Don't know,but this thread is not about the McCann's,try and stay on topic.
Did you intend your post to be insolent as well as inaccurate because in my opinion you have effortlessly attained both although I have chosen to give your ignorance the benefit of the doubt.
My post is not off topic although your reply might very well be.
My post draws the very marked comparison between the situation should the police be unable to lay charges against Brueckner because of lack of evidence and the contrary hypocritical situation contrived by sceptics regarding Madeleine’s parents.
SnipIf there is evidence to charge him ... he will be charged. If there is no evidence ... he won't be.
Please do remember there was no evidence against Madeleine's parents, and I see no sceptics suggesting that is because they "had nothing to do with it in the first place." Or am I missing something? http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11656.msg615322#msg615322It is known as debate ~ which is normal on a discussion forum.
Unfortunately your response shows only your inadequacy to take the debate any further or throw any light on the apparent propensity of sceptics to leap to the defence of the many faceted career criminal known as Brueckner … and their abominable behaviour with regard to Madeleine’s parents.
Without the untiring efforts of whom very likely there would be no debate regarding whether or not Brueckner will be charged leaving sceptics in freedom to do what I think sceptics do best.
With or without any involvement in Madeleine's case I think Brueckner may well end up as one of the more prolific European offenders any of us have heard about.
It seems that given the opportunity to do so, you are unwilling or unable to justify sceptic defence of a guy who already has a rap sheet second to none.