“A Laughable Story”

[Angelo222]

i have just read the judgement again. It says the mCcanns were not cleared by the archiving despatch,,,that was 2008. Therefore the SC were referring to the situation in 2008, 12 years ago...not now.

Rowley made it clear the mcCanns were not being investigating and he was happy their involvemnet had been dealt with...he regarded them as not being involved..cleared. obviously if new evidence comes to light things could change.

No where can I see the statement that the McCanns have not been proven innocent...i dont think the SC said that..if they did they should all be sacked.

I dont see anyone calling for CB to prove hes innocent. Thats a disgrace to justice and and any court making that statement is  adisgrace and not fit for purpose..imo

Your squirming again 

[Mr Gray]

Pedro da Carmo said the McCanns are not suspects and there no evidence against them....i think thats pretty clear

[Angelo222]

You can spin it any way you like but the McCanns claimed that they had been cleared and the Portuguese Supreme Court felt it necessary to state otherwise.

"HAVE NOT BEEN PROVED INNOCENT"

[Mr Gray]

"HAVE NOT BEEN PROVED INNOCENT"

Courts dont prove people innocent...I dont think the SC even said this..

But CB hasnt been proven innocent

[Angelo222]

Pedro da Carmo said the McCanns are not suspects and there no evidence against them....i think thats pretty clear

Don't you know by now that what these people say publicly and what they are really doing behind the scenes are often two very different things?  Rowley stated publicly that the Met were not being given a free hand in this investigation and are being thwarted by political interference. That says it all for me.

Anyhoo...work beckons...laters my dear.

[Mr Gray]

Don't you know by now that what these people say publicly and what they are really doing behind the scenes are often two very different things?  Rowley stated publicly that the Met were not being given a free hand in this investigation and are being thwarted by political interference. That says it all for me.

Anyhoo...work beckons...laters my dear.

Rowley NEVER said that...more sceptivc untruths

Try and stick to the facts...the SC never said the Mccanns hadnt been proven innocent either...you should realise by now not to believe what you read in the papers

[Vertigo Swirl]

A stupid question.  Since they haven't been cleared of involvement by the very country in which the missing kid disappeared and since they haven't managed to pin it on some unfortunate German paedophile or some dead guy from the Azores then this case is still wide open imo.

Are the McCanns currently under investigation then?  A yes or no without the insult will do just fine.

[Vertigo Swirl]

"HAVE NOT BEEN PROVED INNOCENT"

Please supply the source document cite.

[Mr Gray]

the mail sums it up..

Judges made it clear in their decision their job was not to decide whether the McCanns bore any criminal responsibility over their daughter's disappearance and it would be wrong for anyone to draw any inferences about the couple's guilt or innocence from their ruling.

But they added: 'It should not be said that the appellants were cleared via the ruling announcing the archiving of the criminal case.

So I'm right yet again...the SC said they were not cleared by the archiving despatch...never said they had not been proved innocent...and if their statement is seen in context it has  a different meaning.

[kizzy]

Courts dont prove people innocent...I dont think the SC even said this..

But CB hasnt been proven innocent

No wonder they call this the laughable thread.

[Mr Gray]

No wonder they call this the laughable thread.

I agree it's laughable ...that's why I posted it..
CB is a suspect...he will never be declared innocent

[The General]

I agree it's laughable ...that's why I posted it..
CB is a suspect...he will never be declared innocent

Everyone's a suspect until they're not.

[kizzy]

I don't consider the McCanns opinion of what happened to Madeleine in any way relevant.  If they had both dropped dead that night of shock or grief without uttering a word I would still be of the opinion that Madeleine had been abducted.  Why do you and your fellow mirth-seekers find that so laughable?

Did you see the pictures a few days later on Maddie's birthday?

wonder what the mccs found so laughable you will no the ones I mean VS

[kizzy]

I agree it's laughable ...that's why I posted it..
CB is a suspect...he will never be declared innocent

Seems neither will the mccs.

[Mr Gray]

Everyone's a suspect until they're not.

The McCanns are not