UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧

Other Forums and Organisations => Jeremy Bamber forum => Topic started by: Holly Goodhead on May 11, 2014, 08:13:31 PM

Title: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: Holly Goodhead on May 11, 2014, 08:13:31 PM
If I were posting on blue everyone would be aware of it.  There would be sparks flying. 

Scipio you  have been going on and on about how your app was declined for Blue and how you want a showdown with Mike now it has been authorised you seem to have developed cold feet.  Lol. 

Anyway Lady in Red said she wasn't calling you as I suggested just letting you know that your app was in fact authorised back in Feb.  Go for it!  Red will be clapping and cheering from the sidelines.  Best of luck Scipio. 
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: scipio_usmc on May 11, 2014, 08:33:08 PM
Scipio you  have been going on and on about how your app was declined for Blue and how you want a showdown with Mike now it has been authorised you seem to have developed cold feet.  Lol. 

Anyway Lady in Red said she wasn't calling you as I suggested just letting you know that your app was in fact authorised back in Feb.  Go for it!  Red will be clapping and cheering from the sidelines.  Best of luck Scipio.

I didn't get any email message my membership was approved but let me go try to log in and see.
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: scipio_usmc on May 11, 2014, 08:35:00 PM
Thanks for letting me know Holly, it worked
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: Holly Goodhead on May 11, 2014, 09:59:44 PM
Thanks for letting me know Holly, it worked

You're welcome Scipio

 8)><( 8)><( 8)><( Missing you already


Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: puglove on May 11, 2014, 10:10:20 PM
You're welcome Scipio

 8)><( 8)><( 8)><( Missing you already

Me too.     8(8-))
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: Myster on May 11, 2014, 11:17:50 PM
Me too.     8(8-))
They'll not get a word in edgeways!  @)(++(*
Are we taking bets on how long it'll be before Tesko presses the banned button?  >@@(*&)
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: puglove on May 11, 2014, 11:26:04 PM
They'll not get a word in edgeways!  @)(++(*
Are we taking bets on how long it'll be before Tesko presses the banned button?  >@@(*&)

Scipio will either be global moderator by Friday, or Mike will tell him to go and f..k himself.
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: Myster on May 11, 2014, 11:37:58 PM
Scipio will either be global moderator by Friday, or Mike will tell him to go and f..k himself.
He just needs to copy and paste everything he's written here for complete annihilation... it would save an awful lot of retyping! 8)-)))
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: John on May 12, 2014, 03:17:52 AM
Scipio will either be global moderator by Friday, or Mike will tell him to go and f..k himself.

 8@??)(  ...exactly what I expect.  He won't last a week.
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: scipio_usmc on May 12, 2014, 06:44:24 AM
An excellent synopsis scipio of how the facts have been distorted by Team Bamber.  It's all fluff and flannel at the end of the day but it was fun while it lasted.

So far they are treating me nicer than I expected but we shall see what happens. 
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: sika on May 13, 2014, 07:19:39 AM
There's a massacre going on, over at Tesko towers!  Fantastic work, Scipio.  8@??)(
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: Tim Invictus on May 14, 2014, 04:19:17 PM
There's a massacre going on, over at Tesko towers!  Fantastic work, Scipio.  8@??)(

It won't make any difference to the Bamberettes! The soft-core Bamber fans will never change their minds even if Bamber himself admitted the crime and released a video of him doing it!

Thankfully Caroline has seen the obvious and stated so; Holly will be next! She can see the mountain of circumstantial evidence that has proved time again Bamber is guilty. It's just a matter of time.

I believe a lot of the Bamber groupies enjoy deliberately swimming against the tide but if push came to shove and they were honest with themselves, they know Bamber is guilty!
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: sika on May 14, 2014, 09:07:15 PM
It won't make any difference to the Bamberettes! The soft-core Bamber fans will never change their minds even if Bamber himself admitted the crime and released a video of him doing it!

Thankfully Caroline has seen the obvious and stated so; Holly will be next! She can see the mountain of circumstantial evidence that has proved time again Bamber is guilty. It's just a matter of time.

I believe a lot of the Bamber groupies enjoy deliberately swimming against the tide but if push came to shove and they were honest with themselves, they know Bamber is guilty!
This is what I've tried to say to Holly before.  Even if you are not 100% sure that Bamber is guilty, you surely can see that he was the more likely culprit than Sheila.  If you can't accept that, then you're plain daft!
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: Holly Goodhead on May 20, 2014, 11:52:31 AM
Scipio's posts are not in the same league as Bridget's and Harters.  Plus I don't believe they were ever really rude.  The same could be said of Myster.  I always find his posts consistently good with relevant links and he's pleasant with it. 

