Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?

[barrier]

If they are not suspects it's suggests they are not being investigated...that's logic not guesswork....f you think they are then you are guessing

Would one expect either the PJ or SY to announce who if anyone is a suspect to satisfy the keyboard warriors.

[Mr Gray]

Would one expect either the PJ or SY to announce who if anyone is a suspect to satisfy the keyboard warriors.

I wouldn't expect them to say anything .....but they have...and their answers are evidence but not proof that the McCanns are not under investigation

[faithlilly]

I wouldn't expect them to say anything .....but they have...and their answers are evidence but not proof that the McCanns are not under investigation

When was the last time anyone from OG said anything ?

Rowley conducted an interview last year but that has since disappeared as has anything relating to OG on the Met’s website.

[Mr Gray]

When was the last time anyone from OG said anything ?

Rowley conducted an interview last year but that has since disappeared as has anything relating to OG on the Met’s website.

If they said something last week you would say it was out of date

[faithlilly]

If they said something last week you would say it was out of date

But they haven’t, have they ?

 Not even an update on the 10th anniversary when you would have thought that it would be seen by the widest audience. In fact absolutely nothing since Redwood left. Very odd considering it is an ongoing investigation.

[jassi]

But they haven’t, have they ?

 Not even an update on the 10th anniversary when you would have thought that it would be seen by the widest audience. In fact absolutely nothing since Redwood left. Very odd considering it is an ongoing investigation.

Maybe everyone has been struck dumb by Redwood's representational skills.

[Alice Purjorick]

1)That's what I have said and explained why... (2)Amaral and sceptics seem to think the report somehow confirms Maddie's DNA...it doesn't

1) Show us where then. Do you deny posting this: "the dna results are not confusing..they are very clear and conclusive"  Reply #264 on: Today at 10:09:26 AM in case it slipped your memory. John Lowe said they were inconclusive. The two comments would seem to be at variance.
2) I think you are mistaken.

[Sunny]

1) Show us where then. Do you deny posting this: "the dna results are not confusing..they are very clear and conclusive"  Reply #264 on: Today at 10:09:26 AM in case it slipped your memory. John Lowe said they were inconclusive. The two comments would seem to be at variance.
2) I think you are mistaken.

Alice you don't understand the DNA results were conclusively inconclusive.

[Mr Gray]

1) Show us where then. Do you deny posting this: "the dna results are not confusing..they are very clear and conclusive"  Reply #264 on: Today at 10:09:26 AM in case it slipped your memory. John Lowe said they were inconclusive. The two comments would seem to be at variance.
2) I think you are mistaken.

Lowe was replying to a question...do the results show the presence of Maddie's DNA...the answer to that is that the results are inconclusive to that specific question...

The DNA results do not confirm the presence of Maddie's DNA...in that respect they are conclusive

I am certainly not mistaken..a glass can be half full and half empty at the same time...no contradiction

[Brietta]

Alice you don't understand the DNA results were conclusively inconclusive.

Why don't you explain in what way they are?

[G-Unit]

The definition of evidence is something that suggests or indicates something is true

The fact that both police forces have made statements... suggests...indicates...supports ..the fact that the McCann's are not being investigated

What do Carmo said suggests, indicates and supports that the parents are not suspects. Period. Anything else is your OPINION.

Your OPINION may be wrong, just as the McCanns discovered following a similar announcement in August 2007;

Kate and Gerry McCann have said they are "heartened" by an assurance from Portuguese police that they are not being considered suspects in the search for their missing daughter Madeleine.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1560117/McCanns-heartened-not-to-be-suspects.html

[pathfinder73]

Lowe was replying to a question...do the results show the presence of Maddie's DNA...the answer to that is that the results are inconclusive to that specific question...

The DNA results do not confirm the presence of Maddie's DNA...in that respect they are conclusive

I am certainly not mistaken..a glass can be half full and half empty at the same time...no contradiction

The DNA could be from Madeleine so stop spreading myths. They were working from an incomplete DNA result!

"However, all of the confirmed DNA components within this result match the corresponding components in the DNA profile of Madeline McCann." https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JOHN_LOWE.htm

[Vertigo Swirl]

Those are your conclusions based on your interpretations of what you have heard and seen. It doesn't mean you're right.

He’s right there is evidence.

[Vertigo Swirl]

What do Carmo said suggests, indicates and supports that the parents are not suspects. Period. Anything else is your OPINION.

Your OPINION may be wrong, just as the McCanns discovered following a similar announcement in August 2007;

Kate and Gerry McCann have said they are "heartened" by an assurance from Portuguese police that they are not being considered suspects in the search for their missing daughter Madeleine.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1560117/McCanns-heartened-not-to-be-suspects.html

At what point will you accept that the McCanns are not police suspects in their child’s disappearance, if ever?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I put the link into my database shortly before posting.

I have no intention of citing this result.

I am neither mistaken nor lying.

You are asserting there is no evidence of activity - without proof.

I am asserting that I have found evidence of activity - without proof.

You either trust me or you don't.

I googled, nothing came up for this year.  I look forward to reading your blog where it will all be revealed.