Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[sadie]

Actually, what happened was that Amaral won the right to write any old bollocks in a bestselling book, because in Portugal his rights to "free speech" outweigh the rights of those not to be lied about in a bestselling book.

Awful to any fair minded people.   And, of course, in PT it seems that the more important you are, the more that you can get away with these injustices.

Self important, pumped up little people IMO. 

[Mr Gray]

What makes you so certain he is wrong?

Because of the evidence

Calpol isn't a, sedative
No confirmation of the dog alerts
Dna proved nothing
Children don't die falling off the sofa... And much more

[kizzy]

So Eddie found a body under a, paving stone in Jersey... The dogs have 100% record... Have helped solve 200 cases... Non of that is true

Have I said it was?.....What i will say is best form of deffence is attack like u always seem to do

[kizzy]

IIRC  a number of reports which have never been contradicted, while hundreds of people, including staff of Mark Warners and many local people, searched the area around the Ocean Club apartments for hours after Maddie went missing,

not one of the mccs friends, ’, bothered to do so. They all went to bed that night....Incuding the mccs.

[Mr Gray]

Have I said it was?.....What i will say is best form of deffence is attack like u always seem to do

you said there were no lies in the book

[Mr Gray]

IIRC  a number of reports which have never been contradicted, while hundreds of people, including staff of Mark Warners and many local people, searched the area around the Ocean Club apartments for hours after Maddie went missing,

not one of the mccs friends, ’, bothered to do so. They all went to bed that night....Incuding the mccs.

you do post some absolute tripe..imo

[kizzy]

you do post some absolute tripe..imo

Yes so you keep saying.....but who are you to judge that it is tripe

Mcs number one supporter...anything against them you continually try and rubbish it... at a moments notice.

Disregarding everything with no proof you are right.

[Mr Gray]

Yes so you keep saying.....but who are you to judge that it is tripe

Mcs number one supporter...anything against them you continually try and rubbish it... at a moments notice.

Disregarding everything with no proof you are right.

What you are posting is years old.... And tripe imo because none if it is supported by any real evidence... Thats what counts

[kizzy]

What you are posting is years old.... And tripe imo because none if it is supported by any real evidence... Thats what counts

IMO the real truth of what happened to maddie should go back to 13 years ago.

why do you think M3 wer employed if it wasnt to discredit GA, they were paid thousands from the fund that was suppose to be looking for Maddie.


The McCanns then went on to hire a very dubious Spanish ‘detective agency’ - Metodo 3 - at cost of several hundred thousand pounds, all for no obvious benefit or results. Once again, this firm of private investigators had no known track record in finding missing children. On the contrary, they were much better known for their expertise in the fields of money laundering and fraud.

It is reported that the final bill for Metodo 3's work could be anywhere between £300,000 and £750,000 - but what were they doing for nearly two months before the McCanns announced that they had been hired?

https://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id76.htm

[kizzy]

Why did they need lawyers so early on ......lawyers wouldn't be looking for Maddie.


It has been widely reported - and not denied - that a ‘team of lawyers’ flew out from Leicestershire within 48 hours of Madeleine being reported missing, possibly the very next day. How several lawyers could help find an abducted child has never been explained. Nor has it been explained who asked these lawyers to fly out to Praia da Luz and who paid for them.

11 May 2007
Lawyers fly in / 'No stone unturned' mentioned for first time

Portuguese newspapers report that this is the day lawyers flew into Portugal and met with the McCanns at the Ocean Club.

Extract:

English lawyers in Lagos

However, it is known to DN, that two British lawyers arrived Friday afternoon at The Ocean Club resort, and were staying there to advise the parents of Madeleine in this process. A situation that arises hours after the last presence of the parents with the PJ in Portimão, where they were interviewed for the second time, for long hours.

Although the PJ reiterate that the relatives and friends of Madeleine "do not fall under any suspicion," the presence of lawyers is nevertheless a curious fact, at a time when there is talk of a possible return to the United Kingdom by the couple. According to the PJ, there is no legal obligation to prevent the family and friends from leaving the country at this stage, since "nobody has been made an arguido".


https://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id58.htm

[The General]

Why did they need lawyers so early on ......lawyers wouldn't be looking for Maddie.


It has been widely reported - and not denied - that a ‘team of lawyers’ flew out from Leicestershire within 48 hours of Madeleine being reported missing, possibly the very next day. How several lawyers could help find an abducted child has never been explained. Nor has it been explained who asked these lawyers to fly out to Praia da Luz and who paid for them.

11 May 2007
Lawyers fly in / 'No stone unturned' mentioned for first time

Portuguese newspapers report that this is the day lawyers flew into Portugal and met with the McCanns at the Ocean Club.

