The anti McCanns are starting to call the UK Justice Forum a Pro site

[Eleanor]

Yep, me too.  But I don't fall out with him or insult him.  Thats the difference, you see.

Il est un animal dangereux, mordu, il mord retour

Really?

[Gildas]

It is a prediction I made yesterday beginn king tocome true.

WHen John lists the myths, the [ censored word] will decamp in angerand accusation.

I have to say,  threads like this,  and your comment above,  lends some credence to those who view this forum as nothing more than a platform from which anyone who questions the McCann's version of events will be vilified

If people  are staying away from the forum as a result,  then that is unfortunate,  and certainly  of no benefit to the UK Justice forum itself, which loses credibility as a consequence

I agree entirely with what you say, Icabodcrane.
I had decided not to post on this forum. When I read your post, I changed my mind, and resolved not to be frightened off.

[faithlilly]

It is a prediction I made yesterday beginn king tocome true.

WHen John lists the myths, the [ censored word] will decamp in angerand accusation.

I have to say,  threads like this,  and your comment above,  lends some credence to those who view this forum as nothing more than a platform from which anyone who questions the McCann's version of events will be vilified
If people  are staying away from the forum as a result,  then that is unfortunate,  and certainly  of no benefit to the UK Justice forum itself, which loses credibility as a consequence

I agree entirely with what you say, Icabodcrane.
I had decided not to post on this forum. When I read your post, I changed my mind, and resolved not to be frightened off.

Great to have you here 

[icabodcrane]

It is a prediction I made yesterday beginn king tocome true.

WHen John lists the myths, the [ censored word] will decamp in angerand accusation.

I have to say,  threads like this,  and your comment above,  lends some credence to those who view this forum as nothing more than a platform from which anyone who questions the McCann's version of events will be vilified

If people  are staying away from the forum as a result,  then that is unfortunate,  and certainly  of no benefit to the UK Justice forum itself, which loses credibility as a consequence

I agree entirely with what you say, Icabodcrane.
I had decided not to post on this forum. When I read your post, I changed my mind, and resolved not to be frightened off.

Glad to have you  join us Gildas

I know what you mean about being frightened off

There is an element here who's defensiveness of the McCanns borders on fanatical  and the aggressive  'us and them'  gang  mentality can be intimidating  and  feel like bullying

Stay firm,  and remember,   bullies should not be avoided  ...  they should be confronted

[debunker]

It is a prediction I made yesterday beginn king tocome true.

WHen John lists the myths, the [ censored word] will decamp in angerand accusation.

I have to say,  threads like this,  and your comment above,  lends some credence to those who view this forum as nothing more than a platform from which anyone who questions the McCann's version of events will be vilified.





If people  are staying away from the forum as a result,  then that is unfortunate,  and certainly  of no benefit to the UK Justice forum itself, which loses credibility as a consequence

I agree entirely with what you say, Icabodcrane.
I had decided not to post on this forum. When I read your post, I changed my mind, and resolved not to be frightened off.

Glad to have you  join us Gildas


I know what you mean about being frightened off

There is an element here who's defensiveness of the McCanns borders on fanatical  and the aggressive  'us and them'  gang  mentality can be intimidating  and  feel like bullying



Stay firm,  and remember,   bullies should not be avoided  ...  they should be confronted

Unless they are posting on an anti site, in whic case anyone not following the party line is banned as soon as they are identified.

NO wonder [ censored word] are shocked when forced to debate with others whodo not share their views.

[Gildas]

Thanks for the welcome!

[icabodcrane]

It is a prediction I made yesterday beginn king tocome true.

WHen John lists the myths, the [ censored word] will decamp in angerand accusation.

I have to say,  threads like this,  and your comment above,  lends some credence to those who view this forum as nothing more than a platform from which anyone who questions the McCann's version of events will be vilified.





If people  are staying away from the forum as a result,  then that is unfortunate,  and certainly  of no benefit to the UK Justice forum itself, which loses credibility as a consequence

I agree entirely with what you say, Icabodcrane.
I had decided not to post on this forum. When I read your post, I changed my mind, and resolved not to be frightened off.

Glad to have you  join us Gildas


I know what you mean about being frightened off

There is an element here who's defensiveness of the McCanns borders on fanatical  and the aggressive  'us and them'  gang  mentality can be intimidating  and  feel like bullying



Stay firm,  and remember,   bullies should not be avoided  ...  they should be confronted

Unless they are posting on an anti site, in whic case anyone not following the party line is banned as soon as they are identified.

NO wonder [ censored word] are shocked when forced to debate with others whodo not share their views.

"forced to debate"  ? 

...  shouldn't that be  'invited'  to debate ?

That's just the kind of bullying mentality I was talking about

[debunker]

By forced to debate means that they cannot depend on a biased mod with a ban button.

[C.Edwards]

ONce again you are asuming. Talk with Eleanor who will confirm that I have always been an awkw HRD bedfellow for the pros and have been banned from STM and .....2 for hav ing the wrong views.

And I got banned from Haverns and they hate me on STM too - what's your point?  You still label me a crazy [ censored word ] [ censored word ].  What does that say about your powers of deduction?