Is a reconstruction a feasible option?

[Samson]

The absence of blood stains pertaining to Nevill is easily explained as he was standing approaching his assailant who retreated backwards out of the bedroom.  We know that blood does not instantly escape from a gunshot wound so if Nevill was standing up while moving forward then the blood would trickle onto his clothes and not onto the floor.

Blood was identified on the wall by the main staircase which was consistent with Nevill staggering downstairs to summon help.  Far from claiming that it simply doesn't work, it works extremely well in my view.

I also think that Jeremy Bamber retreated ahead of Nevill when he unexpectedly ran out of ammo and that it was during this period that Nevill followed him down to the kitchen where the fight and fatal shots occurred.  I also believe that JB went back upstairs and shot June again as she lay injured.

Unexpectedly ran out of ammo? This in a carefully preplanned run of executions?
I see 4 casings outside the bedroom, and any variance might be a kick from an officer during the crime discovery. A crime reconstruction requires a feasible explanation for most things, and this is all explicable by Nevill hearing Sheila making a noise downstairs and Nevill heading down, whether fearing an intruder or knowing it was Sheila.

[Samson]

No.  It is possible for forensics to reconstruct soc using laser technology and bullet trajectory analysis to pinpoint perp and victim location 

NB did both.  He sustained 2 gsw's to his face: lip and jaw, and 2 to his rear: shoulder and elbow/chest graze wound.

Uncontested, a fact. It looks like receiving two shots from front and above unexpectedly, with the victim turning to flee and receiving two shots from the rear and above.

Maybe it is what it looks.

[Samson]

To do so you need to identify the firing point.  In the video the firing point was the open window of the book depository.  Can you identify the firing point at WHF?  Was the rifle at waste level, chin level or anywhere in between?

I don't see a reconstruction as being a feasible option in this case.

Your doubt is steeped in knowledge none is possible without accepting Holly's ideas. The trajectories through bodies are fixed and unmovable, unlike casings at a crime scene. Just one moved by an officer can get Holly's ballistics in order.

[Myster]

Unexpectedly ran out of ammo? This in a carefully preplanned run of executions?
I see 4 casings outside the bedroom, and any variance might be a kick from an officer during the crime discovery. A crime reconstruction requires a feasible explanation for most things, and this is all explicable by Nevill hearing Sheila making a noise downstairs and Nevill heading down, whether fearing an intruder or knowing it was Sheila.

There are only two - DRH/13 & 14, believed to be from two final headshots to June... would you like to borrow my specs, Samson?

[Samson]

There are only two - DRH/13 & 14, believed to be from two final headshots to June... would you like to borrow my specs, Samson?

Trajectories through bodies need explaining, and Nevill approaching and retreating from the bedroom is the broad picture.
Similarly suicide compatible trajectories through Sheila complete a story.
The deaths of Nevill and Sheila are the focus. All others were asleep when first shot.