Jeremy Bamber’s Proven Lies

[ISpyWithMyEye]

It certainly isn't just women. Have a good look around the internet !

The majority are women.

There’s a few men, but they may be gay...it’s alleged Jeremy is bisexual.

And some of the men who are sucked in by Jeremy are either thick, or ex-criminals themselves who probably cooked a deal with jeremy that if they helped him get out Jeremy would give them a good few grand.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

How do you know that Jeremy Bamber is twisting minds?

Well, YOU believe him...there’s your answer

[G-Unit]

There is no 'think' about it.

How many have agreed that they were 'persuaded' by Jeremy Bamber?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

How many have agreed that they were 'persuaded' by Jeremy Bamber?

Jeremy grooms certain types: the gullible, lonely, less bright, dowdy...the easy to manipulate

None of them would agree they were persuaded by Jeremy Bamber, because they don’t realise they’ve been brainwashed




Off topic, but I bet Jeremy hated that picture below, where he’s handcuffed to the police officer . That policeman is REALLY handsome. He has wonderful bone structure, amazing eyes (and much taller than Jeremy too), and he makes Jeremy look positively ordinary in comparison.

Jeremy was TERRIBLY vain, so I bet he spat feathers when saw such a handsome police officer stood next to him in that picture.

[attachment deleted by admin]

[G-Unit]

Well, YOU believe him...there’s your answer

No, you just think I do.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

No, you just think I do.

Well, you have a strange way of admitting he’s guilty

[G-Unit]

Well, you have a strange way of admitting he’s guilty

So if I don't 'admit' he's guilty it's because he's 'persuaded' poor old  gullible, lonely, less bright and dowdy me of his innocence and I'm not bright enough to realise it? In your opinion, that is.

[Caroline]

How many have agreed that they were 'persuaded' by Jeremy Bamber?

Where do you think an innocent Bamber originated from? People wouldn't admit it because most people don't like to admit they were persuaded by anyone. Then again, some may have but I haven't counted them - silly question all round G.

[G-Unit]

Where do you think an innocent Bamber originated from? People wouldn't admit it because most people don't like to admit they were persuaded by anyone. Then again, some may have but I haven't counted them - silly question all round G.

Just as silly in my opinion as those who claim to 'know' what motivates others.

[APRIL]

Just as silly in my opinion as those who claim to 'know' what motivates others.

Well, as none of Jeremy's can be said to have been altruistic, it limits any positive motivation, which leaves us with the self oriented, of which there are only finite from which to choose.

[Caroline]

Just as silly in my opinion as those who claim to 'know' what motivates others.

Really? So when the police look for a motive they are just being silly? 

[G-Unit]

Really? So when the police look for a motive they are just being silly? 

I never mentioned the police, just posters on a forum who think they 'know' what others are motivated by.

[Caroline]

I never mentioned the police, just posters on a forum who think they 'know' what others are motivated by.

Such as 'emotional abuse'? 

[APRIL]

I never mentioned the police, just posters on a forum who think they 'know' what others are motivated by.

Given that there is always a limit on how many motivations there are, as it's quite possible to eliminate several, it actually leave very few alternatives.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

CAL makes contradictory statements. On page 334 it says he said he used the bathroom window to enter WHF on the weekend of 15/16th September, but the records of the surveillance team place him in London on both evenings.

Reading the reference she has inserted on page 335, however; reference no 7, its says the surveillance ended at 1.30am on 16th September, which means he wasn't being watched on 16th.

Further to my previous response,  prior to Jeremy being arrested and charged with mass murder on Sunday 29th September, 1985 at Dover, he’d rented accommodation for 10 nights in St Tropez, then add in their drive to and from the south of France including stopovers en-route, he must have left England for France on or around the 16th...which would account for why it was noted the surveillance ended in London on that date: the surveillance team were following him to St Tropez.

The team knew where he was heading having bugged the flat and landline — and following all his movements — hence why the ST had their passports to follow him to France.

I hope that’s cleared it up for you 🙂