Mccanns cant remember the most important sightings they looked at

[Redblossom]

once or twice besides tanner and smith, really racking their brains and scratching and smirking
!!!!
31.20

[sadie]

What a cheating video. 

Very noticeable the way that the ?air con drowns out the Mccanns words but there is no background noise whatsoever when Sandras asks her questions.  I can barely make sense of Gerrys words, or Kates.  This is not a level playing field.


One only has to look at Kate and Gerrys faces on the opening shot to see that there is mischief afoot

[Redblossom]

why is it cheating? i heard  it loud and clear, clean your ears out

[sadie]

Red

Please dont speak to me like that.  I am civil with you.

It is cheating becos:

1)  The interviewer has no background noise.  Her voice comes thru crystal clear.  The Mccanns seemingly have been seated near an ?air con unit which is blasting background noise out.  The producer must have noticed that.  Why  no noise on the interviewers bits.  She cant have been sitting far away?  Not a level playing field.
I could not hear much of what Gerry and Kate were saying.  Others would be the same.  Unfair.

2)  The faces of the Mccanns have been altered on the very first shot to make them look ugly.  Setting up a type of propaganda from the very first shot.  In other words, these people are not nice .... just look at their faces.
Why would anyone want to do that?  Think about it.

3)  The lighting in the early interview is soft and kind to the interviewer, but flat and unkind to the McCanns. 
Is that fair?


Think about it Red.

[Redblossom]

Dont be so silly, and no, why should I think about anything you purport, most of it is nonsense

[sadie]

Cut the abuse Red.  It isn't necessary.



Well. I will tell you what i wonder.  I wonder if the interviewers parts have been rerecorded, maybe in a studio?  Better lighting and sound, then spliced in


The questions and points that she is putting over, may not even be the same as on the original video.


I haven't had time to check the content but at face value, I find that worrying


Room for cheating.



On top of the previous perceived "cheating" what do you think, Red?

[Redblossom]

Erm Sadie, dont get carried away, the specific point here is the one I pointed out about their reply to the question about which of the most important sightings they remembered, the ones they looked at once or twice more than othera, the answers were not muffled, they were clear, its nothng at all to do with the whole video,end of

[sadie]

Pease dont be so dismissive of me. 

I am telling you that I cannot hear what the Mccanns say properly because of background noise.

I am telling you that the interviewer comes over clearly with no back ground noise .. and that she has better lighting .... studio lighting by the looks of things

I am telling you that because of these things + the fact that the opening photo is obviously tampered with to the Mccanns detriment. It seems likely that this video had been seriously tampered with ... and that it is purely adulterated propaganda.  Perhaps the interviewers words have been altered?  Dunno,

.... but it aint a level playing field


Propaganda ........... Same as HiDeHos rubbish