New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Mr Gray]

It's supporters who got carried away, not sceptics imo.

It appears to be a major breakthrough.....afaiac.......the case is solved.....

I dont believe wolters would make such claims and not have the evidence....and no contradiction from his own police force ...SY...or the PJ

If Amaral came out now ad said he had evidence that would100% convince othere of the mccanns guilt I would find that very significant

[Wonderfulspam]

It appears to be a major breakthrough.....afaiac.......the case is solved.....

I dont believe wolters would make such claims and not have the evidence....and no contradiction from his own police force ...SY...or the PJ

If Amaral came out now ad said he had evidence that would100% convince othere of the mccanns guilt I would find that very significant

Wolters says.....so it must be true.
That's deep man.

[G-Unit]

It appears to be a major breakthrough.....afaiac.......the case is solved.....

I dont believe wolters would make such claims and not have the evidence....and no contradiction from his own police force ...SY...or the PJ

If Amaral came out now ad said he had evidence that would100% convince othere of the mccanns guilt I would find that very significant

Well atm it seems he hasn't managed to convince even one judge to allow him to charge his suspect.

[jassi]

Well atm it seems he hasn't managed to convince even one judge to allow him to charge his suspect.

Has he even tried ?

[Wonderfulspam]

Has he even tried ?

No, he needs to make sure the 100% convincing evidence is watertight first.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Has he even tried ?

I was going to make exactly that point, what evidence is there that a judge has rejected HCW case against Bruckner on the basis of the evidence he has collected thus far?

[Mr Gray]

Well atm it seems he hasn't managed to convince even one judge to allow him to charge his suspect.

tiresome.....he doesnt want too at the moment

[Wonderfulspam]

tiresome.....he doesnt want too at the moment

Or maybe he just never had concrete evidence in the first place.

Not looking much like he has really is it.

[jassi]

Or maybe he just never had concrete evidence in the first place.

Not looking much like he has really is it.

It must be very sub-standard concrete if its going to be a couple of years or more  before its presentable.

[G-Unit]

Has he even tried ?

Why not if he has concrete evidence that MM is dead and CB did it? Evidence that will convince us all, apparently. Why wait?

[Eleanor]

Brueckner won't be released any time soon.

[jassi]

Not before 2023, which is when he's eligible  to apply for parole

[G-Unit]

Brueckner won't be released any time soon.

Or convicted of a crime against Madeleine McCann either by the looks of it.

[Mr Gray]

Why not if he has concrete evidence that MM is dead and CB did it? Evidence that will convince us all, apparently. Why wait?

Have you been asleep for the past two years

[Vertigo Swirl]

Why not if he has concrete evidence that MM is dead and CB did it? Evidence that will convince us all, apparently. Why wait?

Even concrete evidence can still be disputed in a court of law and further evidence may be needed to ensure a concrete conviction, it’s really not rocket science.  Look at the case of the murder on the submarine for example.  Tons of concrete evidence pointed to what had occurred but to ensure a cast iron conviction the missing pieces were needed which took a huge amount of time and effort to secure. Now grow up the lot of you.