This forum is on its last legs Sadie. Some migrated to Websleuths and some just don’t post anymore, one could hazard a guess as to why but I doubt it’s because they’ve been threatened. I’ve certainly not been threatened for many years, not since posting on Twitter at any rate. Given umpteen warnings on here yes, threatened no.
Eleanor's blog is still up and running... she just hasn't posted anything since last December, and might explain the reason, if you're patient.
Eleanor has been badly treated with her blog being closed.
Eleanor's blog is still up and running... she just hasn't posted anything since last December, and might explain the reason, if you're patient.
I haven't been able to access my Blog to write since last December, no matter what I do. But all Blogs from the beginning are still there and accessible to read. Some 17 years of them. Yes, I do still miss it, but nothing works. And so I have given up. WordPress is ignoring me.I thought running your blog was free, but Wordpress (now) charge a variable fee according to this...
I thought running your blog was free, but Wordpress (now) charge a variable fee according to this...
https://wordpress.com/pricing/ (https://wordpress.com/pricing/)
Have you stopped payments?
If not, maybe there's something wrong with your settings? This might help (or addle your brain)...
https://www.elegantthemes.com/blog/wordpress/common-wordpress-login-issues#2-cache-and-cookies (https://www.elegantthemes.com/blog/wordpress/common-wordpress-login-issues#2-cache-and-cookies)
[/quote
I've never been asked to pay anything during all the years; And never had a problem.
I have tried most of the suggestions you presented but never get anywhere, just a blank page. And I have changed my password three times, still with a blank page. I delete my cookies regularly.
But thanks for trying. xx
I've never been asked to pay anything during all the years; And never had a problem.If you're intent on running a blog (horrible word) why not start a new free one with a different title but still using Wordpress? Then you could probably provide a link to all your previous posts in the old one from there. Failing that, how about joining a Doxie appreciation club?...
I have tried most of the suggestions you presented but never get anywhere, just a blank page. And I have changed my password three times, still with a blank page. I delete my cookies regularly.
But thanks for trying. xx
If you're intent on running a blog (horrible word) why not start a new free one with a different title but still using Wordpress? Then you could probably provide a link to all your previous posts in the old one from there. Failing that, how about joining a Doxie appreciation club?...
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=dachshund+forum (https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=dachshund+forum)
Brietta was threatened in some way some months ago and I commented on it on forum, if you remember.
Davel business was repeatedly threatened on forum. Npne of you noticed it, but I did because of knowledge I had about him and where his business was located.
Eleanor has been badly treated with her blog being closed.
Also her exact address on Google Earth shown on forum. Now that is a definite no go. It prabably will be vanished now.
Me, too many things have happened to me to even attempt to list them. A few are on forum, but most are at home znd if I listed them, you wouldn't believe me; they are so bizarre
Do hope that Brie is OKWARNING
Never disxlose your name, personal details, address, phone numberm email address etc. on the forum. Some strange folk around if you are a Mccann supporter
I think maybe she might have died of embarrassment. Because if I had spent the best part of 6 years saying Brueckner would be charged one day & kept coming up empty handed I don't think I'd be able to show my face again either.
Even though you rant and rave it was Gerry the Smiths saw. Don't see the McCann's getting charged actually I don't see the McCann's getting investigated unlike Brueckner.
You're right. Mark Rowley has admitted that the only force that investigated the McCanns is the original PJ Investigation. SY ruled the McCanns out, without actually investigating them, according to the head of the MET.
Slightly strange way to carry out a very serious missing persons Investigation, wouldn't you Say?
The Portuguese investigated they were happy with that.
The Met had the entire PJ files properly translated so that they could throw the whole lot in the bin unread presumably
The very same files that WUMs and trolls and Conspiracy Theorists base their McCanns Dunnit theories on have been properly translated, read and scrutinized for follow up leads but apparently despite the fact that Met read all about the buttons and the PJs and the nipple twiddling they couldn?t immediately go and arrest the McCanns because David Cameron told them not to. So that?s why they had to invent a stranger abductor. Stands to reason when you think about it.
Yes, silly me for thinking that the Met would be able to read the same files as the troll and come to a different conclusion about what happened to Madeleine. Obviously if they had read the files they could only have come to one conclusion and that is that The McCanns dunnit. This proves that despite claiming they translated and analysed all 35000 pages, the Met obviously lied. and just spent all 13 years and ?14 million on playing golf and stuff instead.
The Portuguese, who couldn't rule them out. So you're saying SY were able to rule out the McCanns, because the Portuguese didn't. Have you ever listened to yourself at all?
They were ruled out it was Amaral who wrote a book saying the McCann's were guilty. He was dismissed probably because he was making things up.
It wasn't just him though was it. It was the opinion of the senior detectives working on the case including whats his name Tavares Almeida, I think.
If the questioning of the parents and their friends was as tardy and incompetent as some suggest here surely it would have been imperative on SY to question them again properly?What do you expect they could have added beyond what they told the police in their witness statements and rogatories that would have taken the case any further forward? Do you imagine they would have caved in under the pressure of having to revisit it all over again? That said, if the Met police had questioned them about some of the strange anomalies that appeared in their non-verbatim twice translated statements giving the a chance to clarifyand correct any mistakes would you have believed a word? Doubtful!
What do you expect they could have added beyond what they told the police in their witness statements and rogatories that would have taken the case any further forward? Do you imagine they would have caved in under the pressure of having to revisit it all over again? That said, if the Met police had questioned them about some of the strange anomalies that appeared in their non-verbatim twice translated statements giving the a chance to clarifyand correct any mistakes would you have believed a word? Doubtful!
The parents didn't take part in the rogatories and Kate didn't answer 42 of her arguido questions.What a very odd response. If you were living rent free in my head I?d be calling for you to be evicted pdq. Also I didn?t claim that SY would care what you thought, another odd remark. None of the anomalies I?m referring to are particularly significant and I expect that if any were, a quick phone call or catch up meeting would soon iron them out, or are you claiming to know that the Met have never discussed any elements of the case with the McCanns in 13 years?
Flattered as I am to live rent free in your head I'm sure SY wouldn't have cared what I thought of the parent's answers and if there was anomalies in the statements taken by the Portuguese police surely it would have been prudent for SY to requestion them?
What a very odd response. If you were living rent free in my head I?d be calling for you to be evicted pdq. Also I didn?t claim that SY would care what you thought, another odd remark. None of the anomalies I?m referring to are particularly significant and I expect that if any were, a quick phone call or catch up meeting would soon iron them out, or are you claiming to know that the Met have never discussed any elements of the case with the McCanns in 13 years?
Operation Grange assigned the McCanns a Family Liaison Officer who they still have apparently. One of the roles of a FLO is as a conduit of information between victims? families and the gathering and dissemination of information regarding the investigation. Moreover we know that the Met also spoke to The Smiths as part of their investigation so to claim that the Met has not sought any further clarity about points raised in the initial investigation is a load of crap imo.
I know what I said Faithlilly, I wrote it. Nowhere did I make the claim that anyone would give a shit what you thought , only that you probably would find some spurious reasons to keep on doubting the veracity of anything they corrected - comprehension is not your strong point is it.
If you claim to know for a fact that the Met have never discussed any elements of the case with the McCanns then clearly you have insider information on Operation Grange which a mere mortal like me is not privy to. I bow as always to your superiority.