Author Topic: The Madeleine Fund beginnings.  (Read 24826 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The Madeleine Fund beginnings.
« Reply #105 on: October 16, 2018, 10:03:51 PM »
Sorry rob I have only just noticed this post. I put them all one one. Oops.
It is all good.  But do you really expect answers to your questions?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Sunny

Re: The Madeleine Fund beginnings.
« Reply #106 on: October 16, 2018, 10:08:40 PM »
It is all good.  But do you really expect answers to your questions?

They weren't questions Rob they were reasonable requests for cites which as per forum rules should have been provided.  I didn't expect this to happen as I find that some supporters (not all) seem to despise the provision of cites and some moderators don't enforce it.
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The Madeleine Fund beginnings.
« Reply #107 on: October 16, 2018, 10:13:48 PM »
They weren't questions Rob they were reasonable requests for cites which as per forum rules should have been provided.  I didn't expect this to happen as I find that some supporters (not all) seem to despise the provision of cites and some moderators don't enforce it.
How were we to enforce it?  But if you really think the claim needs an answer, I'd start a new thread and let the topic be discussed.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Sunny

Re: The Madeleine Fund beginnings.
« Reply #108 on: October 16, 2018, 10:17:49 PM »
How were we to enforce it?  But if you really think the claim needs an answer, I'd start a new thread and let the topic be discussed.
What is the point if it isn't enforced though Rob.  Only Misty has made an attempt to provide a cite and the others? Nothing and no penalties. It looks like to me like some supporters can't discuss things reasonably.
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The Madeleine Fund beginnings.
« Reply #109 on: October 16, 2018, 10:23:15 PM »
What is the point if it isn't enforced though Rob.  Only Misty has made an attempt to provide a cite and the others? Nothing and no penalties. It looks like to me like some supporters can't discuss things reasonably.
There was no easy method of enforcing it.  We were asked to delete the post with the claim.  Major problem going back to find it.  I don't have the time to do that.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Madeleine Fund beginnings.
« Reply #110 on: October 16, 2018, 11:57:36 PM »
They weren't questions Rob they were reasonable requests for cites which as per forum rules should have been provided.  I didn't expect this to happen as I find that some supporters (not all) seem to despise the provision of cites and some moderators don't enforce it.

Some Moderators know that Cites have already been provided.

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Madeleine Fund beginnings.
« Reply #111 on: October 17, 2018, 12:34:47 AM »

So yet more rubbish designed to derail discussion.  Why is that, I wonder?

This is a Discussion Forum.  Absolutes are impossible  to prove and actually not required  anyway, since they are mostly impossible to prove.

So could we get back to what we think might have happened, without any Libellous intention.  There is too much Libel going on here for my liking.  And I am no longer prepared to tolerate this.

I am a Senior Moderator, and I didn't get there by being biased toward my own kind.  So do be warned.  I will no longer be quite so kind.

Offline sadie

Re: The Madeleine Fund beginnings.
« Reply #112 on: October 17, 2018, 01:18:27 AM »
OK Davel I will provide cites (of my cite requests) on a new thread. Then on that same thread I will share all the times I have requested cites from yourself and failed to have them.  You will reciprocate by removing all the posts that I requested cites to- or actually giving me the requested cites.

Is that a deal?

Yet you have failed to give cites, at least once when I have aked for them, and that was since your new signature.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Madeleine Fund beginnings.
« Reply #113 on: October 17, 2018, 07:36:45 AM »
They weren't questions Rob they were reasonable requests for cites which as per forum rules should have been provided.  I didn't expect this to happen as I find that some supporters (not all) seem to despise the provision of cites and some moderators don't enforce it.
How would you like it if I asked you for a cite every time you write a post?  In this instance I demand cites for supprters seeimg to despise the provision of cites and some moderators not enforcing cite provision.  Perhaps Rob could start a new thread for my request?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Lace

Re: The Madeleine Fund beginnings.
« Reply #114 on: October 17, 2018, 08:55:44 AM »
OK This one does work

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/FUND_2017.htm

Page 5 but I am sure you both already know that by now.

What do you mean 'I am sure you both already know that by now'    the other link definitely did not work for me.  This one does.    They are paying Duarte money she had earned over a number of years,   she was helping the McCann's.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Madeleine Fund beginnings.
« Reply #115 on: October 17, 2018, 09:28:21 AM »
What do you mean 'I am sure you both already know that by now'    the other link definitely did not work for me.  This one does.    They are paying Duarte money she had earned over a number of years,   she was helping the McCann's.

The Fund was paying legal expenses incurred by the McCann family, not by the Fund itself. If I was a director of a company I wouldn't expect the company to pay for me to sue someone for libelling me. 
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The Madeleine Fund beginnings.
« Reply #116 on: October 17, 2018, 09:30:09 AM »
How would you like it if I asked you for a cite every time you write a post?  In this instance I demand cites for supprters seeimg to despise the provision of cites and some moderators not enforcing cite provision.  Perhaps Rob could start a new thread for my request?
We don't ask for cites for opinions. 

When Sunny says "I didn't expect this to happen as I find that some supporters (not all) seem to despise the provision of cites and some moderators don't enforce it", that is obvious her opinion.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2018, 09:32:54 AM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline xtina

Re: The Madeleine Fund beginnings.
« Reply #117 on: October 17, 2018, 10:21:11 AM »
What do you mean 'I am sure you both already know that by now'    the other link definitely did not work for me.  This one does.    They are paying Duarte money she had earned over a number of years,   she was helping the McCann's.


IMO this is why the fund was started in the first place....

and made into a private company.

how does anyone know what that money was spent on....








« Last Edit: October 17, 2018, 12:59:04 PM by John »
Always listen to both sides of the story before you judge.

The first storyteller you will always find has modified the story, for there benefit BE WISE.

Offline Brietta

Re: The Madeleine Fund beginnings.
« Reply #118 on: October 17, 2018, 10:48:48 AM »

IMO this is why the fund was started in the first place....

and made into a private company.

how does anyone know what that money was spent on....

Hmmm ... that explains why Kate deposited the profits from her best selling book into the fund set up for Madeleine.

Bit of a strange way of getting her hands on her own money I would have thought ... but it takes all kinds 
« Last Edit: October 17, 2018, 12:59:36 PM by John »
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Madeleine Fund beginnings.
« Reply #119 on: October 17, 2018, 11:29:51 AM »
Hmmm ... that explains why Kate deposited the profits from her best selling book into the fund set up for Madeleine.

Bit of a strange way of getting her hands on her own money I would have thought ... but it takes all kinds 🤣

This post is my opinion only.

If all my efforts were directed at convincing people that I was innocent of any wrongdoing I would need to appear to be beyond reproach. Writing a book and donating all the profits to a good cause might give that impression.

If my family and I are able to influence how my donation is used, and if I and my family benefit from that use, then
my actions might be seen as self-interested rather than philanthropic.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0