UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧
Disappeared and Abducted Children and Young Adults => Madeleine McCann (3) disappeared from her parent's holiday apartment at Ocean Club, Praia da Luz, Portugal on 3 May 2007. No trace of her has ever been found. => Video Library => Topic started by: Matt Erixon on April 15, 2015, 09:44:15 PM
-
Admin Note
This media presentation is provided solely for information and debating purposes.
No endorsement of its content is intended or implied.
Buried By Mainstream Media - The Phantoms
Filmed in 2014/2015, DVD PAL 16:9, By Richard D. Hall
Following on from his earlier series of films about the Madeleine McCann mystery, Richard D. Hall examines in a level of detail never covered before in any TV documentary, the claims that Madeleine was abducted. Numerous sightings of a man were reported to the police on different dates following the disappearance. This film examines the credibility of these sightings by looking at police witness statements, media reports and other evidence. After a thorough and extensive examination of all this evidence, the most likely conclusion is laid bare for all to see. Once you have watched the documentary, your perception of mainstream media and establishment groups such as The BBC, The Cabinet Office, Scotland Yard and British Intelligence may well need a dramatic adjustment.
Running Time : 2 hours 55 minutes (approx)
Part 1-5
http://blip.tv/richplanet/the-phantoms-the-true-story-of-madeleine-mccann-7187916
-
Buried By Mainstream Media - The Phantoms
Filmed in 2014/2015, DVD PAL 16:9, By Richard D. Hall
Following on from his earlier series of films about the Madeleine McCann mystery, Richard D. Hall examines in a level of detail never covered before in any TV documentary, the claims that Madeleine was abducted. Numerous sightings of a man were reported to the police on different dates following the disappearance. This film examines the credibility of these sightings by looking at police witness statements, media reports and other evidence. After a thorough and extensive examination of all this evidence, the most likely conclusion is laid bare for all to see. Once you have watched the documentary, your perception of mainstream media and establishment groups such as The BBC, The Cabinet Office, Scotland Yard and British Intelligence may well need a dramatic adjustment.
Running Time : 2 hours 55 minutes (approx)
Part 1-5
http://blip.tv/richplanet/the-phantoms-the-true-story-of-madeleine-mccann-7187916
Thank you for bringing this to our attention Matt, I have moved it to the video library. All I need now is a couple of spare hours to view it. %#&%4%
-
Going to have a look at this. Thanks for the link.
I enjoyed his last documentary as he seemed to take a fact based approach. In fact he has made corrections on his website to the documentary when people have written/emailed in to point them out. But, was rather dismayed to see his other works though regarding alien abduction, flesh eating aliens etc and made me have a lot less regard for the original doc. Still, will watch this one with some interest - at least it is something new...
-
Going to have a look at this. Thanks for the link.
I enjoyed his last documentary as he seemed to take a fact based approach. In fact he has made corrections on his website to the documentary when people have written/emailed in to point them out. But, was rather dismayed to see his other works though regarding alien abduction, flesh eating aliens etc and made me have a lot less regard for the original doc. Still, will watch this one with some interest - at least it is something new...
As with most authors and documentary makers who write about real life events, once you deviate from a serious factual and evidence-based product into the realms of fantasy and make believe, your credibility with thereafter be questioned. David Icke being the classic example.
-
As with most authors and documentary makers who write about real life events, once you deviate from a serious factual and evidence-based product into the realms of fantasy and make believe, your credibility with thereafter be questioned. David Icke being the classic example.
IMO Hall May well be a very useful stooge. He takes some issues that present real problems for McCans supporters then muddies the water with far fetched conspiracies. He therefore taints as “ludicrous” what would otherwise be serious questions. One example is how he turns Smithman into a deep state conspiracy and there’s a clip where he has Smithman carrying the child the wrong way (like Tannerman). No serious appraisal of Smith’s evidence would make such a mistake. Another example is the Peter Hyatt interview. It’s really very convincing until he ends it with talk of a faked moon landing. IMO he’s a useful stooge!
-
IMO Hall May well be a very useful stooge. He takes some issues that present real problems for McCans supporters then muddies the water with far fetched conspiracies. He therefore taints as “ludicrous” what would otherwise be serious questions. One example is how he turns Smithman into a deep state conspiracy and there’s a clip where he has Smithman carrying the child the wrong way (like Tannerman). No serious appraisal of Smith’s evidence would make such a mistake. Another example is the Peter Hyatt interview. It’s really very convincing until he ends it with talk of a faked moon landing. IMO he’s a useful stooge!
Nail on head.