Scipi's posts contain many, many errors and he rarely provides any links to support his points.

Example Scipio claims JB was not a good shot.  JB's school records show he was a marksman in the army cadets.  The CoA doc also claims he was a "good shot":

"21. Anthony Pargeter, Nevill Bamber's nephew and a competition standard shot, stayed at White House Farm between 26-28 July 1985. He saw the .22 rifle in the gun cupboard in the ground floor office. The telescopic sights and sound moderator were attached and the gun appeared in a "new" condition. There were no scratches or marks upon it. Later the appellant, himself a good shot, took the rifle out for some target practice."

http://www.homepage-link.to/justice/judgements/Bamber/index.html

Scipio also claims JB could have handed EP a key to WHF.  It seems Scipio is unaware that all doors were bolted from inside.  CoA doc:

"32. Reconnaissance of the farmhouse revealed all the doors to be shut, as were the windows save for one in the main bedroom on the first floor. At about 7.30 a.m., the decision was made to enter the farmhouse and not long afterwards officers moved into place. Through the kitchen window, an officer observed the body of what appeared to be a woman but was in fact Mr. Bamber. Entry was then forced through the rear door which had been locked from the inside."














Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: puglove on May 20, 2014, 12:57:12 PM
Scipio's posts are not in the same league as Bridget's and Harters.  Plus I don't believe they were ever really rude.  The same could be said of Myster.  I always find his posts consistently good with relevant links and he's pleasant with it. 

Scipi's posts contain many, many errors and he rarely provides any links to support his points.

Example Scipio claims JB was not a good shot.  JB's school records show he was a marksman in the army cadets.  The CoA doc also claims he was a "good shot":

"21. Anthony Pargeter, Nevill Bamber's nephew and a competition standard shot, stayed at White House Farm between 26-28 July 1985. He saw the .22 rifle in the gun cupboard in the ground floor office. The telescopic sights and sound moderator were attached and the gun appeared in a "new" condition. There were no scratches or marks upon it. Later the appellant, himself a good shot, took the rifle out for some target practice."

http://www.homepage-link.to/justice/judgements/Bamber/index.html

Scipio also claims JB could have handed EP a key to WHF.  It seems Scipio is unaware that all doors were bolted from inside.  CoA doc:

"32. Reconnaissance of the farmhouse revealed all the doors to be shut, as were the windows save for one in the main bedroom on the first floor. At about 7.30 a.m., the decision was made to enter the farmhouse and not long afterwards officers moved into place. Through the kitchen window, an officer observed the body of what appeared to be a woman but was in fact Mr. Bamber. Entry was then forced through the rear door which had been locked from the inside."

Even though Scipio is relatively new to the WHF case, he's certainly got the blues pulling their handbags up to their chins! And he doesn't feel the need to be childishly offensive, like Gladys, or tell anyone to "f..k off pig-shit breath."

Go on, Holl, admit it.....you miss him!!     8**8:/:
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: Myster on May 25, 2014, 04:54:53 AM
Don't let him fool you, scip -  a CYCLOPS is one of these...

(http://i.imgur.com/bsIxxw9.jpg)

... not an illusory bunch of ex-cons in somebody's desperately overactive loopy imagination!
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: puglove on May 25, 2014, 09:01:53 AM
Don't let him fool you, scip -  a CYCLOPS is one of these...

(http://i.imgur.com/bsIxxw9.jpg)

... not an illusory bunch of ex-cons in somebody's desperately overactive loopy imagination!

Ho ho!! That's clappedout, reading Scipio's posts!!

"Cyclops." Honestly, what a total load of steaming plop. It's Ali Bongo and the naked beetroot party, all over again.
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: Holly Goodhead on November 14, 2014, 01:39:03 PM
What has happened to Scipio?  No sign on Blue or Red?  He stopped posting on Red a while back although I think would call in to read the posts.  He then seemed to post less and less on Blue and now seems to have disappeared altogether?   8)><(
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: abs on November 15, 2014, 08:19:27 PM
What has happened to Scipio?  No sign on Blue or Red?  He stopped posting on Red a while back although I think would call in to read the posts.  He then seemed to post less and less on Blue and now seems to have disappeared altogether?   8)><(

Holly, he´s back, you can have him - for free!  I am generous like that!  8)--))
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: puglove on November 15, 2014, 11:32:42 PM
Holly, he´s back, you can have him - for free!  I am generous like that!  8)--))

