UK Justice Forum 🇬🇧

What is actual in your view?  That Madeleine hasn't come to harm?  Or that the BKA has evidence to the contrary?

My view is that there's a disconnect from what is claimed and no communication to either OG or the McCanns.

Nothing new, that's nigh on two hrs of my life wasted watching it.

No one forced you.  I don't know what you were expecting?  A full and frank confession from Kate and Gerry perhaps?

As Gildas refuses to provide a cite and as this is a crucial part of the argument I thought I would ask Chat GPT if the claim was true or not.  Here is the detailed response.  Feel free to challenge any and every point made:

CHAT GPT -
What the public record actually supports

There is now substantial reporting that German investigators possess photographic material which they regard as highly significant to the conclusion that Madeleine is dead.

In 2025, reporting on material recovered from Br?ckner?s abandoned factory said investigators had a hard drive containing photographs taken in Portugal, which they believed was important in persuading them that Madeleine died shortly after her disappearance. The same reporting describes the USB sticks and memory cards found under the dead dog, containing extensive child-abuse material.

There is also reporting that German investigators had an external hard drive associated with the Madeleine investigation. During the Br?ckner trial, BKA detective Titus Stampa referred to an account as the ?murder? account and an external hard drive ?also belonging to the killing case?, while declining to disclose its contents because they related to Madeleine?s killing.

So there is a very important factual background to Gildas?s argument that I underplayed.

But there is an important distinction

The strongest version of Gildas?s claim would be:

German investigators have officially admitted that they possess photographs showing Madeleine dead.

I have not yet found an authoritative German police/prosecutor source using those exact words.

What I can substantiate is something slightly different but still very significant:

* German authorities have publicly said they have concrete evidence leading them to believe Madeleine is dead.
* Evidence recovered from Br?ckner?s property included digital media.
* German investigators have possessed a hard drive containing photographs taken in Portugal which reporting says was significant to their conclusion that Madeleine died.
* A BKA detective subsequently confirmed in court the existence of material directly connected with the ?killing of Maddie?, while refusing to disclose its contents.

There was and still is a disconnect between what is claimed and what is actual, the Official find MM page still declares there in no evidence to suggest MM as come to harm.The BKA through OG do not have to provide direct evidence of its exist they merely have to confirm through OG what they have.

As Gildas refuses to provide a cite and as this is a crucial part of the argument I thought I would ask Chat GPT if the claim was true or not.  Here is the detailed response.  Feel free to challenge any and every point made:

CHAT GPT -
What the public record actually supports

There is now substantial reporting that German investigators possess photographic material which they regard as highly significant to the conclusion that Madeleine is dead.

In 2025, reporting on material recovered from Br?ckner?s abandoned factory said investigators had a hard drive containing photographs taken in Portugal, which they believed was important in persuading them that Madeleine died shortly after her disappearance. The same reporting describes the USB sticks and memory cards found under the dead dog, containing extensive child-abuse material.

There is also reporting that German investigators had an external hard drive associated with the Madeleine investigation. During the Br?ckner trial, BKA detective Titus Stampa referred to an account as the ?murder? account and an external hard drive ?also belonging to the killing case?, while declining to disclose its contents because they related to Madeleine?s killing.

So there is a very important factual background to Gildas?s argument that I underplayed.

But there is an important distinction

The strongest version of Gildas?s claim would be:

German investigators have officially admitted that they possess photographs showing Madeleine dead.

I have not yet found an authoritative German police/prosecutor source using those exact words.

What I can substantiate is something slightly different but still very significant:

* German authorities have publicly said they have concrete evidence leading them to believe Madeleine is dead.
* Evidence recovered from Br?ckner?s property included digital media.
* German investigators have possessed a hard drive containing photographs taken in Portugal which reporting says was significant to their conclusion that Madeleine died.
* A BKA detective subsequently confirmed in court the existence of material directly connected with the ?killing of Maddie?, while refusing to disclose its contents.

I did reply but the reply has not appeared.I am not going to type it out again. I said I that I was not going to be controlled by you.
I then said that said that I was only posting to provide information about Bernt's book, but since
It was not required I was going to finish posting.
Before I go though, I would like to say that, I don't believe that
The German police have proof that Christian b murdered Madeleine
I don't believe they have photos of a dead Madeleine.
I don't believe that the photos are the proof that Christian b.murdered  Madeleine
I don't believe Christian B had photos of a dead Madeleine because he caught Gerry burying her(Wonderfulspam, I think)
Obviously, I don't believe any of the excuses of why Christian b. has not been charged
I do believe Friedrich Fulscher when he says Christian B. Will not be charged with the abduction of Madeleine.

As Gildas refuses to provide a cite and as this is a crucial part of the argument I thought I would ask Chat GPT if the claim was true or not.  Here is the detailed response.  Feel free to challenge any and every point made:

CHAT GPT -
What the public record actually supports

There is now substantial reporting that German investigators possess photographic material which they regard as highly significant to the conclusion that Madeleine is dead.

In 2025, reporting on material recovered from Br?ckner?s abandoned factory said investigators had a hard drive containing photographs taken in Portugal, which they believed was important in persuading them that Madeleine died shortly after her disappearance. The same reporting describes the USB sticks and memory cards found under the dead dog, containing extensive child-abuse material.

There is also reporting that German investigators had an external hard drive associated with the Madeleine investigation. During the Br?ckner trial, BKA detective Titus Stampa referred to an account as the ?murder? account and an external hard drive ?also belonging to the killing case?, while declining to disclose its contents because they related to Madeleine?s killing.

So there is a very important factual background to Gildas?s argument that I underplayed.

But there is an important distinction

The strongest version of Gildas?s claim would be:

German investigators have officially admitted that they possess photographs showing Madeleine dead.

I have not yet found an authoritative German police/prosecutor source using those exact words.

What I can substantiate is something slightly different but still very significant:

* German authorities have publicly said they have concrete evidence leading them to believe Madeleine is dead.
* Evidence recovered from Br?ckner?s property included digital media.
* German investigators have possessed a hard drive containing photographs taken in Portugal which reporting says was significant to their conclusion that Madeleine died.
* A BKA detective subsequently confirmed in court the existence of material directly connected with the ?killing of Maddie?, while refusing to disclose its contents.