New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Robittybob1]

If Brueckner's Lawyer is relying on PJ Evidence of the time then he is on a very sticky wicket.  In My Opinion.

Why do you think this?

[Mr Gray]

Why do you think this?

The initial PJ investigation didnt understand the evidence...they thought the dogs and dna proved Maddie died in the apartment

[Mr Gray]

That is libel if I ever I've seen one.  FF in your description = possibly "the bottom of the barrel".   Defamation case coming up IMO.

This is what John had to say about HCW...


I managed to catch Martin Brunt's interview with the German prosecutor on Friday and I must say the guy comes across as a prize pillock.

In my opinion he is a glory hunter, a chancer, a bluffer, who is seeking to exploit Madeleine for his own benefit.

[Robittybob1]

have you read what has been said about HCW by several posters...do you understand the defamation law

You ought to.

[Mr Gray]

You ought to.

I do Rob..

Under the Act, a statement is held not to be defamatory "unless its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the claimant".

Would you say my statement has caused serious harm to FFs reputation

[Robittybob1]

I think most understand the word

It seems to be you who has trouble understanding the concept of alibi.  CB isn't presenting a strong alibi that immediately rules him out.   He is like the other several thousand inhabitants of PdL, within walking distance of the apartment.

[Mr Gray]

It seems to be you who has trouble understanding the concept of alibi.  CB isn't presenting a strong alibi that immediately rules him out.   He is like the other several thousand inhabitants of PdL, within walking distance of the apartment.

I understand the word alibi...and libel...CB doesnt seem to have one at the moment

[Robittybob1]

The initial PJ investigation didnt understand the evidence...they thought the dogs and dna proved Maddie died in the apartment

And how does that support Eleanor's statement "If Brueckner's Lawyer is relying on PJ Evidence of the time then he is on a very sticky wicket."

[Robittybob1]

This is what John had to say about HCW...


I managed to catch Martin Brunt's interview with the German prosecutor on Friday and I must say the guy comes across as a prize pillock.

In my opinion he is a glory hunter, a chancer, a bluffer, who is seeking to exploit Madeleine for his own benefit.

In your case you are defaming FF not HCW.  FF is a lawyer too remember.

[Mr Gray]

And how does that support Eleanor's statement "If Brueckner's Lawyer is relying on PJ Evidence of the time then he is on a very sticky wicket."

Ithink its self explanatory

[Robittybob1]

I do Rob..

Under the Act, a statement is held not to be defamatory "unless its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the claimant".

Would you say my statement has caused serious harm to FFs reputation

To say he is "possibly the scraping from the bottom of the barrel", is very damaging to his reputation IMO.

Ithink its self explanatory

With the exception of this time.  The explanation needs to be yours.

[Mr Gray]

In your case you are defaming FF not HCW.  FF is a lawyer too remember.

Would you say my statement has caused serious harm to FFs reputation..

so you only see my statement as libellous but not Johns....I dont see either as libellous based on the above

[Mr Gray]

To say he is "possibly the scraping from the bottom of the barrel", is very damaging to his reputation IMO.
With the exception of this time.  The explanation needs to be yours.

I dont see it would cause serious damage....if you think it would then you should see Johns posts as libellous.

What good would advice be from those who didnt understand the evidence...no use

[Robittybob1]

Would you say my statement has caused serious harm to FFs reputation..

so you only see my statement as libellous but not Johns....I dont see either as libellous based on the above

It is not my role to moderate John.   I'm looking after your butt not his.

[Mr Gray]

It is not my role to moderate John.   I'm looking after your butt not his.

You are not looking after my butt...dont be disgusting

continue the conversation on your own....I want no further part