New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Brietta]

Yup.  The Hat.  That's the one.  Meanwhile, Brueckner went entirely unnoticed.  I really can't get my head round that.

It is evident that Amaral knew all about Brueckner being on police radar right from the word go.  So in effect Brueckner was never 'new' in Madeleine's disappearance.  He was there right from the beginning.  And Amaral knew all about him.

The Portuguese prosecutors said,
The non involvement of the arguidos parents of Madeleine in any penally relevant action seems to result from the objective circumstances of them

• not being inside the apartment when she disappeared
• from the normal behaviour that they adopted until said disappearance
• and afterwards
• as can be amply concluded from the witness statements
• from the telephone communications analysis
• and also from the forensics' conclusions
• namely the Reports from the FSS
• and from the National Institute for Legal Medicine
• To this can be added that, in reality, none of the indications that led to their constitution as arguidos was later confirmed or consolidated.
• If not, let us see:
  the information concerning a previous alert of the media before the polices was not confirmed
• the traces that were marked by the dogs were not ratified in laboratory
• and the initial indications from the above transcribed email, better clarified at a later date, ended up being revealed as innocuous.

Amaral knew all of that.
Yet he has continued his vendetta against Kate and Gerry McCann ever since 2007 and even now as he defends Brueckner in the media as he interferes with the German investigation of Madeleine's case.

Amaral also knew that Brueckner had been on police radar during his watch.  He also knew that no-one on his team had interviewed him.  We know this because he told us so while at the same time continuing to publicise his slurs against Gerry McCann.

All those years when he knew about Brueckner and never once thought to tip the wink about him.  Very strange.

[The General]

It is evident that Amaral knew all about Brueckner being on police radar right from the word go.  So in effect Brueckner was never 'new' in Madeleine's disappearance.  He was there right from the beginning.  And Amaral knew all about him.

The Portuguese prosecutors said,
The non involvement of the arguidos parents of Madeleine in any penally relevant action seems to result from the objective circumstances of them

• not being inside the apartment when she disappeared
• from the normal behaviour that they adopted until said disappearance
• and afterwards
• as can be amply concluded from the witness statements
• from the telephone communications analysis
• and also from the forensics' conclusions
• namely the Reports from the FSS
• and from the National Institute for Legal Medicine
• To this can be added that, in reality, none of the indications that led to their constitution as arguidos was later confirmed or consolidated.
• If not, let us see:
  the information concerning a previous alert of the media before the polices was not confirmed
• the traces that were marked by the dogs were not ratified in laboratory
• and the initial indications from the above transcribed email, better clarified at a later date, ended up being revealed as innocuous.

Amaral knew all of that.
Yet he has continued his vendetta against Kate and Gerry McCann ever since 2007 and even now as he defends Brueckner in the media as he interferes with the German investigation of Madeleine's case.

Amaral also knew that Brueckner had been on police radar during his watch.  He also knew that no-one on his team had interviewed him.  We know this because he told us so while at the same time continuing to publicise his slurs against Gerry McCann.

All those years when he knew about Brueckner and never once thought to tip the wink about him.  Very strange.

Admit you've been owned again and move on. It's for the best.

[Eleanor]

Admit you've been owned again and move on. It's for the best.

Another very silly comment.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Another very silly comment.

The troll's desperate to provoke, just ignore.

[Eleanor]

The troll's desperate to provoke, just ignore.

One is bad enough, but two of them?

[Vertigo Swirl]

One is bad enough, but two of them?

troll tag team

[G-Unit]

troll tag team

The only tag team I can see at the moment are those deciding that others are trolls. It would help if they explained how they reached their conclusions. (although it's totally off-topic)

[Vertigo Swirl]

The only tag team I can see at the moment are those deciding that others are trolls. It would help if they explained how they reached their conclusions. (although it's totally off-topic)

Are you setting me a trap?  Start a thread on trolls if you want to discuss further.  Meanwhile, to answer your question -  the posts obviously speak for themselves.   Talk of "owning" and "is everyone off searching for Maddie" are clearly designed to provoke (especially as they come out of the blue, after days of no posts on here at all).  As a moderator you should know this, but perhaps you missed that class at Mod School so here you go, just in case you were unsure:

 troll noun [C] (COMPUTING)
 
someone who leaves an intentionally annoying or offensive message on the internet, in order to upset someone or to get attention or cause trouble

[Eleanor]

Are you setting me a trap?  Start a thread on trolls if you want to discuss further.  Meanwhile, to answer your question -  the posts obviously speak for themselves.   Talk of "owning" and "is everyone off searching for Maddie" are clearly designed to provoke (especially as they come out of the blue, after days of no posts on here at all).  As a moderator you should know this, but perhaps you missed that class at Mod School so here you go, just in case you were unsure:

 troll noun [C] (COMPUTING)
 
someone who leaves an intentionally annoying or offensive message on the internet, in order to upset someone or to get attention or cause trouble

Oooh Er.  A few more of those spring to mind.  Especially if they are also Off Topic.

[G-Unit]

Are you setting me a trap?  Start a thread on trolls if you want to discuss further.  Meanwhile, to answer your question -  the posts obviously speak for themselves.   Talk of "owning" and "is everyone off searching for Maddie" are clearly designed to provoke (especially as they come out of the blue, after days of no posts on here at all).  As a moderator you should know this, but perhaps you missed that class at Mod School so here you go, just in case you were unsure:

 troll noun [C] (COMPUTING)
 
someone who leaves an intentionally annoying or offensive message on the internet, in order to upset someone or to get attention or cause trouble

I have seen nothing annoying or offensive. Who is annoyed or offended and why?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I have seen nothing annoying or offensive. Who is annoyed or offended and why?

Well you would say that wouldn’t you?  Clearly Eleanor found the remarks annoying or had you not noticed that either?

[faithlilly]

I have seen nothing annoying or offensive. Who is annoyed or offended and why?

Some make a career out of being annoyed and offended. For others life is full enough not to have to go looking for things that vex them.

[Eleanor]

Well you would say that wouldn’t you?  Clearly Eleanor found the remarks annoying or had you not noticed that either?

Annoying isn't quite the word.  But I do not see the point of a German article that we can't read unless we pay, unless it was to Goad.

[Eleanor]

Some make a career out of being annoyed and offended. For others life is full enough not to have to go looking for things that vex them.

I didn't find or post this half an article in German?  Gunit did that.  I can only wonder why.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Some make a career out of being annoyed and offended. For others life is full enough not to have to go looking for things that vex them.

How on earth did you find the time in your enormously full life to share the benefit of that wisdom (aka goady little post)?  We are so grateful, thank you.