A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?

[Wonderfulspam]

No-one in the Smith family made the connection between the man they had seen and Madeleine's disappearance until Peter wondered if he had dreamt the encounter a fortnight after the event.

Yes, but that doesn't mean it wasn't Gerry.

[Mr Gray]

Yes, but that doesn't mean it wasn't Gerry.

How very celestial teapot.. My poor typing almost resulted in celestial toss pot... Fortunately I corrected it

[G-Unit]

Kate wrote in her book

• they did not know what happened to Madeleine
• there was no evidence that she had come to serious harm

As far as I know that information remains exactly the same today as it was then.  So what is this campaign to prove the death of a person really all about.
Is it all to benefit the egotistical theories of a very troubled (if he's not - in my opinion he should be) man.

Do you think Amaral should have been censored then?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Do you think Amaral should have been censored then?

You either believe it’s ok to publicly besmirch the reputation of others on the basis of scant evidence (think Cliff Richard or Chris Jeffries) or you don’t.   I don’t, how about you?

[Holly Goodhead]

Do you think Amaral should have been censored then?

I woz 

I think freedom of speech should reign supreme. 

[Mr Gray]

Do you think Amaral should have been censored then?

I think what he said was libelous and therefore contrary to the law... The SC made, a, very poor judgement imo but hopefully the ECHR will produce a correct interpretation of the law

[Mr Gray]

I woz 

I think freedom of speech should reign supreme.

No it shouldn't.. According to the ECHR

[Holly Goodhead]

You either believe it’s ok to publicly besmirch the reputation of others on the basis of scant evidence (think Cliff Richard or Chris Jeffries) or you don’t.   I don’t, how about you?

I'm not sure how our community here compares with the might of the Murdoch press? 

I see our community here akin to chatting down the local boozer or coffee shop.

[Holly Goodhead]

No it shouldn't.. According to the ECHR

I thought ECHR ruled freedom of speech should take precedence?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I'm not sure how our community here compares with the might of the Murdoch press? 

I see our community here akin to chatting down the local boozer or coffee shop.

Who was talking about our community?  Amaral is not part of our community!
PS: you beliefs are at odds with the forum owner’s.

[Brietta]

Yes, but that doesn't mean it wasn't Gerry.

I think you may have passed by a post of mine which is less to your liking http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11042.msg565468#msg565468 but which may have more relevance to the thread and fantastic theories ?? shared by you and Amaral.
I think if you go back and read it you will see that false memory might be to blame for quite a few of Amaral's and your misunderstanding of the events you both seem determined to misrepresent.

[Wonderfulspam]

I think you may have passed by a post of mine which is less to your liking http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11042.msg565468#msg565468 but which may have more relevance to the thread and fantastic theories ?? shared by you and Amaral.
I think if you go back and read it you will see that false memory might be to blame for quite a few of Amaral's and your misunderstanding of the events you both seem determined to misrepresent.

I could go back & read your post.

But why would I bother,

[Mr Gray]

I thought ECHR ruled freedom of speech should take precedence?

Absolutely not.. You need to read what the ECHR says

[Brietta]

Do you think Amaral should have been censored then?

Please refer to http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11042.msg565478#msg565478 I certainly couldn't have put it any better than that.

[Brietta]

I could go back & read your post.

But why would I bother,

Please desist from posting libel or I and other monitors who see them will be forced to delete your contributions containing them such as the one above.