they do not need to speculate at all. Just look for evidence and proof that this was indeed the entry and exit. AND then ask them to explain the physics of it all. Simples.
-
Oh they do not need to speculate at all. Just look for evidence and proof that this was indeed the entry and exit. AND then ask them to explain the physics of it all. Simples.
The physics of a small child not being able to leave via the unlocked door? I don’t think that really need involve scientific explanation.
-
The physics of a small child not being able to leave via the unlocked door? I don’t think that really need involve scientific explanation.
Oh But it doesn't. The parents made a claim about a window and abduction without showing how that could have been achieved ,but dismissed out of hand a child leaving via an unlocked door which would have been easily achieved.
The question was for the PJ, not you anyway.
-
Oh But it doesn't. The parents made a claim about a window and abduction without showing how that could have been achieved ,but dismissed out of hand a child leaving via an unlocked door which would have been easily achieved.
The question was for the PJ, not you anyway.
Only a complete idiot of a policeman would claim that entering an unlocked groundfloor apartment and taking a child would be physically impossible for someone with criminal intent, but then again we are talking about the PJ, so..,