New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[kizzy]

If the ECHR rule in favour of the Mcs then the book is ridiculed and is not there to stay

Ye well that is "IF" they do ...as of yet they haven't.

So I would say what I posted ...is more credible than what you have just  posted.

[Eleanor]

Ye well that is "IF" they do ...as of yet they haven't.

So I would say what I posted ...is more credible than what you have just  posted.

I would say not.

[kizzy]

I would say not.

What rule in favour of the mccs

[Mr Gray]

What rule in favour of the mccs

Having looked at a lot of similar cases.. And the fact they say its governed by exising case law.. Portugals very poor record at the ECHR.. And lots more... think its highly likely they will

[Eleanor]

What rule in favour of the mccs

Why ever would I not believe that?

Davel has laid it all out logically for me.

[barrier]

Ye well that is "IF" they do ...as of yet they haven't.

So I would say what I posted ...is more credible than what you have just  posted.

I'm sure you can explain what relevance it has to the new (old) suspect thread.

[kizzy]

Having looked at a lot of similar cases.. And the fact they say its governed by exising case law.. Portugals very poor record at the ECHR.. And lots more... think its highly likely they will

All your posts imo are balanced on probability....the conclusion you yourself  have come to

You don't know what happened anymore than anyone else.

What we do all know though is Maddie an the twins where left ...left alone.

When you do that anything can happen.

Unfortunately IMO the place was trampled by 20 + people destroying any evidence it seems.

[G-Unit]

this is waht GA says in his book...

English and Portuguese police get together to analyse the results of Eddie and Keela's searches.

- What we can deduce at this stage is that only the McCanns are implicated. The dogs did not detect blood or cadaver odour other than with them.

- From now on we have the certainty that there was a body behind the sofa before being taken into the parents' bedroom.

im sure you undersatnd what certainty means.....this is not what harrison says about the meeting...what amaral says in his book is UNTRUE....absolutely no doubt about it...but you think his assumption is reasoanble...imo your credibility has sunk to zero

You should have included what he goes on to say;

"These conclusions do not, for the moment, constitute proof. If the laboratory results are positive, and only in that case, we will have our proof."
TOTL page 78
[/quote]

[Mr Gray]

Perhaps you dont understand what he goes on to say.
He says its a certainty there was a body in 5a..but it can only be confirmef its MM if the Forensic results confirm it

Thr FFS results dont... But he doesnt believe it

[Vertigo Swirl]

Perhaps you dont understand what he goes on to say.
He says its a certainty there was a body in 5a..but it can only be confirmef its MM if the Forensic results confirm it

Thr FFS results dont... But he doesnt believe it

And in order for him to be correct he has to buy into a conspiracy theory.

[G-Unit]

Perhaps you dont understand what he goes on to say.
He says its a certainty there was a body in 5a..but it can only be confirmef its MM if the Forensic results confirm it

Thr FFS results dont... But he doesnt believe it

Was it you who said recently that it's possible to know something's true even if it can't be proved? Perhaps that's how Amaral feels. There are those who 'know' that Madeleine was abducted, but that has never been proved either.

[Mr Gray]

Was it you who said recently that it's possible to know something's true even if it can't be proved? Perhaps that's how Amaral feels. There are those who 'know' that Madeleine was abducted, but that has never been proved either.

I did day that and I meant it.. But only in certain circumstances... I wasnt thinking of assumptions and hunches..
What about if you catch someonr stealing from you.. They break down and cry... Aplogise and promise to pay you back.
But the police get involved... The person then denies everything and the CPS says not enough evidence to prosecute... So you know they are guilty.. But you cant prove it

[Mr Gray]

Was it you who said recently that it's possible to know something's true even if it can't be proved? Perhaps that's how Amaral feels. There are those who 'know' that Madeleine was abducted, but that has never been proved either.

Im sure amaral believes Maddie died in an accident and there is proof... Like most sceptics.. They think of all crazy ideas to try and explain why they are not being prosecuted.. M15... Friends in high places... Elite paedophile rings... Gerry could bring the govt down.. Its all rubbish

[Robittybob1]

Amaral said that at a meeting with UK police it was confirmed that a cavaer had been in 5a and as no one else had died there it confirms the body of MM...which of course is not true.....The files tell us taht at a meeting the UK police told the PJ the alerts confirmed nothing. Stop wriggling and admit what amaral said was not true

Have the McCanns ever denied there had been a cadaver in 5A? 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Have the McCanns ever denied there had been a cadaver in 5A?

Do you think that is something they needed to deny, having already denied having anything to do with Madeleine’s disappearance?