Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?

[G-Unit]

A belief based on evidence

No it isn't.

[barrier]

Bless you.  Meet you back here in a year’s time and see if you’re still this hopeful. 

What! an annual review to disagree,mind it won't be solved by then maybe shelved though.imo and all that jazz.

[Mr Gray]

No it isn't.

That's your opinion...imo the evidence is overwhelming

You are posting your opinion as fact...it isnt

[Mr Gray]

Given that I said I would not provide a cite, why do you ask?

I would say it's more you cannot provide a cite

[Vertigo Swirl]

Given that I said I would not provide a cite, why do you ask?

How utterly bizarre IMO.

[Mr Gray]

If only you were as hopeful that the child had been found instead of the parents absolved.

I would simply like to see the case solved.... wouldn't bother me in the slightest if the parents were guilty....I just don't see it as a reasonable possibility

[Vertigo Swirl]

At what point, if ever, will you understand what I say? I don't know what the police are investigating and neither do you. You are peddling a belief, not a fact.

What is a fact then, if every fact can at some point in the future be revised?  It is a fact that the police have said the McCanns are not suspects, it is a fact that there is no evidence at all to show that the McCanns are under investigation, quite the contrary, there is evidence that the police decided specifically NOT to reinvestigate them.  When one reviews the evidence one is allowed to draw conclusions without necessarily having the full facts at their disposal.  There is far more evidence pointing to the fact that the McCanns AREN’T being investigated than evidence pointing to the fact that they are.  And that’s a fact!

[Vertigo Swirl]

Because he has nothing else to contribute ?

Insulting.  I have asked for evidence of PJ activity in investigating the case.  We have been informed that a simple google research will reveal all and I was simply asking for confirmation.  You may think it’s OK to insist something is a fact and then refuse to back it up sith a cite, but I believe that is against forum rules.

[Vertigo Swirl]

That is the most accurate observation regarding this whole thread- every thread is about defending the parents even when their behaviour is noted as being inconsistant as parents whos daughter was abducted by 'paedophiles' according to the parents.
.

Utter hogwash, IMO.

[Mr Gray]

What is a fact then, if every fact can at some point in the future be revised?  It is a fact that the police have said the McCanns are not suspects, it is a fact that there is no evidence at all to show that the McCanns are under investigation, quite the contrary, there is evidence that the police decided specifically NOT to reinvestigate them.  When one reviews the evidence one is allowed to draw conclusions without necessarily having the full facts at their disposal.  There is far more evidence pointing to the fact that the McCanns AREN’T being investigated than evidence pointing to the fact that they are.  And that’s a fact!

I don't see any evidence of the parents being investigated but plenty of them not

[barrier]

I would simply like to see the case solved.... wouldn't bother me in the slightest if the parents were guilty....I just don't see it as a reasonable possibility

Come on Dave,you wouldn't liked to be proved wrong.
No doubt some no nort will see that as a slight.

[Vertigo Swirl]

No it isn't.

What evidence is there that the McCanns are currently under investigation?

[G-Unit]

 

What is a fact then, if every fact can at some point in the future be revised?  It is a fact that the police have said the McCanns are not suspects, it is a fact that there is no evidence at all to show that the McCanns are under investigation, quite the contrary, there is evidence that the police decided specifically NOT to reinvestigate them.  When one reviews the evidence one is allowed to draw conclusions without necessarily having the full facts at their disposal. There is far more evidence pointing to the fact that the McCanns AREN’T being investigated than evidence pointing to the fact that they are. And that’s a fact!

Post this evidence then.

[Mr Gray]

Come on Dave,you wouldn't liked to be proved wrong.
No doubt some no nort will see that as a slight.

I have no problem with being proved wrong...I'm simply going with where the evidence points at the moment

[Mr Gray]

Post this evidence then.

It has all been posted many times but you don't accept it