Nogen lovovertraedelse, abs, but there wouldn't be much of a blue forum without him. You're (nearly) all grown-ups, and it's a bit silly that he gets treated like a retarded 6 year old when he's consistently bang on the button. xxx     8((()*/
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: abs on November 16, 2014, 12:21:09 AM
Nogen lovovertraedelse, abs, but there wouldn't be much of a blue forum without him. You're (nearly) all grown-ups, and it's a bit silly that he gets treated like a retarded 6 year old when he's consistently bang on the button. xxx     8((()*/

Hi shona, you can have him too! Holls and you can share him!  8@??)(
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: Myster on November 16, 2014, 07:58:01 AM
If Freddy Handel could knock out a catchy tune for him he can't be all that bad... just badass! ?>)()<

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzUTpyquTMA (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzUTpyquTMA)
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: Andrea on November 16, 2014, 10:56:09 AM
Nogen lovovertraedelse, abs, but there wouldn't be much of a blue forum without him. You're (nearly) all grown-ups, and it's a bit silly that he gets treated like a retarded 6 year old when he's consistently bang on the button. xxx     8((()*/

Scip does a good job on blue, shame they want to impose a ban.
Adam comes in for a lot of stick on blue too, he gets called some names on there that I didn't think were allowed, or does that only apply to JB supporters? Double standards tut tut.
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: abs on November 16, 2014, 12:07:10 PM
Scip does a good job on blue, shame they want to impose a ban.
Adam comes in for a lot of stick on blue too, he gets called some names on there that I didn't think were allowed, or does that only apply to JB supporters? Double standards tut tut.

By saying that, you agree with all the nasty things he has said to for instance me. Really nasty stuff. I know I was very polite to him in the beginning, I even supported him during his last ban. But hey ho, who cares!
I agree that sometimes Adam is on the receiving end of some stick, but he also deliberately winds up people in my opinion. He can be annoying, but I think that at the end of the day, he is not all that bad.
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: Holly Goodhead on November 16, 2014, 01:19:37 PM
Scopio like ALL posters has good and not so good points.

His good points are that he works hard at understanding the case as he sees it.  He obviously carries out a lot of research and mostly provides a lot of material to support his arguments.  It takes time and effort to fo this.   8@??)(

His not so good points are that he can be abrasive as puglove said.  Personally it doesn't bother me.  I just accept that's his posting style and don't take it personally.  He has been very personal and rude to me on many occasions so no one should be under the illusion he hasn't.

I think Adam makes some good posts/threads too.  His naughtiness sort of reminds me of mine  *&*%£

What do Bluies want to sit around in some kind of big family slipper sipping hot coco and all agreeing?
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: puglove on November 16, 2014, 01:23:26 PM
By saying that, you agree with all the nasty things he has said to for instance me. Really nasty stuff. I know I was very polite to him in the beginning, I even supported him during his last ban. But hey ho, who cares!
I agree that sometimes Adam is on the receiving end of some stick, but he also deliberately winds up people in my opinion. He can be annoying, but I think that at the end of the day, he is not all that bad.

I doubt if anyone enjoys watching you being insulted, abs, especially as you're always polite and kind. But, it's just scipio's way and Andy's right, he does do a top job!

(Blimey, abs, do you remember smiffy? Scipio is a puss compared to him!)
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: abs on November 16, 2014, 03:15:49 PM
I doubt if anyone enjoys watching you being insulted, abs, especially as you're always polite and kind. But, it's just scipio's way and Andy's right, he does do a top job!

(Blimey, abs, do you remember smiffy? Scipio is a puss compared to him!)

Who could forget good old Smiffs?! He called me an idiot - because I don´t think the marks on Ralph´s arm is from fingernails. What class!  @)(++(*
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: abs on November 16, 2014, 04:47:40 PM
Scopio like ALL posters has good and not so good points.

His good points are that he works hard at understanding the case as he sees it.  He obviously carries out a lot of research and mostly provides a lot of material to support his arguments.  It takes time and effort to fo this.   8@??)(

His not so good points are that he can be abrasive as puglove said.  Personally it doesn't bother me.  I just accept that's his posting style and don't take it personally.  He has been very personal and rude to me on many occasions so no one should be under the illusion he hasn't.

I think Adam makes some good posts/threads too.  His naughtiness sort of reminds me of mine  *&*%£

What do Bluies want to sit around in some kind of big family slipper sipping hot coco and all agreeing?

