A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?

[Holly Goodhead]

In Your Opinion.

Opinion about what?  The MW listening service is not my opinion it is fact based set out in the brochure.  The service involved parents leaving their children asleep in secured holiday accommodation whilst they dined out of an evening.  'Listeners' would then patrol the relevant accommodation by listening outside secured accommodation for any disturbance eg crying.  In the event of any such disturbance the parents would be contacted and return to the accommodation to resettle their children.  This is a wholly different arrangement from the one orchestrated by GM/KM/MO/RO/ROB and JT.

[Mr Gray]

Do you have any evidence of anyone anywhere leaving small children night after night in an unlocked holiday apartment whilst the parents dined out and where the parents could not possibly see/hear what was going on?

We were discussing the culture of babylistening..... Not specifically the mccanns.. As I've said twice now... That's what my post relates to

[Mr Gray]

Opinion about what?  The MW listening service is not my opinion it is fact based set out in the brochure.  The service involved parents leaving their children asleep in secured holiday accommodation whilst they dined out of an evening.  'Listeners' would then patrol the relevant accommodation by listening outside secured accommodation for any disturbance eg crying.  In the event of any such disturbance the parents would be contacted and return to the accommodation to resettle their children.  This is a wholly different arrangement from the one orchestrated by GM/KM/MO/RO/ROB and JT.

Opinion that the mccanns arrangement was a complete aberration ...more a variation.. Imo

[Holly Goodhead]

Opinion that the mccanns arrangement was a complete aberration ...more a variation.. Imo

So you think some parents leave children under 4 yoa in unlocked holiday accommodation whilst they dine out at a venue where the distance was such they cannot possibly know what was going on?

Since the advent of mass tourism no British family has gone on holiday anywhere in the world and had to return home with one child fewer than they departed with.  I would suggest the reason for this is that would be abductors are not presented with low risk opportunities ie very small children home alone in unsecured holiday accommodation.

[Mr Gray]

So you think some parents leave children under 4 yoa in unlocked holiday accommodation whilst they dine out at a venue where the distance was such they cannot possibly know what was going on?

Since the advent of mass tourism no British family has gone on holiday anywhere in the world and had to return home with one child fewer than they departed with.  I would suggest the reason for this is that would be abductors are not presented with low risk opportunities ie very small children home alone in unsecured holiday accommodation.

What I think is exactly what I have posted....plus if Maddie was abducted the unlocked door may have played no part.
Your post illustrates how unlikely abduction was which is probably why the mccanns didn't consider it

[Lace]

How terribly helpful all those sightings have been, hence the reason Maddie is home safe & we.....Oh,  no wait. that's right.

Are you feeling smug that Madeleine isn't home?   Some sightings may well have been Madeleine,  the Police arrived too late to some of them and in others there was no video camera to search.

[Eleanor]

Opinion about what?  The MW listening service is not my opinion it is fact based set out in the brochure.  The service involved parents leaving their children asleep in secured holiday accommodation whilst they dined out of an evening.  'Listeners' would then patrol the relevant accommodation by listening outside secured accommodation for any disturbance eg crying.  In the event of any such disturbance the parents would be contacted and return to the accommodation to resettle their children.  This is a wholly different arrangement from the one orchestrated by GM/KM/MO/RO/ROB and JT.

A Complete Aberration.

[Lace]

What, no sightings whatsoever? Lord Lucan still gets a smattering of sightings to this day.

He gets sightings as the case was made public,  even now on the anniversary of his disappearance somewhere there will be a story.

[The General]

What I think is exactly what I have posted....plus if Maddie was abducted the unlocked door may have played no part.
Your post illustrates how unlikely abduction was which is probably why the mccanns didn't consider it

Let's use this 'logic' then. So what is way more likely? That by leaving the door open she could literally just get up and go out. Did they 'consider' this? What did they 'consider'?

[Mr Gray]

Let's use this 'logic' then. So what is way more likely? That by leaving the door open she could literally just get up and go out. Did they 'consider' this? What did they 'consider'?

The point im making is that the unlocked door may or may not have played any part. I would be interested to know what was the point of entry in the previous burglaries we have been told happened. If it was raised shutters taht would certainly add credence to the McCanns account

[Vertigo Swirl]

My guess is the children left under this MW arrangement were not as young as the children of T9 but regardless 'the listeners' were listening behind locked doors which is a wholly different arrangement to what the McCanns were doing and possibly the others too if they were slipping up the back passage and thru patio doors.  Also as I understand it 'the listeners' were on constant patrol not checking every 30 mins.  Plus I doubt the parents using this arrangement used it every night maybe one or twice to have some adult time.

The McCanns evening childcare arrangements were a complete aberration.

I get the feeling you enjoy writing “slipping up the back passage” quite alot.

[Miss Taken Identity]

I missed something? what is bad about discussing a passageway with reference to child security?

Some people just get upset at the least thing... seriously!

[Vertigo Swirl]

I missed something? what is bad about discussing a passageway with reference to child security?

Some people just get upset at the least thing... seriously!

[Miss Taken Identity]

The post was explained to me- smutty minds to find innocent post with sexual connotations and attribute it to the author.

Lewd, and disgusting interpretation.In Many peoples opinion.

[Mr Gray]

The post was explained to me- smutty minds to find innocent post with sexual connotations and attribute it to the author.

Lewd, and disgusting interpretation.In Many peoples opinion.

When someone wants to talk about their underwear....has a name of Holly Goodhead...ask someone what that means...and talks about slipping up back passsages...you'd have to be  bit thick not to realise it was intentional.

Its al Carry on up the Khyber Holly humour...