Author Topic: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence  (Read 116709 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #585 on: May 20, 2020, 08:11:06 AM »
How did this term 'guilter' evolve? What an odd label that is, almost as if it is to describe someone with an erroneous counter opinion and there's another option. There is no other option.
It’s a derogatory term to make those who accept Bamber’s guilt sound like some weird American conspiracy nutter cult.
Not a handwriting expert.

Offline The General

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #586 on: May 20, 2020, 08:26:59 AM »
It’s a derogatory term to make those who accept Bamber’s guilt sound like some weird American conspiracy nutter cult.
It's a pretty lame attempt at a quasi-pejorative label that probably points more to a desperate need to create a schism that doesn't exist.
Believing Bamber to be guilty isn't a 'camp', it's an absolute.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #587 on: May 20, 2020, 08:28:57 AM »
It's a pretty lame attempt at a quasi-pejorative label that probably points more to a desperate need to create a schism that doesn't exist.
Believing Bamber to be guilty isn't a 'camp', it's an absolute.
well yeah, but that’s not how the supporters see it.
Not a handwriting expert.

Offline APRIL

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #588 on: May 20, 2020, 08:51:12 AM »
well yeah, but that’s not how the supporters see it.


As a grammar pedant, I disapprove of the term "guilter". I prefer "opposer" or "detractor", the opposites of supporter.

Offline mrswah

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
  • Total likes: 802
  • Thinking outside the box, as usual-------
Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #589 on: May 20, 2020, 10:29:08 AM »

As a grammar pedant, I disapprove of the term "guilter". I prefer "opposer" or "detractor", the opposites of supporter.

Fair enough, I'll use "opposer " in future.  Wasn't sure what to use, to be honest, and I'd seen "guilter" used somewhere else.

But I wouldn't want to offend anyone!

Offline mrswah

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
  • Total likes: 802
  • Thinking outside the box, as usual-------
Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #590 on: May 20, 2020, 10:35:02 AM »
Come on, there are SOME clues!

Of course there are!

I realise he's more likely to be guilty than not, and I go back and forth with my opinions, depending on what I read, and am frustrated that I never come to a conclusion.  Probably haven't read enough of the important stuff-----cant drum up much enthusiasm for blood/ballistics evidence, but I'm very interested in the family "dynamics".

Offline APRIL

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #591 on: May 20, 2020, 10:45:20 AM »
Fair enough, I'll use "opposer " in future.  Wasn't sure what to use, to be honest, and I'd seen "guilter" used somewhere else.

But I wouldn't want to offend anyone!


We can only please some of the posters, SOME of the time, Mrswah ?{)(**

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #592 on: May 20, 2020, 11:25:56 AM »
But why should we see CC's accounts as infallible?

You think the convicted mass murderer Jeremy Bamber’s accounts are infallible

Funny the jury didn’t think so....😌
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #593 on: May 20, 2020, 11:30:48 AM »

As a grammar pedant, I disapprove of the term "guilter". I prefer "opposer" or "detractor", the opposites of supporter.




I stand corrected.  I’m old school.....opposer it is.  Apologies.

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #594 on: May 20, 2020, 11:32:36 AM »
CC's claims often contradict with others.  Eg his claim his mother observed JB naked or semi-naked running out of the bathroom at CC's. He even said recently on prime TV that JB had his hair soaped up in spikes which he did to copy the twins and yet his mother makes no ref to this meeting in her wit stat.


That’s because it didn’t crop up in the interview

What you’re forgetting is, Colin’s mother was in pieces as her beautiful little grandsons had been shot dead — by the man you support — Jeremy Bamber

She wouldn’t have said every solitary thing to the police as they asked her questions, and as the police didn’t know the sick, twisted Jeremy got a sick kick out of copying the twins spiky hair when they were in the bath, and which was in a framed photograph, she obviously never got round to mentioning it
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #595 on: May 22, 2020, 12:13:41 AM »
Maybe you should ask Bamber, Mark Newby or his CT to provide copies of the paperwork related to all exhibits

These questions have still yet to be answered http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,514.msg9287.html#msg9287

Mike, please could you clarify when JB or his legal team were advised that evidence, in particular blood samples, were going to be or had been destroyed, as happened in 1996.

Likewise, in 2002 the CCRC displayed a willingness to use their powers to examine the full circumstances surrounding the destruction of evidence in 1996. JB instructed Turner QC to decline this offer to investigate.  What reason has JB given for his decision?

“It appears JB rejected a golden opportunity to (possibly) have the EP discredited by the CCRC.
The CCRC would have borne the costs as well - not to be sneezed at.
Had EP been proved to be disingenuous on this matter, the Commission may have allowed 'generous discretion' in viewing related grounds for Appeal.

The silence on this leads to other conspiracy theories - that JB wanted blood samples destroyed fearing DNA developments since 1985... etc.

So I think the matter should be addressed
.


These questions have still yet to be answered

In Bamber’s 7th June 2011 letter to Mike T here http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=229.0 on the last page Bamber states,

Those photos you attribute to DS Jones taking them, he didn’t he exhibited them, DC Bird took them, I have copies of the originals - the ones DS Jones exhibited were destroyed not the original images
« Last Edit: May 22, 2020, 12:23:33 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #596 on: May 22, 2020, 05:03:34 PM »
These questions have still yet to be answered

In Bamber’s 7th June 2011 letter to Mike T here http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=229.0 on the last page Bamber states,

Those photos you attribute to DS Jones taking them, he didn’t he exhibited them, DC Bird took them, I have copies of the originals - the ones DS Jones exhibited were destroyed not the original images


Oh, did JB want want the blood from the silencers destroyed?!

Now, why would he want that if he was innocent?😗

And then he complains about evidence that WAS destroyed...🤷‍♀️

He can’t have it both ways
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #597 on: May 23, 2020, 10:19:17 AM »
CC's claims often contradict with others.  Eg his claim his mother observed JB naked or semi-naked running out of the bathroom at CC's. He even said recently on prime TV that JB had his hair soaped up in spikes which he did to copy the twins and yet his mother makes no ref to this meeting in her wit stat.

https://youtu.be/afIXWrexiWk @ 4.20
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #598 on: May 23, 2020, 10:20:58 AM »

Oh, did JB want want the blood from the silencers destroyed?!

Now, why would he want that if he was innocent?😗

And then he complains about evidence that WAS destroyed...🤷‍♀️

He can’t have it both ways

By the time the defence expert visited the lab to examine the silencer there was no evidence of visible blood in the silencer!
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence
« Reply #599 on: May 23, 2020, 10:29:37 AM »
https://youtu.be/afIXWrexiWk @ 4.20


Went through that one yesterday, Holly

Colin’s mum was mourning the loss of her grandsons!

When she made her statement to police she was merely answering questions they asked HER.

It obviously never arose about JB putting his hair in spikes, mimicking the twins’ photo...but he did do it. Colin isn’t  a pathological liar/nut, neither is his mother...but JB is, and he got a warped kick from doing it.
« Last Edit: May 23, 2020, 01:04:37 PM by Ispywithmybigeye »
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.