Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61

There's no grand conspiracy in my theory. Just Mr & Mrs McCann disposing of Madeleine's body & getting away with it. It is the sheer simplicity of the bin theory which makes it the most plausible explanation. No abductor boogey men lurking in the shadows, staking out the McCanns apartment for days, extra abductors & getaway vehicles & so on. All too convoluted. No, it is the simplest explanation that is usually correct in life. She died in the apartment, Gerry took her out on his 9pm check, recovered her after suggesting everyone split up & search, then he passed the Smith family with a Maddie who wasn't looking too well & dressed in the wrong pyjamas, then he disposed of her. Unfortunately a lot of gullible idiots fell for it. The McCanns capitalised on the moral panic around paedophiles & used it to their advantage. Mr Mccann phoning someone back home & telling them that gangs of Portuguese paedophiles had busted open the window & snatched Maddie. The case will never be 'solved' because Maddie is simply unrecoverable. But that doesn't mean it isn't obvious the Mccanns did it. Well it is to me anyway.
62
Why did one Smith family member "go rogue", months after stating he wouldn't recognise the stranger again? Which parts of his original testimony supporting a possible stranger abduction were lies, thus casting doubt on the veracity of the other family members' statements?
Is this the supposed campaign to exonerate Murat again? Anyone who still believes that might as well get in bed with the Brueckner supporters for me, it's so outlandish a theory.
63
Why are you obfuscating?  Is the truth a little uncomfortable for you?

I rather thought it was the other way around.
64
Why did one Smith family member "go rogue", months after stating he wouldn't recognise the stranger again? Which parts of his original testimony supporting a possible stranger abduction were lies, thus casting doubt on the veracity of the other family members' statements?

Why are you obfuscating?  Is the truth a little uncomfortable for you?
65
You know fully well that Smith identified Gerry later. But, the typically British, blonde little girl, who wasn't looking very well, she was dressed in the pyjamas the McCanns claim Maddie wasn't. When you add that to the alarm being raised before 10pm & Gerry suggesting they split up & search, then disappearing. When you put it all together it's obvious it was Gerry.

Why did one Smith family member "go rogue", months after stating he wouldn't recognise the stranger again? Which parts of his original testimony supporting a possible stranger abduction were lies, thus casting doubt on the veracity of the other family members' statements?
66
You know fully well that Smith identified Gerry later. But, the typically British, blonde little girl, who wasn't looking very well, she was dressed in the pyjamas the McCanns claim Maddie wasn't. When you add that to the alarm being raised before 10pm & Gerry suggesting they split up & search, then disappearing. When you put it all together it's obvious it was Gerry.

Added to that, the innocent Mccanns who are totally innocent & Gerry couldn't possibly have been Smithman, because he was at the tapas at the time of the sighting, supposedly. The innocent McCanns ignored the advice of experts, buried the Smith e-fits & never promoted the sighting. When you add that to it is even more obvious the man the Smiths saw was Gerry McCann. No gangs of predatory paedophiles breaking in drugging Maddie then passing her out of the window off into a waiting getaway car. There's no evidence of any of that. Only evidence Madeleine, in the wrong pyjamas, was deceased & her parents covered up the death by faking an abduction. That is all that can be reasonably deduced from the totality of the Smith sighting when accounting for the evidence. Basically.
67
Please provide cites from the Smiths' original statements made in May 2007 confirming the man they saw resembled Gerry.

You know fully well that Smith identified Gerry later. But, the typically British, blonde little girl, who wasn't looking very well, she was dressed in the pyjamas the McCanns claim Maddie wasn't. When you add that to the alarm being raised before 10pm & Gerry suggesting they split up & search, then disappearing. When you put it all together it's obvious it was Gerry.
68
The sighting supports abduction by a stranger, who resembled Gerry & had drugged Maddie & changed her pyjamas, if we account for the details. Indeed, your heroes SY depicted Smithman's Maddie in the long sleeve pyjamas her mother wished she'd dressed her in. So you're in good company, they too believe there's a Gerrylike, anaesthetist, pyjama changing paedo abductor on the loose. I wonder why there haven't been any similar abductions?

Please provide cites from the Smiths' original statements made in May 2007 confirming the man they saw resembled Gerry.
69
All the evidence given by the Smith family in their May 2007 statements indicated they saw an unknown  man carrying a child, who may have been Madeleine, towards the beach. As they must have known what Madeleine looked like, via media etc, then equally they must have known what Gerry looked like before approaching police.
Their statements supported the abduction by stranger theory and nothing else. Have you considered the possibility the Smiths too were part of your grand cover-up conspiracy as orchestrated by Team McCann?

The sighting supports abduction by a stranger, who resembled Gerry & had drugged Maddie & changed her pyjamas, if we account for the details. Indeed, your heroes SY depicted Smithman's Maddie in the long sleeve pyjamas her mother wished she'd dressed her in. So you're in good company, they too believe there's a Gerrylike, anaesthetist, pyjama changing paedo abductor on the loose. I wonder why there haven't been any similar abductions?
70
That's only theory. But it's possible that happened based on, the alarm being raised before 10pm, Gerry suggesting everyone split up, him disappearing & then being seen by the Smiths. Added to that that the only evidence Madeleine was abducted is the Smith sighting, where Maddie, in the wrong pyjamas, wasn't looking too well.

All the evidence given by the Smith family in their May 2007 statements indicated they saw an unknown  man carrying a child, who may have been Madeleine, towards the beach. As they must have known what Madeleine looked like, via media etc, then equally they must have known what Gerry looked like before approaching police.
Their statements supported the abduction by stranger theory and nothing else. Have you considered the possibility the Smiths too were part of your grand cover-up conspiracy as orchestrated by Team McCann?
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10