Netflix launches new 8-part documentary about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Also, according to this the police broke their own judicial secrecy here.  Which is more concerning - a private comment to a confidant or information given to the world’s press by a policeman?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1560443/Madeleine-sniffer-dogs-detect-scent-of-body.html

[Eleanor]

What date did the McCanns visit Freud, with cites please - Rob please ask Faithlilly to provide, thanks

I can't remember, but I do know that everybody knew about The Dogs almost immediately afterwards.

And how is this rubbish going to prove that The McCanns are guilty?

[The General]

Sir Clement Freud reaches out to the parents of a missing child.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I can't remember, but I do know that everybody knew about The Dogs almost immediately afterwards.

And how is this rubbish going to prove that The McCanns are guilty?

I’ve checked with the source document and the comment Faithlilly claims prove that Kate broke judicial secrecy was made in early September, several weeks after thr PJ allegedly broke their own judicial secrecy.

[faithlilly]

I can't remember, but I do know that everybody knew about The Dogs almost immediately afterwards.

And how is this rubbish going to prove that The McCanns are guilty?

It doesn’t but with does dilute accusations of the breaking of judicial secrecy by others.

[Eleanor]

It doesn’t but with does dilute accusations of the breaking of judicial secrecy by others.

But surely The PJ were by honour bound should not have done this?

[faithlilly]

But surely The PJ were by honour bound should not have done this?

And surely the parents of a missing child would not seek to jeopardise the investigation into their child’s disappearance? Surely they would do everything to insure the integrity of that investigation?

[Eleanor]

And surely the parents of a missing child would not seek to jeopardise the investigation into their child’s disappearance? Surely they would do everything to insure the integrity of that investigation?

I think it was already too late by then, don't you?

[ShiningInLuz]

But surely The PJ were by honour bound should not have done this?

I am following a very interesting, active murder case in Portugal.  It has only tenuous connections to MBM, and none to do with the thread title, so I will keep this short and simple.

One of the defendants has been writing extensively to the media.

The media always seem to know when and where said defendant is turning up for a hearing.  AKA photo opportunity.  And more.

Judicial secrecy is not a one-way street.

[faithlilly]

I think it was already too late by then, don't you?

That does not negate the responsibilities of the parents.

[Eleanor]

I am following a very interesting, active murder case in Portugal.  It has only tenuous connections to MBM, and none to do with the thread title, so I will keep this short and simple.

One of the defendants has been writing extensively to the media.

The media always seem to know when and where said defendant is turning up for a hearing.  AKA photo opportunity.  And more.

Judicial secrecy is not a one-way street.

It should be for those who are employed to uphold The Law.  What do you expect the hoi poloi to do if The Judicial System is leaking like a sieve?

[sadie]

I’ve checked with the source document and the comment Faithlilly claims prove that Kate broke judicial secrecy was made in early September, several weeks after thr PJ allegedly broke their own judicial secrecy.

Sorry, I can't provide a cite, cos I don't know where I found it

BUT

About 4 days ago when  I was wandering about the internet, I read that the TV interviewer who gave Kate and Gerry such a bad time, Sandra Felgueiras, is now very angry.   Because now she knows that she had been told lies  about the dogs 'findings' and the DNA results and she based her, imo, very aggressive interviews upon the so called 'facts' presented to her by the authorities.

I would love to find the article/report because I would like confirming what I think I remember.  Which was that she now believes the Mccanns innocent and that she no longer trusts Amaral

[Robittybob1]

I’ve checked with the source document and the comment Faithlilly claims prove that Kate broke judicial secrecy was made in early September, several weeks after thr PJ allegedly broke their own judicial secrecy.

I'm trying to find the actual dates.  What document do you refer to as the "source document".

[Erngath]

Sorry, I can't provide a cite, cos I don't know where I found it

BUT

About 4 days ago when  I was wandering about the internet, I read that the TV interviewer who gave Kate and Gerry such a bad time, Sandra Felgueiras, is now very angry.   Because now she knows that she had been told lies  about the dogs 'findings' and the DNA results and she based her, imo, very aggressive interviews upon the so called 'facts' presented to her by the authorities.

I would love to find the article/report because I would like confirming what I think I remember.  Which was that she now believes the Mccanns innocent and that she no longer trusts Amaral

The interview was given as part of the Netflix documentary.
I saw it but am unsure of which episode it was in.

[Mr Gray]

And surely the parents of a missing child would not seek to jeopardise the investigation into their child’s disappearance? Surely they would do everything to insure the integrity of that investigation?

The integrity of the investigation involving almeida... Convicted of torture...amaral convicted if false testimony... Perjury... I think the integrity  of the investigation was, already compromised