Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?

[Eleanor]

I shall be deleting any further reference to this argument.

[xtina]

How often are us supporters told what we are supposed to believe...quite a lot....

I think that would be the mccs IMO

who tell us what we are supposed to believe.....

[Vertigo Swirl]

Gosh, what a shit storm about nothing.  I apologise unreservedly for asking the question of Faithlilly.  I accept she has NEVER said the McCanns are about to arrested, furthermore I accept she has NEVER believed such a thing were ever likely.  I accept that when she says “Worrying Times” a propos the developments she has noticed on various websites (removal of articles and the like) it just means she is worried about the times.  I agree, the times are worrying.  I am particularly worried about a no deal scenario and global warming., and also about how much I have upset some of my fellow posters on this forum.

Mea mucho culpa.
 

[Vertigo Swirl]

 .....you are funny at times

Only at times?   

[Erngath]

Gosh, what a shit storm about nothing.  I apologise unreservedly for asking the question of Faithlilly.  I accept she has NEVER said the McCanns are about to arrested, furthermore I accept she has NEVER believed such a thing were ever likely.  I accept that when she says “Worrying Times” a propos the developments she has noticed on various websites (removal of articles and the like) it just means she is worried about the times.  I agree, the times are worrying.  I am particularly worried about a no deal scenario and global warming., and also about how much I have upset some of my fellow posters on this forum.

Mea mucho culpa.
 

A fulsome and very contrite apology.
 

I made a similar apology over much ado about nothing..

Keeps some happy.

[Erngath]

I think that would be the mccs IMO

who tell us what we are supposed to believe.....

Guess that's working with NSY...........so far.

[xtina]

Guess that's working with NSY...........so far.

Only so far......so do you have your fingers crossed...

SY doesn't change there mind....

because they haven't got very far have they....

believing ....what the mccs want us to believe IMO

[Erngath]

Only so far......so do you have your fingers crossed...

SY doesn't change there mind....

because they haven't got very far have they....

believing ....what the mccs want us to believe IMO

I assume you believe what ga wants you and others to believe in his book.


I've no idea of how far Scotland Yard have progressed in their investigation.

[xtina]

I assume you believe what ga wants you and others to believe in his book.


I've no idea of how far Scotland Yard have progressed in their investigation.

I assume you believe what ga wants you and others to believe in his book.


You assumed wrong....

I came to what I believe ....all by my self....

I don't agree with everything GA wrote...

For one I believe maddie was disposed of that day/night....imo

IMO...SY are not only dodgig bullet...

but also not investigating what happened that night....imo

[Erngath]

I assume you believe what ga wants you and others to believe in his book.


You assumed wrong....

I came to what I believe ....all by my self....

I don't agree with everything GA wrote...

For one I believe maddie was disposed of that day/night....imo

IMO...SY are not only dodgig bullet...

but also not investigating what happened that night....imo

So why do you assume that I and other supporters believe the parents of Madeleine are not involved in her disappearance, not because we arrived at that decision by ourselves, but rather because we believe "what the MCCs want us to believe"

[xtina]

So why do you assume that I and other supporters believe the parents of Madeleine are not involved in her disappearance, not because we arrived at that decision by ourselves, but rather because we believe "what the MCCs want us to believe"

So why do you assume that I and other supporters believe the parents


Look....you have assumed wrong again....

You asked me if it was GA book that influenced me...

I told you it wasn't ....

OK, you came to your own conclusion all by your self....

[G-Unit]

So why do you assume that I and other supporters believe the parents of Madeleine are not involved in her disappearance, not because we arrived at that decision by ourselves, but rather because we believe "what the MCCs want us to believe"

If you believe the abduction story you're believing what the McCanns want you to believe. It's their story and the only 'evidence' supporting it has been provided by them. The only 'evidence' ruling out woke and wandered was provided by them. It was their lawyers who found 'evidence' aimed at discrediting Grime's dogs.

Amaral and his colleagues looked at the evidence before them and rejected the McCanns abduction story.  He gave his opinion about what happened in his book. Others looked at the evidence and also rejected the abduction story. That doesn't mean they accepted Amaral's theory, however.

[Mr Gray]

If you believe the abduction story you're believing what the McCanns want you to believe. It's their story and the only 'evidence' supporting it has been provided by them. The only 'evidence' ruling out woke and wandered was provided by them. It was their lawyers who found 'evidence' aimed at discrediting Grime's dogs.

Amaral and his colleagues looked at the evidence before them and rejected the McCanns abduction story.  He gave his opinion about what happened in his book. Others looked at the evidence and also rejected the abduction story. That doesn't mean they accepted Amaral's theory, however.

No one has tried to discredit the dogs....they've just told the truth.... amaral says the dogs have solved 200 cases...he says Eddie found a body under a slab of concrete at Jersey..he says the dogs have never been wrong...the pj files say the dogs alerted to cadaver odour...it's all rubbish...bout time you realised

There are no real grounds to reject the abduction theory

[Mr Gray]

If you believe the abduction story you're believing what the McCanns want you to believe. It's their story and the only 'evidence' supporting it has been provided by them. The only 'evidence' ruling out woke and wandered was provided by them. It was their lawyers who found 'evidence' aimed at discrediting Grime's dogs.

Amaral and his colleagues looked at the evidence before them and rejected the McCanns abduction story.  He gave his opinion about what happened in his book. Others looked at the evidence and also rejected the abduction story. That doesn't mean they accepted Amaral's theory, however.

Then we have...amarals words..

e. Eddie alerts that the car key and the boot had been in contact with a dead body.


It's absolute rubbish...his theory is not based on evidence...it's based on lies


Then we have...

27.23 – The dogs’ reaction is revealing. These dogs have never failed in over 200 case


More rubbish

[Brietta]

The topic is ... Has Scotland Yard dodged a bullet in the Maddie case?
Please confine discussion to that.  Thank you all.