New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Wonderfulspam]

Murders are usually one off events.

I don't quite see your point.

If you've committed more than one then you can later be described as an ex murderer?

Is that what you're saying?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't quite see your point.

If you've committed more than one then you can later be described as an ex murderer?

Is that what you're saying?

Christian brückner is a convicted rapist.  Agree or disagree?

[Eleanor]

I don't quite see your point.

If you've committed more than one then you can later be described as an ex murderer?

Is that what you're saying?

Child, sexual abuse?  He seems to have done a lot of those.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't quite see your point.

If you've committed more than one then you can later be described as an ex murderer?

Is that what you're saying?

Google “ex-rapist” and “ex-murderer” and supply cites for the first half-dozen examples of individuals described as such in each category.

[Wonderfulspam]

Google “ex-rapist” and “ex-murderer” and supply cites for the first half-dozen examples of individuals described as such in each category.

Exactly, you don't see it anywhere.

Yet there are all the other examples of ex criminals that I have listed.

This is nothing short of social injustice, inequality & blatant discrimination of ex paedophiles, murderers & rapists.

It's a travesty of justice & I fully intend to write a strongly worded letter to my M.P about the issue, when I can be bothered.

[faithlilly]

Exactly, you don't see it anywhere.

Yet there are all the other examples of ex criminals that I have listed.

This is nothing short of social injustice, inequality & blatant discrimination of ex paedophiles, murderers & rapists.

It's a travesty of justice & I fully intend to write a strongly worded letter to my M.P about the issue, when I can be bothered.

I guess there was nothing on the TV then?

[Robittybob1]

I don't quite see your point.

If you've committed more than one then you can later be described as an ex murderer?

Is that what you're saying?

You'd be classed as a serial murderer and hence an ex-serial murderer if you could stop.

[Robittybob1]

I guess there was nothing on the TV then?

Coronation Street is not till later.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Exactly, you don't see it anywhere.

Yet there are all the other examples of ex criminals that I have listed.

This is nothing short of social injustice, inequality & blatant discrimination of ex paedophiles, murderers & rapists.

It's a travesty of justice & I fully intend to write a strongly worded letter to my M.P about the issue, when I can be bothered.

Great.  So until the law is changed to make it illegal to refer to rapists and paedophiles as such, I shall continue to refer to Bruckner as a rapist and a paedophile.  Thanks for the utterly pointless diversion, but then I guess that’s what you’re here for. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

As I was saying before I was so tiresomely interrupted Chistian B is a violent rapist and paedophile who broke into holiday apartments in PdL, who investigators say was in PdL the night Madeleine went missing and whose associates claim he referenced his involvement in the disappearance.  All completely factual. 

[Robittybob1]

As I was saying before I was so tiresomely interrupted Chistian B is a violent rapist and paedophile who broke into holiday apartments in PdL, who investigators say was in PdL the night Madeleine went missing and whose associates claim he referenced his involvement in the disappearance.  All completely factual.

In New Zealand knowing to much history about an accused is grounds for not being selected on a jury examining the case.  The new conviction must be based on the actual evidence of the current case not past convictions.  The accused cannot be referred to as a "violent rapist and paedophile who broke into holiday apartments in PdL".

Evidence would have to be presented to show:
1. he was in PdL the night Madeleine went missing
2. His associates claim he referenced his involvement in the disappearance.

[Vertigo Swirl]

In New Zealand knowing to much history about an accused is grounds for not being selected on a jury examining the case.  The new conviction must be based on the actual evidence of the current case not past convictions.  The accused cannot be referred to as a "violent rapist and paedophile who broke into holiday apartments in PdL".

Evidence would have to be presented to show:
1. he was in PdL the night Madeleine went missing
2. His associates claim he referenced his involvement in the disappearance.

Good job this case won’t be heard in New Zealand or before a jury then.

[Robittybob1]

Good job this case won’t be heard in New Zealand or before a jury then.

I suppose it could be argued that judges are capable of separating past convictions from the current case, more so than untrained jury members.

[Wonderfulspam]

Great.  So until the law is changed to make it illegal to refer to rapists and paedophiles as such, I shall continue to refer to Bruckner as a rapist and a paedophile.  Thanks for the utterly pointless diversion, but then I guess that’s what you’re here for.

Do you happen to know at which point do ex thieves become ex thieves?

Is it immediately after their last theft or do they have to wait a few hours/days/weeks/months after the event before being bestowed with the title Ex?

I'm curious as I believe it may be important in my pursuit of social justice for ex rapist, murderers & paedophiles.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Do you happen to know at which point do ex thieves become ex thieves?

Is it immediately after their last theft or do they have to wait a few hours/days/weeks/months after the event before being bestowed with the title Ex?

I'm curious as I believe it may be important in my pursuit of social justice for ex rapist, murderers & paedophiles.

That’s a question I already asked you.  As you were the one who introduced the concept of ex-murderers then it is down to you to define the exact point at which they transition from one state to another.  But since you asked  I would suggest for your purposes it begins the moment they drop the knife and the deceased keels over.  Hope this helps. ETA apply the same to thieves.  The moment after they have successfully made off with the swag they become an ex-thief.  Makes perfect sense in Spamworld.