Dr Vanezis Trial Testimony

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't know what Holly's point is, but I'm pleased that everyone can see what the pathologist actually said, rather than what some like to think he said.

Unfortunately some of those pages are virtually impossible to read.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Isn’t all this the same as what’s already in here http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=28.0

Yes, a simple link would have sufficed, meanwhile my question elsewhere continues to be ignored.

[Brietta]

I don't know what Holly's point is, but I'm pleased that everyone can see what the pathologist actually said, rather than what some like to think he said.

Do we aspire to be jurists ... or are we a group of people having discussions on events which happened a lifetime ago for us but a cruelly foreshortened time for the five murdered by Jeremy Bamber.

Sometimes I am of the opinion that the surfeit of information we are fed is more to obfuscate than inform.

[Caroline]

I don't know what Holly's point is, but I'm pleased that everyone can see what the pathologist actually said, rather than what some like to think he said.

Oh I agree!

[Myster]

Isn’t all this the same as what’s already in here http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=28.0

No, Vanezis' testimony at trial has never been posted in the documents section before, but it could now do with moving there permanently.

[The General]

Unfortunately some of those pages are virtually impossible to read.

Just save them to a file as pdf and open in a decent pdf editor - if you're that way inclined.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Just save them to a file as pdf and open in a decent pdf editor - if you're that way inclined.

Will that sort out the “barely there” faded type?  Not that I’m remotely arsed to find out tbh.  I’ve read more than enough gut churning detail about the violent deaths of those poor people than  I ever needed to.

[Holly Goodhead]

I ask myself if those who post here are as lacking in manners in their 'real' lives as they are in their virtual lives?

Vertigo Swirl asked if we know what the pathologist said at trial:

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11316.msg585510#msg585510

The answer is some here know because they have his trial testimony but it isn't in the library here so yesterday evening I spent a good 30 - 40 mins uploading it for the benefit of OTHERS.

Instead of a thank you I get:

- And the point you are making is?

- Isn't all this the same as what's already the same what's in here?

- Unfortunately some of those pages are virtually impossible to read

- Yes, a simple link would have sufficed, meanwhile my question elsewhere continues to be ignored.

- Do we aspire to be jurists ... or are we a group of people having discussions on events which happened a lifetime ago for us but a cruelly foreshortened time for the five murdered by Jeremy Bamber.

Sometimes I am of the opinion that the surfeit of information we are fed is more to obfuscate than inform.

- Will that sort out the “barely there” faded type?  Not that I’m remotely arsed to find out tbh.  I’ve read more than enough gut churning detail about the violent deaths of those poor people than  I ever needed to.

Unbelievable.

[Holly Goodhead]

And the point you are making ... is?

I'm fulfilling a request for info!

[Holly Goodhead]

Isn’t all this the same as what’s already in here http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=28.0

No. 

[Holly Goodhead]

Unfortunately some of those pages are virtually impossible to read.

Oh I'm so sorry shall I spend all day transcribing them for you?

Seriously what do you expect with documents that are some 33 years old?

[Holly Goodhead]

Yes, a simple link would have sufficed, meanwhile my question elsewhere continues to be ignored.

Do you think if a simple link would have sufficed I would waste time uploading the way I have?

[Holly Goodhead]

Do we aspire to be jurists ... or are we a group of people having discussions on events which happened a lifetime ago for us but a cruelly foreshortened time for the five murdered by Jeremy Bamber.

Sometimes I am of the opinion that the surfeit of information we are fed is more to obfuscate than inform.

Never mind surfeit of information you've had a deficit of information to the extent you haven't even read the pathologist's trial testimony but it hasn't stopped you posting your opinions.

If you find this case so unpalatable may I politely recommend that you resign yourself to the MM board.

[Holly Goodhead]

Oh I agree!

You have access to the trial testimony which others don't.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Oh I'm so sorry shall I spend all day transcribing them for you?

Seriously what do you expect with documents that are some 33 years old?

Oh dear, what a sarky reply.  The only thing I expect from you is the courtesy of a reply to posts that I address to you.  I didn’t ask you to post up all these pages did I?