UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧
Alleged Miscarriages of Justice => Luke Mitchell and the murder of his teenage girfriend Jodi Jones on 30 June 2003. => Topic started by: John on March 02, 2021, 12:56:30 PM
-
It seems that Sandra Lean's Facebook account has been temporarily blocked, could this have anything to do with book sales?
https://mobile.twitter.com/SandraLean5/status/1366688002932678657
-
It seems that Sandra Lean's Facebook account has been temporarily blocked, could this have anything to do with book sales?
https://mobile.twitter.com/SandraLean5/status/1366688002932678657
No it wont be connected to the book sales, probably just the number of posts. It happens to everyone especially if you run groups on there
-
It seems that Sandra Lean's Facebook account has been temporarily blocked, could this have anything to do with book sales?
https://mobile.twitter.com/SandraLean5/status/1366688002932678657
Probably because she used the book on her header
-
It seems that Sandra Lean's Facebook account has been temporarily blocked, could this have anything to do with book sales?
https://mobile.twitter.com/SandraLean5/status/1366688002932678657
IMO she’s a grifter - nothing would surprise me
-
No it wont be connected to the book sales, probably just the number of posts. It happens to everyone especially if you run groups on there
I run groups and I've never been blocked?
-
I run groups and I've never been blocked?
Is she inciting others maybe?
-
I run groups and I've never been blocked?
I do too and I have been and so have other admins. Sometimes you can be blocked just by posting 4 or 5 things straight after each other
-
i dont imagine posting antivaccine misinformation all year will have helped
-
i dont imagine posting antivaccine misinformation all year will have helped
Who? Sandra Lean?
-
Who? Sandra Lean?
yes
-
yes
Oh dear, she plummets further in my estimation.
-
There's some vaccine "skeptic" nonsense on her Twitter too:
- https://mobile.twitter.com/SandraLean5/status/1305955313607208960
- https://mobile.twitter.com/SandraLean5/status/1326950290294181889
I've never seen the Facebook group but given how much slanderous looking material I've seen her followers post on Twitter, I wouldn't be surprised if that was a factor in the Facebook ban.
-
It’s back up now. She’s got about a thousand new followers too.
-
There's some vaccine "skeptic" nonsense on her Twitter too:
- https://mobile.twitter.com/SandraLean5/status/1305955313607208960
- https://mobile.twitter.com/SandraLean5/status/1326950290294181889
I've never seen the Facebook group but given how much slanderous looking material I've seen her followers post on Twitter, I wouldn't be surprised if that was a factor in the Facebook ban.
Oh dear, not another vaccine sceptic. I had mine several weeks ago and it is great.
-
It’s back up now. She’s got about a thousand new followers too.
She claimed on Twitter that she couldn't post on the site and as there are no current posts it can only be true.
-
She claimed on Twitter that she couldn't post on the site and as there are no current posts it can only be true.
What name is she using now, she has so many? @)(++(*
-
She claimed on Twitter that she couldn't post on the site and as there are no current posts it can only be true.
Sorry, I thought you meant the page had been removed.
-
Angelo 222, I have lost count. How many does the Dr have now? I can't remember them all!
-
Angelo 222, I have lost count. How many does the Dr have now? I can't remember them all!
Most of us are using fake names. So what?
-
Most of us are using fake names. So what?
How many of us are doing our best to be opinion makers.
-
Most of us are using fake names. So what?
Honesty? - There's an art of deceit is there not in using multiple profiles, of having to switch between characters. Each enacting out different roles. To consistently disrupt discussions when the topic is leaning towards those clear areas of guilt upon LM? - Reason as to why many people mention those many pseudonyms.
Honesty also in the denial of using certain ones. It may just be simple forgetfulness of course?
But for many it is seen as the need to have control in all that is being put out about this case. - And it has morphed into Ms Leans case - has it not?
-
Honesty? - There's an art of deceit is there not in using multiple profiles, of having to switch between characters. Each enacting out different roles. To consistently disrupt discussions when the topic is leaning towards those clear areas of guilt upon LM? - Reason as to why many people mention those many pseudonyms.
Honesty also in the denial of using certain ones. It may just be simple forgetfulness of course?
But for many it is seen as the need to have control in all that is being put out about this case. - And it has morphed into Ms Leans case - has it not?
It has, but it shouldn't have done. Nor is it all SL's fault, but also the fault of those who use forums to constantly run her down, and also the fault of some of her "campaigners".
I wish she had just written her book, and left the campaigning/demos/podcasts, etc alone, but that's just my opinion.
As for multiple fake names, well, I don't ALWAYS call myself mrswah on social media----------------!
-
It has, but it shouldn't have done. Nor is it all SL's fault, but also the fault of those who use forums to constantly run her down, and also the fault of some of her "campaigners".
I wish she had just written her book, and left the campaigning/demos/podcasts, etc alone, but that's just my opinion.
As for multiple fake names, well, I don't ALWAYS call myself mrswah on social media----------------!
I am Brietta when I post here and I post nowhere else. But were I posting elsewhere I would almost certainly use Brietta particularly if it was McCann related.
Were I to post elsewhere on different subject matter, I would probably would use another pseudonym so that my Brietta persona did not influence other posters who might be familiar with the name.
But I am not an influencer or running campaigns for a specific purpose to influence events. In those circumstances I think it is dishonest to run multiple identities each one backing up the other.
If Ms Lean choses to use multiple identities that is her privilege but my opinion is that if one is signing a petition for example once is enough - but if one signs it under fifty other names the petition is devalued and not a true reflection and yeah ... basically dishonest.
And I do not trust dishonesty.
-
I am Brietta when I post here and I post nowhere else. But were I posting elsewhere I would almost certainly use Brietta particularly if it was McCann related.
Were I to post elsewhere on different subject matter, I would probably would use another pseudonym so that my Brietta persona did not influence other posters who might be familiar with the name.
But I am not an influencer or running campaigns for a specific purpose to influence events. In those circumstances I think it is dishonest to run multiple identities each one backing up the other.
If Ms Lean choses to use multiple identities that is her privilege but my opinion is that if one is signing a petition for example once is enough - but if one signs it under fifty other names the petition is devalued and not a true reflection and yeah ... basically dishonest.
And I do not trust dishonesty.
Has Dr Lean signed a petition multiple times under multiple names or are you trying to gaslight Brietta?
-
What name is she using now, she has so many? @)(++(*
How many fake profiles does the Dr have?
I have lost count