Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Robittybob1]

I thought it was King Solomon. Pride goes before destruction, and haughtiness before a fall. – Proverbs 16:18

I didn't know that.

[Robittybob1]

I don't think it's about winning.

It's more for me about what you believe to be true.

I have said before if I believed the mccs were innocent I wouldn't be on any of the threads.

I wouldn't see the point.

What no justice for Madeleine!

[Robittybob1]

From everything Wolters has said I'm fairly sure he knows exactly how Madeleine died.... And has the evidence to support it.

I'd take a bet it was Davel saying that! 

[kizzy]

From everything Wolters has said I'm fairly sure he knows exactly how Madeleine died.... And has the evidence to support it.

I'm fairly sure he knows exactly how Madeleine died.... And has the evidence to support it.

Im fairly sure your post is rubbish IMO - too many eggs in one basket


So in his own time no rush.

Yet if that's the case looking from your view and others who are outraged what GA put the mccs through.

What wolt is doing is basically telling the mccs Maddie was murdered by a peodo imo .

Yet is in no immediate rush to question or charge CB.

[Mr Gray]

I'm fairly sure he knows exactly how Madeleine died.... And has the evidence to support it.

Im fairly sure your post is rubbish IMO - too many eggs in one basket


So in his own time no rush.

Yet if that's the case looking from your view and others who are outraged what GA put the mccs through.

What wolt is doing is basically telling the mccs Maddie was murdered by a peodo imo .

Yet is in no immediate rush to question or charge CB.

I'm sure he wouldn't be saying something so awful unless it was true

[Erngath]

I'm sure he wouldn't be saying something so awful unless it was true

Sadly I agree.

[G-Unit]

I'm sure he wouldn't be saying something so awful unless it was true

That would be unprofessional and unforgivable, wouldn't it? IMO

[Erngath]

That would be unprofessional and unforgivable, wouldn't it? IMO

it would.

[barrier]

You need to differentiate between the evidence Maddie is dead and the evidence CB did it

You back tracking ?

[Mr Gray]

You back tracking ?

Not in the slightest.

[Mr Gray]

That would be unprofessional and unforgivable, wouldn't it? IMO

It absolutely would and I don't see how he would say such a thing if he didn't know it to be true

[barrier]

It absolutely would and I don't see how he would say such a thing if he didn't know it to be true

Yet Amaral said the same and he's the devil incarnate, go figure, neither one can prove it.

[Holly Goodhead]

Yet Amaral said the same and he's the devil incarnate, go figure, neither one can prove it.

And we have CB's defence lawyer saying 'Brits will fall off their chair' when he reveals the evidence he says he found that clears his client!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8757067/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckners-lawyer-says-evidence-clears-client.html

[Vertigo Swirl]

And we have CB's defence lawyer saying 'Brits will fall off their chair' when he reveals the evidence he says he found that clears his client!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8757067/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckners-lawyer-says-evidence-clears-client.html

What’s he waiting for I wonder...?

[Holly Goodhead]

It absolutely would and I don't see how he would say such a thing if he didn't know it to be true

And why would CB's defence lawyer say the following if untrue:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8757067/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckners-lawyer-says-evidence-clears-client.html