New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Its all built on the telling of his bestest mate over a pint, that's probably where the notion of a photo came from,CB saying I've got a photo  too, Wolters has been searching for four years, you can't find what isn't there to be found.

You didn’t answer the question, what a surprise.

[G-Unit]

snip/

My lips involuntarily curl into a sneer at mention of Amaral and Wolters in the same breath - Amaral isn't fit to lick Wolter's shoe. 

Such strong feelings and certainties about people you don't know! 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Such strong feelings and certainties about people you don't know!

Interesting that you tolerate the personal attack on Brietta above.

[Eleanor]

Such strong feelings and certainties about people you don't know!

And few much stronger than yours.

[G-Unit]

Interesting that you tolerate the personal attack on Brietta above.

You mean the observation that the case seems to have proved emotionally draining? An involuntary feeling of scorn or disgust at the mention of Amaral strikes me as something of an overreaction too. I expect it is draining to be so emotionally involved.

In my opinion Amaral and Wolters share one trait; a conviction that their understanding of this case is the correct one.

[Brietta]

You mean the observation that the case seems to have proved emotionally draining? An involuntary feeling of scorn or disgust at the mention of Amaral strikes me as something of an overreaction too. I expect it is draining to be so emotionally involved.

In my opinion Amaral and Wolters share one trait; a conviction that their understanding of this case is the correct one.

My post certainly caught your attention and Barrier's - what a pity neither of you appear to have the capacity to mount a valid counter argument without stooping to personal insult.

Amaral was responsible for making his name from a libellous book about a horrendously botched non-investigation into the disappearance of a child.

Not content with that he has done his best to interfere with the current investigation.

• there was the podcast in 2020 followed by interviews indicating who the prime suspect was who could only be more perfect if he were dead
• he lied spectacularly about cartoons painted on the campervan which was of interest to the investigation
• he lied about the appearance of the prime suspect in a case which had been classed as a murder enquiry

I really don't think one could encounter a more toe curling individual than that one unless Brueckner is taken out of the equation.

[Eleanor]

You mean the observation that the case seems to have proved emotionally draining? An involuntary feeling of scorn or disgust at the mention of Amaral strikes me as something of an overreaction too. I expect it is draining to be so emotionally involved.

In my opinion Amaral and Wolters share one trait; a conviction that their understanding of this case is the correct one.

Amaral had NO understanding, obviously.  It remains to be seen if Wolters is correct about about a convicted Rapist and Paedophile.

[John]

Posters are reminded to maintain some decorum when responding to comments. TY

[Eleanor]

My post certainly caught your attention and Barrier's - what a pity neither of you appear to have the capacity to mount a valid counter argument without stooping to personal insult.

Amaral was responsible for making his name from a libellous book about a horrendously botched non-investigation into the disappearance of a child.

Not content with that he has done his best to interfere with the current investigation.

• there was the podcast in 2020 followed by interviews indicating who the prime suspect was who could only be more perfect if he were dead
• he lied spectacularly about cartoons painted on the campervan which was of interest to the investigation
• he lied about the appearance of the prime suspect in a case which had been classed as a murder enquiry

I really don't think one could encounter a more toe curling individual than that one unless Brueckner is taken out of the equation.

Do you know, the only thing that bothers me about Deleting Insults is that most people don't get to see them, if I get there quick enough.  For the good of The Forum, obviously.

Perhaps I should make more use of The Warning Points.  I might well give that some thought.

[Mr Gray]

You mean the observation that the case seems to have proved emotionally draining? An involuntary feeling of scorn or disgust at the mention of Amaral strikes me as something of an overreaction too. I expect it is draining to be so emotionally involved.

In my opinion Amaral and Wolters share one trait; a conviction that their understanding of this case is the correct one.

But we know as a fact Amaral's understanding was poor.. And we know what hr baded his theory on.. Fallacy after fallacy... We cant simply assume Wolters is incompetent..

[Eleanor]

But we know as a fact Amaral's understanding was poor.. And we know what hr baded his theory on.. Fallacy after fallacy... We cant simply assume Wolters is incompetent..

Amaral had two very ordinary Doctors.  Wolters has a Paedophile and Rapist. 

Amaral was up to his eyeballs in serious debt, some of which was decidedly suspicious.  While Wolters has nothing against him.

[misty]

Amaral had two very ordinary Doctors.  Wolters has a Paedophile and Rapist. 

Amaral was up to his eyeballs in serious debt, some of which was decidedly suspicious.  While Wolters has nothing against him.

It does make you question why he (Amaral) chose to write a book about one of his failures, rather than all the investigations which had been successfully concluded, in order to "restore his reputation". We should perhaps also bear in mind that Amaral was not the only PJ/ex-PJ officer being indicted on 4/5/07 in the Cipriano torture case and Madeleine's disappearance was certainly a convenient deflection for them.

[G-Unit]

But we know as a fact Amaral's understanding was poor.. And we know what hr baded his theory on.. Fallacy after fallacy... We cant simply assume Wolters is incompetent..

Amaral based his theory upon the evidence in the PJ Files. We don't know what Wolters has based his theory on but he has made it plain what he thinks. Some may think a prosecutor sharing his beliefs with the world's media is competent. I don't agree with that.

[misty]

https://www.theolivepress.es/spain-news/2021/06/07/exclusive-over-1000-tips-on-maddie-case-which-could-be-solved-by-end-of-the-year/

I can't copy & paste the content but the article is worth a read. Wolters has stated that there should be a conclusion to the Behan rape case within a few months.
The Irish media have reported that BKA are determined to charge him re. this crime. https://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/crime/irish-woman-suspected-been-raped-24285940

[Vertigo Swirl]

You mean the observation that the case seems to have proved emotionally draining? An involuntary feeling of scorn or disgust at the mention of Amaral strikes me as something of an overreaction too. I expect it is draining to be so emotionally involved.

In my opinion Amaral and Wolters share one trait; a conviction that their understanding of this case is the correct one.

No, I mean the accusation that Brietta was "damaged", since removed by John, and points awarded - you must have "missed" it.