If Brueckner is Never Charged.

[Mr Gray]

you do like to repeat your little mantras quite regularly don’t you?

There's another mantra....the police know who did it and have strong evidence....just can't prove it at the moment

[pathfinder73]

There's another mantra....the police know who did it and have strong evidence....just can't prove it at the moment

If they had strong evidence CB would be questioned. You cannot prove anything without evidence but you're correct  the police know who did it. They've never had to bring that remaining lead into it when they've been eliminating all others. Luis Neves is in charge of the PJ and the Portuguese Supreme Court said it loud and clear.

[Vertigo Swirl]

If they had strong evidence CB would be questioned. You cannot prove anything without evidence but you're correct  the police know who did it. They've never had to bring that remaining lead into it when they've been eliminating all others. Luis Neves is in charge of the PJ and the Portuguese Supreme Court said it loud and clear.

Oh dear, another example of strange logic.  The police are first eliminating every person who was in the area that night before finally getting their teeth into the McCanns.  Won’t be long now!

[Mr Gray]

If they had strong evidence CB would be questioned. You cannot prove anything without evidence but you're correct  the police know who did it. They've never had to bring that remaining lead into it when they've been eliminating all others. Luis Neves is in charge of the PJ and the Portuguese Supreme Court said it loud and clear.

I understand your theory and I think it's total rubbish.
No police force has ever solved a crime by eliminating all possibilities and seeing what's left...it's a ridiculous idea

[Robittybob1]

I understand your theory and I think it's total rubbish.
No police force has ever solved a crime by eliminating all possibilities and seeing what's left...it's a ridiculous idea

That is rather a bold statement D.    "What's left" surely must be part of the equation.

[Eleanor]

That is rather a bold statement D.    "What's left" surely must be part of the equation.

Not when it involves every other slightly dodgy person.

[Robittybob1]

Not when it involves every other slightly dodgy person.

But if there is one that never gets eliminated, doesn't the focus come back to that one.   

[Mr Gray]

That is rather a bold statement D.    "What's left" surely must be part of the equation.

I said no police force has ever solved a crime by eliminating all the other possibilities....how would they know they have. Even if Breukner isnt charged that doesnt eliminate all other possibilities. Its path who is making very bold statements imo...t

[Mr Gray]

But if there is one that never gets eliminated, doesn't the focus come back to that one.

I would say that one has already been eliminated

[pathfinder73]

Oh dear, another example of strange logic.  The police are first eliminating every person who was in the area that night before finally getting their teeth into the McCanns.  Won’t be long now!

If you think they are waiting then think again 

[Eleanor]

But if there is one that never gets eliminated, doesn't the focus come back to that one.

Like Brueckner you mean?  Or do you mean The McCanns as did Pathfinder?

[Mr Gray]

If you think they are waiting then think again 

you are making a very big assumption taht CB will be eliminated  if he isnt charged

[Robittybob1]

Like Brueckner you mean?  Or do you mean The McCanns as did Pathfinder?

I wasn't thinking of any specific case.  Davel's statement was general in scope. He said "No police force has ever solved a crime by eliminating all possibilities and seeing what's left".   

[Mr Gray]

I wasn't thinking of any specific case.  Davel's statement was general in scope. He said "No police force has ever solved a crime by eliminating all possibilities and seeing what's left".   

how can  a police force eliminate all other possibilities...think about it. going into court and saying...we dont have any evidence but hes the only one left...its laughable..


Certainly in this case I dont see anyway Breukner can be eliminated.....unless proof points to someone else

[Robittybob1]

how can  a police force eliminate all other possibilities...think about it. going into court and saying...we dont have any evidence but hes the only one left...its laughable..


Certainly in this case i dont see anyway Breukner can be eliminated.....unless proof points to someone else

Did I say they would do that?    I was thinking the one left would get examined again before any court action.