Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10
82
Episode 2 of the new Madeleine documentary on Amazon Prime does a good job at reminding us how vile the anti McCanns trolls have been over the years.  I love Jim Gamble, he speaks such sense and is obviously a very decent bloke.
83
Fulscher?s source, presumably someone within the German police. Mmmm I wonder why the German police would leak to their prime suspect that they have evidence that they don?t have? That is a head scratcher.

Of course if Fulscher knows that it?s not true why would he keep it secret?
You?ve lost me.  Fulscher did not say to Stellander that the information was not true, how would he know one way or the other? 
PS: are you now backtracking on Stellander being a liar?
84
The point I was making was that the source was not giving any inside knowledge, but telling him what was soon to be public knowledge.
Except the German police have never confirmed they have photos of Madeleine dead.
85
One thing we have agreed on for several years is that Stellander?s claims come apart even under even the most light weight pressure. We have agreed for several years that he lacks credibility. I stand by my opinion, do you think that you were wrong?
You either didn?t read my post or you didn?t understand it.  Stellander thinks Madeleine died in an accident in the apartment.  That?s what you believe.  He thinks the parents covered it up.  You do too.  He thinks there is some conspiracy involving the Tapas group as do you.  OK, you disagree on when exactly it happened and how they disposed of the body but basically you are both in the same camp.  Me, I think all you Anti McCanns? claims fall apart under the most cursory examination.  I definitely don?t think I?m wrong but I do think you?ve all managed to convince yourselves that you are right and don?t want to hear anything which challenges your theories, which is why I find Stellander?s revelation about the photographs so surprising. 
86
What advantage can you perceive Stellander gaining in divulging the info from Fulscher?s source about the photos?
The point I was making was that the source was not giving any inside knowledge, but telling him what was soon to be public knowledge.






87
What advantage can you perceive Stellander gaining in divulging the info from Fulscher?s source about the photos?

Fulscher?s source, presumably someone within the German police. Mmmm I wonder why the German police would leak to their prime suspect that they have evidence that they don?t have? That is a head scratcher.

Of course if Fulscher knows that it?s not true why would he keep it secret?
88
I?ve repeatedly stated what I think of Stellander and why I think this particular revelation might be significant (ie no motive to lie about something which contradicts his own narrative).  It?s no different to you fixating on Gerry?s 10.13pm - you think he?s a liar except on this one point which supports your argument.  So, repeatedly asking me the same question isn?t going to get us anywhere is it?  You appear completely unwilling to accept that it is possible that the German police actually have photos of a dead Madeleine and I don?t accept that Gerry was recording the time accurately to the minute in his second statement and in so doing destroying his own alibi.  Unlike you I do make time to consider people?s motivations and question what they might gain from lying about certain things they reveal. I find it a helpful exercise, perhaps make time yourself one day to do likewise?  Do you agree with the premise that people usually tell lies to give themselves or someone they care about an advantage in some way?  That might help you to understand when people are lying and when they are not.
PS: there?s virtually nothing in this case we agree on as far as I recall.  You have far more in common with Bernt Stellander than you do with me in that regard.

One thing we have agreed on for several years is that Stellander?s claims come apart even under even the most light weight pressure. We have agreed for several years that he lacks credibility. I stand by my opinion, do you think that you were wrong?
89
Well, in the absence of evidence that they have been, we just have to believe the McCanns have been thoroughly re-interviewed by detectives. It appears. Just like we have to believe the MET found some evidence of abduction. The only evidence of abduction they have shown however is the Smith sighting.
Convicted rapist and convicted child molester, Brueckner admits to being close to where Madeleine was sleeping on the night she disappeared.
His presence confirmed by data collected in evidence at the time.
90
hi faithlily,
Don't you remember that the German police claimed they had photos of a dead Madeleine.
The meeting between Bernt and Friedrich will have taken place just before the claim was made public.
So, what has been happening? Have some people been taking a second bite of the same cherry?
What advantage can you perceive Stellander gaining in divulging the info from Fulscher?s source about the photos?
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10