Author Topic: Dianne Webster  (Read 14686 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Dianne Webster
« Reply #30 on: April 07, 2013, 10:48:05 PM »
Nope. I have already indicated what your reference says. Care to post the excerpt instead as there seems to be some confusion ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

debunker

  • Guest
Re: Dianne Webster
« Reply #31 on: April 08, 2013, 07:01:10 AM »
Nope. I have already indicated what your reference says. Care to post the excerpt instead as there seems to be some confusion ?

Can't quote from a pdf on this tablet.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Dianne Webster
« Reply #32 on: April 08, 2013, 11:20:17 AM »
Nope. I have already indicated what your reference says. Care to post the excerpt instead as there seems to be some confusion ?

Can't quote from a pdf on this tablet.

Then as soon as you have access to a PC I look forward to reading it.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

debunker

  • Guest
Re: Dianne Webster
« Reply #33 on: April 08, 2013, 11:42:06 AM »
Nope. I have already indicated what your reference says. Care to post the excerpt instead as there seems to be some confusion ?

Can't quote from a pdf on this tablet.

Then as soon as you have access to a PC I look forward to reading it.

It is in the box at the top ofpage 222. It describes instructions when evidence given at different times varies.