Extract:

English lawyers in Lagos

However, it is known to DN, that two British lawyers arrived Friday afternoon at The Ocean Club resort, and were staying there to advise the parents of Madeleine in this process. A situation that arises hours after the last presence of the parents with the PJ in Portimão, where they were interviewed for the second time, for long hours.

Although the PJ reiterate that the relatives and friends of Madeleine "do not fall under any suspicion," the presence of lawyers is nevertheless a curious fact, at a time when there is talk of a possible return to the United Kingdom by the couple. According to the PJ, there is no legal obligation to prevent the family and friends from leaving the country at this stage, since "nobody has been made an arguido".

It wasn't for an outstanding way leave or planning issue in Rothley in regard to the impingement on privacy pertaining to a neighbour's proposed garage conversion / development of the roof space, incorporating Velux windows to two elevations; but more likely it was to look at the legal implications for potential exposure to child neglect charges.

[kizzy]

Shortly after that, the McCanns had got sufficient funds organised to afford top lawyers in both Britain and Portugal. Again, how lawyers could help to ‘find Madeleine’ is not clear.

It seems When the McCanns were about to made suspects in the investigation of Maddies disappearance, they rushed to hire the Uk top extradition lawyer, Michael Caplan Q.C.,

IMO, as well as ohers ‘innocent’ parents would not need a team of lawyers out with them within 48 hours, nor would they need Britain’s top extradition lawyers. If they had done nothing wrong,

[The General]

Shortly after that, the McCanns had got sufficient funds organised to afford top lawyers in both Britain and Portugal. Again, how lawyers could help to ‘find Madeleine’ is not clear.

It seems When the McCanns were about to made suspects in the investigation of Maddies disappearance, they rushed to hire the Uk top extradition lawyer, Michael Caplan Q.C.,

IMO, as well as ohers ‘innocent’ parents would not need a team of lawyers out with them within 48 hours, nor would they need Britain’s top extradition lawyers. If they had done nothing wrong,

There would appear to be a certain amount of keck cackage going on there to go to such lengths.
Who knows how one would react in such a situation, but I'd like to think I'd be searching for my daughter and not an extradition lawyer - I wouldn't care much about what happened to me personally. (Besides, extradition is just a free flight home)

[sadie]

Why did they need lawyers so early on ......lawyers wouldn't be looking for Maddie.


It has been widely reported - and not denied - that a ‘team of lawyers’ flew out from Leicestershire within 48 hours of Madeleine being reported missing, possibly the very next day. How several lawyers could help find an abducted child has never been explained. Nor has it been explained who asked these lawyers to fly out to Praia da Luz and who paid for them.

11 May 2007
Lawyers fly in / 'No stone unturned' mentioned for first time

Portuguese newspapers report that this is the day lawyers flew into Portugal and met with the McCanns at the Ocean Club.

Extract:

English lawyers in Lagos

However, it is known to DN, that two British lawyers arrived Friday afternoon at The Ocean Club resort, and were staying there to advise the parents of Madeleine in this process. A situation that arises hours after the last presence of the parents with the PJ in Portimão, where they were interviewed for the second time, for long hours.

Although the PJ reiterate that the relatives and friends of Madeleine "do not fall under any suspicion," the presence of lawyers is nevertheless a curious fact, at a time when there is talk of a possible return to the United Kingdom by the couple. According to the PJ, there is no legal obligation to prevent the family and friends from leaving the country at this stage, since "nobody has been made an arguido".


https://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id58.htm

They probably had been advised to get the best British  Lawyers 'cause the Consulate would know about what happened to Michael Cook (extreme torture) and to Leonor and Joao Cipriano (also extreme torture).  Both parties were jailed for long periods with no actual evidence, except tortured out confessions. 

Oh, Amaral and Cristavao cobbled some stuff together, but there was NO ACTUAL evidence in either case.


Very wise of the Mccanns to act so early.

[sadie]

It wasn't for an outstanding way leave or planning issue in Rothley in regard to the impingement on privacy pertaining to a neighbour's proposed garage conversion / development of the roof space, incorporating Velux windows to two elevations; but more likely it was to look at the legal implications for potential exposure to child neglect charges.

Sorry, but what a load of BS.

No child neglect there.  They were on Ocean Club premises, within sight of 5A and only 50 metres away crow flies.  And 70+ metres away walking running if needed.  Also checking at more regular intervals than half hourly ones.    Much better than Butlins who had a cyclist ride round at intervals, listening at the window/door

It was like us being in our then back garden, chatting to our neighbours over the fence.
Just like someone on a camping/caravaning  site may be chatting/having a barby  with their neighbours 50 metres away

Nobody, I repeat nobody, could anticipate what happened to Madeleine THEN.   After Madeleine is a different scenario.

Perhaps your understanding will increase and you will mellow with age and life experience.   Do hope so.