New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Brietta]

I don't know the answers to your interminable questions. All I know is that placing one's faith in the excellence of SY is a gamble these days. So we're left relying on the Germans to charge CB and they seem no nearer to connecting him to Madeleine McCann's disappearance than they were when they started their investigations.

What is to be hoped for is that Brueckner will be subject to due process for the serious crimes of which he is currently indicted, irrespective of how many procedural spanners his legal team throws into the works.

Till that process has been concluded we internet sleuths will just have to bide our time until investigators decide what further steps are applicable.

In the intervening time it is worth pondering on the thought that the BKA have intimate knowledge of the evidence they hold regarding Brueckner to which neither he, his legal team, the media or internet posters have access.

Let's just wait and see what that is shall we.  Inclusive of the fact that no-one has so far had cause to 'fall off their chair' another thing of which we we can be certain, is that it won't consist of his alleged alibi evidence.  As far as the rest of it goes, I would not be as confident as you are when you speculate they are no further forward than "they were when they started their investigations." that you are anywhere near the truth.

[Wonderfulspam]

What is to be hoped for is that Brueckner will be subject to due process for the serious crimes of which he is currently indicted, irrespective of how many procedural spanners his legal team throws into the works.

Till that process has been concluded we internet sleuths will just have to bide our time until investigators decide what further steps are applicable.

In the intervening time it is worth pondering on the thought that the BKA have intimate knowledge of the evidence they hold regarding Brueckner to which neither he, his legal team, the media or internet posters have access.

Let's just wait and see what that is shall we. Inclusive of the fact that no-one has so far had cause to 'fall off their chair' another thing of which we we can be certain, is that it won't consist of his alleged alibi evidence.  As far as the rest of it goes, I would not be as confident as you are when you speculate they are no further forward than "they were when they started their investigations." that you are anywhere near the truth.

We already know there's nothing physical against CB. No DNA or forensics. That leaves circumstantial.
Any number of the possibilities I've previously suggested on 'The evidence Against CB' thread.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?PHPSESSID=ik34g896lj1vohcaoe7v13mgi0&topic=12474.0

So it's incorrect to say we have no idea what the police have. We have plenty of indication they have b....r all of any real significance, hence the reason Brueckner will never be charged with anything relating to Madeleine's disappearance, and no, he doesn't actually need an alibi for anything, because the three expert investigative forces are unable to prove TMWTIACABAS in the first place.

[G-Unit]

I’m not placing my faith in anything or relying on anyone for anything much, but if I had to put money on either the Germans and/or the Met to solve this case or a bunch of internet detectives without any professional expertise or without full access to the facts (and some of them might be rapists and paedos too for all we know) then my money would be on the former.  Where would you like to place your faith and reliance?

I don't see any need to place my faith in or reliance on anyone. I never have.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't see any need to place my faith in or reliance on anyone. I never have.

So when someone dear to you goes missing in mysterious circumstances you won't bother to phone those rapey old policemen I guess.  Good luck!

[Eleanor]

I don't see any need to place my faith in or reliance on anyone. I never have.

Hence Miscarriages of Justice.

[Brietta]

We already know there's nothing physical against CB. No DNA or forensics. That leaves circumstantial.
Any number of the possibilities I've previously suggested on 'The evidence Against CB' thread.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?PHPSESSID=ik34g896lj1vohcaoe7v13mgi0&topic=12474.0

So it's incorrect to say we have no idea what the police have. We have plenty of indication they have b....r all of any real significance, hence the reason Brueckner will never be charged with anything relating to Madeleine's disappearance, and no, he doesn't actually need an alibi for anything, because the three expert investigative forces are unable to prove TMWTIACABAS in the first place.

You know nothing.

In particular you know nothing about the evidence held by the BKA featuring Brueckner and what it does or doesn't say about Brueckner's involvement in Madeleine McCann's disappearance.

All that is for the the due process of the law to decide.  I am afraid self confessed internet Wind Up Merchants have absolutely no place in that process.

You know this.  And I fear that knowledge is sufficient to upset your equilibrium somewhat ~ the proof of which is always a pleasure to behold as reflected in the ordure you insist on posting.

