New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Eleanor]

Actually I think what's happening is we're preparing the way for a new theory - the hired murderer theory.  That way both parents and CB can be involved!  Win-win.

I think you might be right.  It's been hinted of often enough of late.

Depraved Thinking, if you want my opinion.

[barrier]

Just doing a bit of reading, was on holiday at the time this was updated, but has CB's lawyer got the paper work regarding Madeleine's case ? or are they confusing it with other cases .

He said the investigations are "in principle, complete, and over the next few days his lawyer will be able to examine the files. I don't know what the result will be. We will have to hear what his lawyer says. We need to wait and see the extent of the charges we will bring."

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1606566/madeleine-mcann-christian-b-suspect-evidence-latest

[G-Unit]

It seems that after all these years of denying an abduction took place you can't accept that it did.
Your post is opinion as fact

All the abduction claims are opinion and always have been.

[Vertigo Swirl]

All the abduction claims are opinion and always have been.

informed, expert opinion, with evidence now it would seem.

[Wonderfulspam]

informed, expert opinion, with evidence now it would seem.

Just can't prove anything in a court of law. No biggie.

[Brietta]

If CB is convicted of murder but not abduction then it can't be assumed that he was an abductor. How Madeleine left 5A would remain a mystery for ever. Maybe MWT's theory was correct; she wandered off.

If the evidence results in Brueckner's conviction for Madeleine's murder it negates absolutely the slurs Amaral and his band of sceptic followers have been promoting for over fifteen years.

The mere  fact that there is evidence which makes Brueckner the prime suspect already does that.  But there are too many egos invested in the beliefs promulgated by the nasty theories Amaral dreamt up, aided and abetted by sceptic ignorance for common sense to prevail.

Madeleine's ultimate fate might be determined in a German court; and that will not be a forever mystery, only why you should record that opinion for posterity remains in any which way mysterious.

Even the most rabid of sceptics require to justify the ill begotten path they have travelled by choice.   Even the most hardened of sceptics appear to have realised the need to excuse their unquestioning active support for the dregs of humanity as exemplified by the new folk hero whose criminal behaviour and convictions brought him to police attention in the first instance.

[Mr Gray]

All the abduction claims are opinion and always have been.

Opinion based on evidence...and the opinion of three police forces

[Wonderfulspam]

If the evidence results in Brueckner's conviction for Madeleine's murder it negates absolutely the slurs Amaral and his band of sceptic followers have been promoting for over fifteen years.

The mere  fact that there is evidence which makes Brueckner the prime suspect already does that.  But there are too many egos invested in the beliefs promulgated by the nasty theories Amaral dreamt up, aided and abetted by sceptic ignorance for common sense to prevail.

Madeleine's ultimate fate might be determined in a German court; and that will not be a forever mystery, only why you should record that opinion for posterity remains in any which way mysterious.

Even the most rabid of sceptics require to justify the ill begotten path they have travelled by choice.   Even the most hardened of sceptics appear to have realised the need to excuse their unquestioning active support for the dregs of humanity as exemplified by the new folk hero whose criminal behaviour and convictions brought him to police attention in the first instance.

Might be?

You're having some doubt about that now are you?

Any particular reason?

[Brietta]

Actually I think what's happening is we're preparing the way for a new theory - the hired murderer theory.  That way both parents and CB can be involved!  Win-win.

I agree the necessity to find something - anything - to keep the sceptic wagon on the road and it won't much matter what new theory they adopt I am sure something will be dreamt up.

They did their level best to add Murat into that mix.  So I see no barrier to them adopting Brueckner should he be convicted and adding him to the abounding conspiracy theories.

I can't tell you how sad that opinion makes me.  I find the concept that there should be such unbridled hatred directed at a family totally incomprehensible.  Particularly when one takes account of what a conviction for Brueckner will mean for them.

[Wonderfulspam]

I agree the necessity to find something - anything - to keep the sceptic wagon on the road and it won't much matter what new theory they adopt I am sure something will be dreamt up.

They did their level best to add Murat into that mix.  So I see no barrier to them adopting Brueckner should he be convicted and adding him to the abounding conspiracy theories.

I can't tell you how sad that opinion makes me.  I find the concept that there should be such unbridled hatred directed at a family totally incomprehensible.  Particularly when one takes account of what a conviction for Brueckner will mean for them.

Any idea when that's happening?

A conviction for Brueckner I mean.

You know, bearing in mind the concrete evidence of 3 investigative forces, probably happening some time soon isn't it.

But not today though, maybe tomorrow, let's check in again tomorrow & see how Wolters is getting on then.

[Brietta]

I think you might be right.  It's been hinted of often enough of late.

Depraved Thinking, if you want my opinion.

I agree.  And I am basing my opinion on what I can see being posted here and elsewhere.

[G-Unit]

Opinion based on evidence...and the opinion of three police forces

Evidence which doesn't lead to a conviction is insufficient evidence and can thereafter be dismissed as lies/misinterpretations/wishful thinking in my experience. I've seen it in action for years.

[Brietta]

Just doing a bit of reading, was on holiday at the time this was updated, but has CB's lawyer got the paper work regarding Madeleine's case ? or are they confusing it with other cases .

He said the investigations are "in principle, complete, and over the next few days his lawyer will be able to examine the files. I don't know what the result will be. We will have to hear what his lawyer says. We need to wait and see the extent of the charges we will bring."

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1606566/madeleine-mcann-christian-b-suspect-evidence-latest

In my opinion Brueckner's lawyers have the information as part of the process pertaining to the five sexual crimes the prosecutors hope to bring to trial.

In my opinion the files on Madeleine's case will not be handed over until those cases have been tried.

I thought EVERYONE knew that.  The media has been full of it.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Evidence which doesn't lead to a conviction is insufficient evidence and can thereafter be dismissed as lies/misinterpretations/wishful thinking in my experience. I've seen it in action for years.

Failure by the police to secure a conviction despite any  compelling evidence they may have against CB can be a reason for utmost rejoicing by those who will thereafter enjoy carte blanche to continue their campaign of lies/misinterpretation and wishful thinking pushing the "parents dunnit" theory - I bet you can't wait for that day. 

[Wonderfulspam]

Failure by the police to secure a conviction despite any  compelling evidence they may have against CB can be a reason for utmost rejoicing by those who will thereafter enjoy carte blanche to continue their campaign of lies/misinterpretation and wishful thinking pushing the "parents dunnit" theory - I bet you can't wait for that day.

We don't even need to wait for that day, that day is now, they're failing to secure a conviction now, as we speak, & have been for the last two years, & will be for the foreseeable future.

But maybe after that, aye, lets see what happens after that.