Is there any evidence which implicates Sheila?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Oh yes. It was something Jeremy mentioned in particular as being too valuable to be destroyed. There was also a collection of silver pieces.

Would Julie have known about the existence of these things in order to be able to make up such a story?

[Caroline]

Would Julie have known about the existence of these things in order to be able to make up such a story?

No, not without being told.

[Vertigo Swirl]

No, not without being told.

The more little details like this I discover the more blindingly obvious it becomes who did it.  Still, I expect his supporters have an explanation for every single one of them and I look forward to hearing this one.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I would also really be horrified  to think that within 24 hours of my death that one of my kids would see fit to euthanaise my beloved pet.  There is simply no excuse for that whatsoever imo, apart from a complete absence of humanity.  Again, I’m sure Jeremy’s supporters find his actions quite defensible, and remind us that “just because he had the dog put down, etc...”. Add it to the long list of “just becauses”.

[barrier]

The more little details like this I discover the more blindingly obvious it becomes who did it.  Still, I expect his supporters have an explanation for every single one of them and I look forward to hearing this one.

It all adds up,little by little,just looking at the exchanges here from those more knowledgeable points more conclusively to his guilt,not that its in doubt.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It all adds up,little by little,just looking at the exchanges here from those more knowledgeable points more conclusively to his guilt,not that its in doubt.

Yes, there are dozens of these little red flags, which collectively amount to a veritable bunting of evidence of guilt compared to virtually nothing pointing in the opposite direction to Sheila.

[Holly Goodhead]

I would also really be horrified  to think that within a few days of my death that one of my kids would see fit to euthanaise my beloved pet.  There is simply no excuse for that whatsoever imo, apart from a complete absence of humanity.  Again, I’m sure Jeremy’s supporters find his actions quite defensible, and remind us that “just because he had the dog put down, etc...”. Add it to the long list of “just becauses”.

For those who think JB was responsible why didn't he simply shoot Crispy?

He lived alone in a cottage.  If he wanted a dog he would have had one of his own.

To my mind its interesting to note that June's side of the family were keen to have her jewellery but not so keen to take her little dog Crispy.

The lab, Jasper, who lived outside, was rehomed on another farm.

[Holly Goodhead]

No, not without being told.

What revelations did JM make that could be corroborated and/or she did not learn from others?

[Vertigo Swirl]

For those who think JB was responsible why didn't he simply shoot Crispy?

He lived alone in a cottage.  If he wanted a dog he would have had one of his own.

To my mind its interesting to note that June's side of the family were keen to have her jewellery but not so keen to take her little dog Crispy.

The lab, Jasper, who lived outside, was rehomed on another farm.

Perhaps it simply didn’t occur to him to shoot the dog at the time, or perhaps the dog was cowering under the bed and he couldn’t be bothered to try and get at him.  Nevertheless he DID kill the dog within 24 hours without any apparent sentimentality or conscience at all.  If you knew that your next of kin would do the same to your most beloved pet within 24 hours of your death what would you think of them, seriously?

[APRIL]

It all adds up,little by little,just looking at the exchanges here from those more knowledgeable points more conclusively to his guilt,not that its in doubt.

Exactly. Each individual incident can have a reasonable explanation applied to it, but when all such incidents are put together, the picture takes on different hues.

[Holly Goodhead]

The more little details like this I discover the more blindingly obvious it becomes who did it.  Still, I expect his supporters have an explanation for every single one of them and I look forward to hearing this one.

I think it's fair to point out that for many years April and Caroline were "supporters" arguing against all the arguments they now advocate. 

[APRIL]

For those who think JB was responsible why didn't he simply shoot Crispy?

He lived alone in a cottage.  If he wanted a dog he would have had one of his own.

To my mind its interesting to note that June's side of the family were keen to have her jewellery but not so keen to take her little dog Crispy.

The lab, Jasper, who lived outside, was rehomed on another farm.

Quite simply, because Sheila wouldn't have, and the whole scenario was designed around Sheila being made to look responsible.

[Vertigo Swirl]

What revelations did JM make that could be corroborated and/or she did not learn from others?

Who told her about the Meissen clock and the silverware, and why did she even bother to invent a story about Jeremy considering burning down the house?  There was no need was there?  It has the ring of truth because it’s not the kind of detail easily dreamed up.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think it's fair to point out that for many years April and Caroline were "supporters" arguing against all the arguments they now advocate.

It’s heartening to know that supporters can eventually come to their senses.

[APRIL]

I think it's fair to point out that for many years April and Caroline were "supporters" arguing against all the arguments they now advocate.

I've never sought to hide that fact, Holly. Every coin has two sides.