I could provide a million cites with i depth analysis but what would be the point? You simply don’t accept it and that is that.
How I like to look at it is say we managed to burn down every single tree on the planet. Would that have any effect on the climate? If not somebody please explain why not? If it would have an effect then we are acknowledging that human actions can have consequences for the climate, something which sceptics refuse to accept.
Well a hypothesis is just that. What if's.. not an exact science.
How I like to look at it is this what do humans require to survive?
The very basics:
Water- needs to be clean
Food- needs to be produced
Protection from the weather- regardless where on the planet you live. needs to be produced
We do not need houses or cars or planes or phones for basic survival however, as we have evolved these
things and
stuff have become necessities.
It is also worth remembering another thesis: where did humans come from?
It is believed by me and many like minded people that when our galaxy was created we were a solid ice planet to begin with, as we were within the suns rays and heat source the planet earth got warmer- the ice began to melt. Seas and oceans were sprouting plant life under these waters> followed by micro creatures (bacteria) then came a more solid form bottom feeders then many sea creatures were created followed by amphibians who could survive under and out of water etc and so on.
Now these creatures has no influence over their environment as we do today and yet the planet got warmer- AND don't forget we have seasons as well.
It is not wise to claim the north and south pole is melting during the summer. It always does!!!!