UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧
Welcome to the UK Justice Forum => New members please introduce yourself here. => Topic started by: adam on October 22, 2014, 09:00:27 PM
-
How is everyone ?
First post on here after getting my second short ban on blue 8(8-)). Which is good going for a guilter joining a hard core pro Bamber site in December 2013.
There have been some nice threads and posts about me on here. Thank you.
Obviously I have been reading this forum. Lots of good posts but a lot quieter than the blue forum.
I also cannot understand why Jeremy has supporters. There is so much compelling evidence against him. And it's impossible that Sheila could have committed the massacre. But if people wish to fire fight....
I will be posting on here sometimes. Look forward to some good debate.
-
Hello adam... yet another one to jump the sinking ship!
Not only a lot quieter, but almost comatose Bamber-wise these days, so I don't think you'll have much oppo here other than from Golly!
It's good though to have the case files - witness statements, pathology reports, photos, etc. here on a forum which you don't have to join in order to study and come to one's own conclusions regarding Jeremy Bamber's guilt.
I just look at Sheila Caffell with her bloodspot-free nightdress and body and think no way... no chance at all that she was involved in a violent confrontation with her father (and mother) that night.
-
Welcome Adam. :)
-
How is everyone ?
First post on here after getting my second short ban on blue 8(8-)). Which is good going for a guilter joining a hard core pro Bamber site in December 2013.
There have been some nice threads and posts about me on here. Thank you.
Obviously I have been reading this forum. Lots of good posts but a lot quieter than the blue forum.
I also cannot understand why Jeremy has supporters. There is so much compelling evidence against him. And it's impossible that Sheila could have committed the massacre. But if people wish to fire fight....
I will be posting on here sometimes. Look forward to some good debate.
Hi Adam
Nice to meet you.
I thought you had come over to place your bet Lookout v NGB? 8(0(*
One of the reasons I like posting here is that aren't too many posts as I have neither the time or inclination to go round on the old hamster wheel. I think I have covered my 'reasons why' on most aspects of the case. If you're interested in my views please go through my posts on my profile. If there's anything in particular you wish to debate then by all means retrieve the relevant posts but otherwise I'm not keen on wasting time covering old ground. Of course it might just be a cop out in that I know you will thrash me in a debate 8(0(*
-
Hi Adam
Nice to meet you.
I thought you had come over to place your bet Lookout v NGB? 8(0(*
One of the reasons I like posting here is that aren't too many posts as I have neither the time or inclination to go round on the old hamster wheel. I think I have covered my 'reasons why' on most aspects of the case. If you're interested in my views please go through my posts on my profile. If there's anything in particular you wish to debate then by all means retrieve the relevant posts but otherwise I'm not keen on wasting time covering old ground. Of course it might just be a cop out in that I know you will thrash me in a debate 8(0(*
Thanks to everyone.
I have read you're posts. Joined here several months ago. Along with Blue.
Got wrapped up in Blue. Assumed the pro Jeremy supporters would become guilters within a few days after my posts. But they dug in and focused on me. Some have changed stance. Some amazingly still support Jeremy.
-
Thanks to everyone.
I have read you're posts. Joined here several months ago. Along with Blue.
Got wrapped up in Blue. Assumed the pro Jeremy supporters would become guilters within a few days after my posts. But they dug in and focused on me. Some have changed stance. Some amazingly still support Jeremy.
I'm not surprised they focused on you Adam. Who else is there to focus on? Gladys? Mike? I'm surprised you got off their alive with all those Milfs 8(0(*
-
I'm not surprised they focused on you Adam. Who else is there to focus on? Gladys? Mike? I'm surprised you got off there alive with all those Milfs 8(0(*
-
Welcome Adam ... I rarely look at Tesco's forum but I have heard you have done great work winding up the Bamberettes ... good work mate! Many of us have been thru the same process and are banned for life! Contempt where it's due!
This forum is a lot quieter unless you're a Maddy McCann fanatic ... There's plenty of those here! It would help if John our esteemed leader hadn't banned Shona from here; by far the wittiest poster on either forum in my opinion! It would also help if John stayed on his own forum and added to the debates here rather than spending half his time on Blue joining in with the Bamberettes!
I hope you're taking note John!
-
I thought puglove had been unbanned? I sent her a pm and it went thru' although I haven't heard back. I'll try an email later. Perhaps she no longer feels she wants to be a member here and contribute. That's how I felt when I received a temporary ban from Blue; I felt I was singled out and treated unfairly and thought sod em ?{)(**
-
Welcome Adam ... I rarely look at Tesco's forum but I have heard you have done great work winding up the Bamberettes ... good work mate! Many of us have been thru the same process and are banned for life! Contempt where it's due!
This forum is a lot quieter unless you're a Maddy McCann fanatic ... There's plenty of those here! It would help if John our esteemed leader hadn't banned Shona from here; by far the wittiest poster on either forum in my opinion! It would also help if John stayed on his own forum and added to the debates here rather than spending half his time on Blue joining in with the Bamberettes!
I hope you're taking note John!
Hi.
Just had a browse of the Blue. They are arguing about not very much again.
A lot have reluctantly turned to guilty as once me & other posters started showing Jeremy's guilt they had to. But they all put up a fight & don't like me for forcing the change.
A few are in self denial. But deep down know of his guilt. So there is not much to debate.
I tried to create a debate yesterday about why Jeremy challenged the 'life is life' law, but they tried to focus on me. As they can't give a good reason, apart from self publicity.
-
That's an interesting point Adam - what is your angle on that debate?
Do you think after 30 years he concentrated on that effort so he could finally confess and be released?
-
I don't believe that. He will never confess as he likes the attention too much.
Confessing will not result in a release. His crime was shocking. He has also not confessed his innocence for 29 years. So would have to spend years showing his about turn is genuine and he is reformed. Rather than just an attempt to get released.
Bambers reaction when the law was changed was very muted. Simply saying the victory was 'hollow as he is innocent'.
He did it to create publicity for himself.
-
I don't believe that. He will never confess as he likes the attention too much.
Confessing will not result in a release. His crime was shocking. He has also not confessed his innocence for 29 years. So would have to spend years showing his about turn is genuine and he is reformed. Rather than just an attempt to get released.
Bambers reaction when the law was changed was very muted. Simply saying the victory was 'hollow as he is innocent'.
He did it to create publicity for himself.
interesting angle .
-
That's an interesting point Adam - what is your angle on that debate?
Do you think after 30 years he concentrated on that effort so he could finally confess and be released?
Somethings can be confessed to but executing twin 6 year old boys purely out of greed can never be one of them. Bamber knows there can be no redemption from that; one of the most callous acts in history. Confessing would do him no good whatsoever so, imo, it will never happen.
-
Bamber is in a difficult position.
He has repeatedly been found guilty of murdering two six year olds. But has denied doing it. As the facts prove otherwise, he must be lying.
If he admitted it early on, it is 100% certain. So he will forever be vilified as a child murderer.
Admitting it years later. Means he did it and lied for decades. So a certain liar and murderer.
None of those options are appealing.
Guess he shouldn't have done it.
-
Sorry to hear of your ban Adam. When you return, i am sure that you won't have to tolerate snide, sarcastic remarks and their policy of attacking the post and not the poster will apply to you also.
-
Just guessing but I think that might depend on why he was banned.
He will return though I am sure . Sounds like he wants to bump up his "conversion " rate.
-
I agree simong, shame they never applied the policy when it came to Adam or the family.
I suppose they must me legitimate targets. As long it's no pro supporter you attack.
-
A belated welcome to the forum Adam. 8((()*/
-
Evening rles, what evidence do you think points to his innocence?