I never was under that illusion, I saw his rude posts to you here before he joined blue. He tried to be polite in the beginning, but it didn´t last long. At all!
What bothers me when someone is rude to me on these boards is that I don´t feel I can answer back as well as I want to. This is not my language, so I do have that handicap.
Anyway, I have him on ignore, so I don´t read most of what he posts. Problem solved.
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: Holly Goodhead on November 16, 2014, 06:14:16 PM
I never was under that illusion, I saw his rude posts to you here before he joined blue. He tried to be polite in the beginning, but it didn´t last long. At all!
What bothers me when someone is rude to me on these boards is that I don´t feel I can answer back as well as I want to. This is not my language, so I do have that handicap.
Anyway, I have him on ignore, so I don´t read most of what he posts. Problem solved.

Yes Tim was very gentlemanly and pulled him up about it.  On another occasion John more generally asked for personal comments to be curtailed.  I only complained once when I was actually mistaken (I think) and thought Scipio had changed my post.  At least with Scipio he's all upfront - I doubt he gossips and bitches in pm's behind posters' backs. 

Abs when you say that when someone is rude  and you don't feel you can answer back as well as you want to, do you mean that you feel intimated or angry (or might get angry and you wouldn't want to) or something else?
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: abs on November 16, 2014, 06:29:21 PM
Yes Tim was very gentlemanly and pulled him up about it.  On another occasion John more generally asked for personal comments to be curtailed.  I only complained once when I was actually mistaken (I think) and thought Scipio had changed my post.  At least with Scipio he's all upfront - I doubt he gossips and bitches in pm's behind posters' backs. 

Abs when you say that when someone is rude  and you don't feel you can answer back as well as you want to, do you mean that you feel intimated or angry (or might get angry and you wouldn't want to) or something else?

I mean that I don´t have the "street smarts" that most of you have, due to this not being my first language. Can´t answer back in a convincing way - that is frustrating. Come at me in Danish, and I´ll give ya!!  8(0(*
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: Holly Goodhead on November 16, 2014, 06:55:50 PM
I mean that I don´t have the "street smarts" that most of you have, due to this not being my first language. Can´t answer back in a convincing way - that is frustrating. Come at me in Danish, and I´ll give ya!!  8(0(*

It's highly embarrassing that so few home grown Brits speak only English and often not very well  8()-000(  I can speak a little (being the operative word) French from school and slightly (again being the operative word) better Italian from when I worked as a chalet maid in the Dolomites. 

I always think of you being very ladylike Abs  8(>((  And arty  8(>((  I enjoy reading your posts and find them factually correct which is very important to me especially as the WHF case seems such a muddle. 
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: Myster on November 16, 2014, 07:28:27 PM
I mean that I don´t have the "street smarts" that most of you have, due to this not being my first language. Can´t answer back in a convincing way - that is frustrating. Come at me in Danish, and I´ll give ya!!  8(0(*
You could always call him a saggar maker's bottom knocker... and he wouldn't have the foggiest idea what you were on about!
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: abs on November 16, 2014, 07:42:16 PM
You could always call him a saggar maker's bottom knocker... and he wouldn't have the foggiest idea what you were on about!

Scribble, scribble, taking notes!  8(0(*
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: Tim Invictus on November 18, 2014, 12:14:12 AM
Abs hun your English, including 'street smarts' is far superior to many at Teskos! I mean look at Nug Nug and a few other of the cabbages over there ... they can barely 'reed' let alone 'right'!
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: puglove on November 18, 2014, 07:55:27 AM
Gladys!! You nicked my "polarized"!! How weird, when you never look on here!!

Here are some more words that you can have.

tw... Plonker. Creep. Butt-sucker. Loser. Shouty old man who should know better.

I also toyed with you battling with scipio, and came up with hydroceles and the lion.

"Scipio, you are listening to the ignorance of fools." (Usual Gladys pomposity).

Well, Gladys, THIS fool (for one) clearly remembers you posting that you did indeed wish that you had killed the Caffell boys, to "get Jeremy off the hook."

And you're a Grandad.     8(8-))
Title: Re: Scipio reviews the WHF evidence on the blue forum.
Post by: abs on November 18, 2014, 12:24:49 PM
Abs hun your English, including 'street smarts' is far superior to many at Teskos! I mean look at Nug Nug and a few other of the cabbages over there ... they can barely 'reed' let alone 'right'!

Thanks Tim - but I think you know what I mean, living away from your native country.

Nugnug is not a cabbage, he often cuts to the bone with his posts. He is probably dyslexic, but that does not make people stupid, and I admire him for not letting it stop him from posting!