Sceptics beliefs ?

[Wonderfulspam]

Oops, changing the subject are we?  Nice move. 

I assumed we'd finished that part of the discussion, since I am right & you are wrong.

[barrier]

As is the witness description of Kate & Gerry carrying a big black bag & acting suspiciously.

Smithman, don't forget Smithman.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I assumed we'd finished that part of the discussion, since I am right & you are wrong.

What am I wrong about, exactly?

[faithlilly]

Does he really ... where can I read that?

The article does say ...
Snip
It was the first time the McCanns’ friends had been named in public, but Sol’s journalist Felicia Cabrita had their names and phone numbers and details from their witness statements. She had called them all, and at least one other witness, Jes Wilkins.

The information had been handed to Cabrita by the police – she says she acquired the material through good journalism, which in a sense it was – and her source is widely believed by her colleagues to have been the former head of the inquiry, Goncalo Amaral.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/kate-and-gerry-mccann-beyond-the-smears-8hlc6qx7k70

But we knew that already.

Widely believed by her colleagues? Must be true then.

[Wonderfulspam]

Smithman, don't forget Smithman.

I hadn't. I was saving him for later, him & his child wearing the wrong jammies.

[Brietta]

As is the witness description of Kate & Gerry carrying a big black bag & acting suspiciously.

Kate mentioned the ridiculous claim in her book ... where does your witness statement appear in the files? 

[Wonderfulspam]

What am I wrong about, exactly?

Abduction for a start.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Widely believed by her colleagues? Must be true then.

More than likely.

[Wonderfulspam]

Kate mentioned the ridiculous claim in her book ... where does your witness statement appear in the files?

In the same part of the files where the note left in reception is found, I'd imagine

[Brietta]

In the same part of the files where the note left in reception is found, I'd imagine

Another non-existent witness?  Amaral certainly used anonymous 'witnesses' to great effect to bolster his lies but we are expected to be able to prove our claims.

[Wonderfulspam]

Another non-existent witness?  Amaral certainly used anonymous 'witnesses' to great effect to bolster his lies but we are expected to be able to prove our claims.

Kate claimed the witness exists, so it must be true.

[Mr Gray]

i think I can say with certainty taht whilst posters here and elsewhere havent moved on from gemmied shutters in the last 12 years ...SY and the PJ have

[Vertigo Swirl]

In the same part of the files where the note left in reception is found, I'd imagine

If there was no note left in reception in the files and Kate is lying then the police have her bang to rights.  Why would you lie about something that is so very easily verifiable by the boys in blue?  Do you think she WANTS them to suspect her?

[The General]

i think I can say with certainty taht whilst posters here and elsewhere havent moved on from gemmied shutters in the last 12 years ...SY and the PJ have

So we're happy now then that the burglarductor(s) made good their escape through the patio door and not the non-jemmied window?

[Wonderfulspam]

If there was no note left in reception in the files and Kate is lying then the police have her bang to rights.  Why would you lie about something that is so very easily verifiable by the boys in blue?  Do you think she WANTS them to suspect her?

What could they possibly charge her with?