Mr Horrocks says "there is not one shred of credible evidence, either direct or otherwise" to implicate the McCanns in Madeleine's disappearance."
He also dismisses paedophile rings and people traffickers as not credible; burglar turning abductor is unlikely; being knocked down while wandering is not realistic.
Having disposed of all these possibilities by giving his opinion he then gives us his opinion on what did happen. What he doesn't do is present any credible evidence to support his speculations.
Interestingly he speaks of a "UK based psychologist" muddying the waters in the first investigation. I think he's referring to the one who picked up on the inconsistencies in statements.
He also criticises Op Grange for digging up the ground in PdL as " unnecessary, and an example of resources being misused"
I do agree with this;
"everyone who was in the Ocean Club and nearby at the time have been identified and interviewed, whether they were there as guests, residents or even staff. However, it is my belief that this may still not be the case."
Given the lack of evidence for his speculations I think he had a cheek to say that Grange's "critical leads"" should be "based on evidence, as opposed to speculation and guesswork."
Talk about do as he says not as he does!!