[G-Unit]

So when someone dear to you goes missing in mysterious circumstances you won't bother to phone those rapey old policemen I guess.  Good luck!

Does that involve having faith in or relying on them?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Does that involve having faith in or relying on them?

Of course it does.  Why would you call on them if you had no faith in their ability to find your loved one?Why would you seek assistance  from them if you wouldn’t rely on them to perform the duties they are employed to carry out? We all rely on numerous professionals in all walks of life - doctors, nurses, teachers, fire fighters, paramedics, delivery drivers, postmen  - all of these professions have evil members amongst their ranks, it doesn’t mean they are all entirely unreliable. 

[G-Unit]

Of course it does.  Why would you call on them if you had no faith in their ability to find your loved one?Why would you seek assistance  from them if you wouldn’t rely on them to perform the duties they are employed to carry out? We all rely on numerous professionals in all walks of life - doctors, nurses, teachers, fire fighters, paramedics, delivery drivers, postmen  - all of these professions have evil members amongst their ranks, it doesn’t mean they are all entirely unreliable.

I don't see the need to use the word 'rely', I prefer 'use'.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't see the need to use the word 'rely', I prefer 'use'.

Oh, right, semantics again. So you use a teacher to educate your kids but you don’t rely on them to do so.  You use a surgeon for your open heart surgery but you don’t rely on them to know what they are doing to treat you effectively.  You use a firefighter when your house goes up in flames but you have no faith in their ability to do so effectively and therefore don’t rely on them to do a good job.  Yeah, whatever.

[G-Unit]

Oh, right, semantics again. So you use a teacher to educate your kids but you don’t rely on them to do so.  You use a surgeon for your open heart surgery but you don’t rely on them to know what they are doing to treat you effectively.  You use a firefighter when your house goes up in flames but you have no faith in their ability to do so effectively and therefore don’t rely on them to do a good job.  Yeah, whatever.

Try not using emotive language including words such as faith and rely.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Try not using emotive language including words such as faith and rely.

What a cheek!  It was YOU who introduced those words to the discussion in the first place.  And hey, try not telling me what words I may and may not use.  Faith and Rely are perfectly acceptable words to use and if I want to use them I shall.

For example:  I can always rely on you to deflect and dissemble 

[Wonderfulspam]

You know nothing.

In particular you know nothing about the evidence held by the BKA featuring Brueckner and what it does or doesn't say about Brueckner's involvement in Madeleine McCann's disappearance.

All that is for the the due process of the law to decide.  I am afraid self confessed internet Wind Up Merchants have absolutely no place in that process.

You know this.  And I fear that knowledge is sufficient to upset your equilibrium somewhat ~ the proof of which is always a pleasure to behold as reflected in the ordure you insist on posting.

No, you're quite wrong. I know, by Wolters admission, that they have no DNA or forensics.
The 'evidence' against CB is limited to a number of possibilities, which I have previously listed on the evidence against CB thread. The best example of possible evidence suggested by your compatriots was CB's confession to Busching.
Due process has already happened, Wolters has nothing of genuine substance against CB, hence the reason he still hasn't been charged, & won't be getting charged with anything related to Maddie, any time in the forseeable future. That's how concrete the concrete evidence against him is.

[Eleanor]

Just lock up Brueckner on what they can prove, for the time being.  They have witnesses and a Police Arrest in the Child Sexual Abuse Cases.  That should get him ten more years off the streets of Europe.

Meanwhile, sadly Madeleine will have to wait.  But the disappearance of one small girl has resulted in the exposure of a corrupt Police Force in Portugal.

[jassi]

Just lock up Brueckner on what they can prove, for the time being.  They have witnesses and a Police Arrest in the Child Sexual Abuse Cases.  That should get him ten more years off the streets of Europe.

Meanwhile, sadly Madeleine will have to wait.  But the disappearance of one small girl has resulted in the exposure of a corrupt Police Force in Portugal.

Until it comes to trial, nothing is proved. We know the charges, but not how strong the evidence is, or what defence might be put forward.