New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Mr Gray]

Well, I do know he has neither dna, nor forensics, nor any other evidence credible enough to successfully prosecute Brueckner with, or anyone else for that matter.

He has evidence which convinces him... All of the evidence he has may not be admissible... Evidence collected in the Australian and Paraguan investigations. Thidvis being decided in the German courts at the moment as regards another case
.

[Wonderfulspam]

He has evidence which convinces him... All of the evidence he has may not be admissible... Evidence collected in the Australian and Paraguan investigations. Thidvis being decided in the German courts at the moment as regards another case
.

But not this case. No charges in sight for this case, despite two years of hype.

Yes, maybe it's just a technical legal issue & not because his evidence is phoney & has been grossly exaggerated.

[Vertigo Swirl]

As does everyone here.

It is not ignorant to say that three police forces are investigating the disappearance as a stranger abduction and that CB was made arguido based on strong indications of the practice of a crime, though many here dispute this.  It is ignorant to say that there is no evidence to support stranger abduction, which is a position many here insist is the truth despite the obvious fact that it is not, otherwise it would not be being investigated by three police forces. 

[Wonderfulspam]

It is not ignorant to say that three police forces are investigating the disappearance as a stranger abduction and that CB was made arguido based on strong indications of the practice of a crime, though many here dispute this.  It is ignorant to say that there is no evidence to support stranger abduction, which is a position many here insist is the truth despite the obvious fact that it is not, otherwise it would not be being investigated by three police forces.

There is, it's just it's a secondhand alleged confession & a phone call that doesn't prove anything either.

Appeal to authority as much as you like, but the authority you appeal to have rammed into a brick wall.

[Eleanor]

It is not ignorant to say that three police forces are investigating the disappearance as a stranger abduction and that CB was made arguido based on strong indications of the practice of a crime, though many here dispute this.  It is ignorant to say that there is no evidence to support stranger abduction, which is a position many here insist is the truth despite the obvious fact that it is not, otherwise it would not be being investigated by three police forces.

Ah well you see, they would have to admit that they were wrong.  And we all know that they will never do that because that would involve admitting that they are downright nasty.

[G-Unit]

It is not ignorant to say that three police forces are investigating the disappearance as a stranger abduction and that CB was made arguido based on strong indications of the practice of a crime, though many here dispute this.  It is ignorant to say that there is no evidence to support stranger abduction, which is a position many here insist is the truth despite the obvious fact that it is not, otherwise it would not be being investigated by three police forces.

I never used 'ignorant' in that way. I was replying to;

"as there is no possible way that the troll can know what evidence the Germans have he writes from a position of almost complete ignorance."

Which applies to everyone here, not just 'trolls'.

[Wonderfulspam]

I never used 'ignorant' in that way. I was replying to;

"as there is no possible way that the troll can know what evidence the Germans have he writes from a position of almost complete ignorance."

Which applies to everyone here, not just 'trolls'.

But it's not total ignorance, we know they don't have sufficient credible evidence to prosecute Brueckner.
We know that.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I never used 'ignorant' in that way. I was replying to;

"as there is no possible way that the troll can know what evidence the Germans have he writes from a position of almost complete ignorance."

Which applies to everyone here, not just 'trolls'.

I think you are missing the point.  Claiming that there is no evidence of stranger abduction and/or that the German authorities have no evidence against Bruckner is a claim made from a position of almost complete ignorance.  The troll (amongst others, yourself included) is making that claim, I am not.

[Mr Gray]

There is, it's just it's a secondhand alleged confession & a phone call that doesn't prove anything either.

Appeal to authority as much as you like, but the authority you appeal to have rammed into a brick wall.

If Wolters is a complete liar.. Idiot... And is backed by the BKA you are right... But I don't see that

[Mr Gray]

But not this case. No charges in sight for this case, despite two years of hype.

Yes, maybe it's just a technical legal issue & not because his evidence is phoney & has been grossly exaggerated.

There could well be evidence relating to this case collected overseas... You want to believe his evidence is phoney.. I don't see that

[Vertigo Swirl]

It would seem that some people point blank refuse to accept that the German authorities have kept back evidence from the public domain.  It seems that they believe the Germans have divulged every scrap of evidence that they have.  It;s a very ignorant belief IMO.

[Mr Gray]

I think you are missing the point.  Claiming that there is no evidence of stranger abduction and/or that the German authorities have no evidence against Bruckner is a claim made from a position of almost complete ignorance.  The troll (amongst others, yourself included) is making that claim, I am not.

A claim made from a position of total ignorance in reality

[Wonderfulspam]

It would seem that some people point blank refuse to accept that the German authorities have kept back evidence from the public domain.  It seems that they believe the Germans have divulged every scrap of evidence that they have.  It;s a very ignorant belief IMO.

Whatever they do or might have doesn't carry sufficient weight to pursue a prosecution against either Brueckner or anyone else.

Whatever they might have leaves space for reasonable doubt, whilst simultaneously being 100% convincing, apparently.

[Eleanor]

I know without doubt that The McCanns are not responsible for the disappearance of their daughter.  Plain Logic tells me that.

Therefor someone else must be responsible and there have been a few suggestions in the past, albeit without much success.

Brueckner?  Who knows?  But he is the most likely so far with his track record, although more likely to have been for financial gain in my opinion.

I am still battling with German Law after years of Portuguese Law, which are both vastly different from British Law.

But Germany has got him and they won't be letting him go in a hurry, to wander around Europe unchecked.  He has been locked up for quite some time and is now probably more dangerous.  Psychopaths always think that they are more clever.  So lock up your Grannies and your Children just in case.

[Wonderfulspam]

I know without doubt that The McCanns are not responsible for the disappearance of their daughter. Plain Logic tells me that.[/b]

Therefor someone else must be responsible and there have been a few suggestions in the past, albeit without much success.

Brueckner?  Who knows?  But he is the most likely so far with his track record, although more likely to have been for financial gain in my opinion.

I am still battling with German Law after years of Portuguese Law, which are both vastly different from British Law.

But Germany has got him and they won't be letting him go in a hurry, to wander around Europe unchecked.  He has been locked up for quite some time and is now probably more dangerous.  Psychopaths always think that they are more clever.  So lock up your Grannies and your Children just in case.

Wolters is in possession of all the evidence & is 100% convinced by it that Brueckner murdered Maddie &, if only you could see the evidence you'd be equally convinced by it.

Why do you doubt him?  That's just crazy thinking, you must think the BKA are all idiots.