Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Vertigo Swirl]

It's opinion that the McCanns were denied their right to the presumption of innocence, not a proven fact in any court.

So they were both presumed innocent but not proven innocent, is that it?

[faithlilly]

We know there is no real evidence  against the parents... We know some of the evidence against breukner

What is the evidence against Brueckner ?

He was in PDL on 3rd of May. Parents, check.
He made a photo call to a friend. Parents, check.

What else ?

[Eleanor]

The problem is that we know the evidence against that parents, we have no idea what ties Brueckner to the case and after nearly four months Wolter doesn’t appear too keen on sharing.

So that makes it alright to convict The McCanns?  Sheesh, and you wonder why I despair.

Who are you people?

[faithlilly]

So that makes it alright to convict The McCanns?  Sheesh, and you wonder why I despair.

Who are you people?

Convict or question their innocence? There is a difference.

[Mr Gray]

What is the evidence against Brueckner ?

He was in PDL on 3rd of May. Parents, check.
He made a photo call to a friend. Parents, check.

What else ?

HCW says there is enough evidence  to show he killed maddie

[faithlilly]

HCW says there is enough evidence  to shoe he killed maddie

Yawn.

[Eleanor]

It's opinion that the McCanns were denied their right to the presumption of innocence, not a proven fact in any court.

Are you serious?  It never went to any court.  The McCanns have been deprived of their Right to Innocence on this Forum alone.

But you crack on.  You have shocked me.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Why, when summarising the evidence against Bruckner, do sceptics always overlook his criminal history?  His convictions for burglary and rape within PdL itself, not to mention his child abuse convictions ?  It’s almost as if they think these are entirely irrelevant.

[Eleanor]

Convict or question their innocence? There is a difference.

I don't have any great problem with you, but I do sometimes question your common sense and Logic.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't have any great problem with you, but I do sometimes question your common sense and Logic.

It seems it’s ok to question the McCanns innocence (though the experienced professionals aren’t), but we must not question dear old CB’s innocence (even though the experienced professionals have him as their chief suspect).  That makes perfect sense I’m sure.

[faithlilly]

I don't have any great problem with you, but I do sometimes question your common sense and Logic.

As I do yours, which is odd because I know you aren’t stupid...trusting perhaps ?

[Eleanor]

Why, when summarising the evidence against Bruckner, do sceptics always overlook his criminal history?  His convictions for burglary and rape within PdL itself, not to mention his child abuse convictions ?  It’s almost as if they think these are entirely irrelevant.

Well, they are, aren't they.  They would rather afford Brueckner rights that they wouldn't give to The McCanns.

It isn't actually important anyway.  Brueckner is in prison for quite some time, while The McCanns are not.

Guess what, Y'All.  The McCanns have never been convicted of anything.

[Mr Gray]

Well, they are, aren't they.  They would rather afford Brueckner rights that they wouldn't give to The McCanns.

It isn't actually important anyway.  Brueckner is in prison for quite some time, while The McCanns are not.

Guess what, Y'All.  The McCanns have never been convicted of anything.

and could relatively soon be proven innocent

[Eleanor]

It seems it’s ok to question the McCanns innocence (though the experienced professionals aren’t), but we must not question dear old CB’s innocence (even though the experienced professionals have him as their chief suspect).  That makes perfect sense I’m sure.

Don't worry about it, V.  It will all come to something in the end.  It's just taking a bit longer than first I thought.

[Mr Gray]

the nexy six months or so could see a result at the ECHR and the conviction of CB....what a situation that would be.