Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 358628 times)

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #255 on: September 19, 2020, 07:47:29 PM »
Are you serious?  It never went to any court.  The McCanns have been deprived of their Right to Innocence on this Forum alone.

But you crack on.  You have shocked me.  I thought that you were really alright.  But I have dealt with worse than you on many occasions.

You are still expressing your opinion, not a fact.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #256 on: September 19, 2020, 07:51:15 PM »
You are still expressing your opinion, not a fact.

Perhaps you or another sceptic could tell us what they think is the circumstantial evidence against the McCanns... I don't see there is any

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #257 on: September 19, 2020, 07:54:15 PM »
In last night’s Sexta9 program, Mr Wolters categorically states that the McCanns are not suspects in Madeleine’s disappearance.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #258 on: September 19, 2020, 07:55:24 PM »
As I do yours, which is odd because I know you aren’t stupid...trusting perhaps ?

I am the most logical person that I have ever known. You get born like this.  You don't learn it.  And if you haven't got it then you never will have.

Stupid is another thing altogether, as is trusting, of which I might be either, but these two could take the edge of my very boring Logic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #259 on: September 19, 2020, 08:03:31 PM »
and could relatively soon be proven innocent

Well, I hope so.  But I don't think I am much going to like the outcome.  Too many years of hoping.

But this is not my child. And so it cannot matter as much to me.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #260 on: September 19, 2020, 08:08:39 PM »
You are still expressing your opinion, not a fact.

Oh, did it go to Court?  I must have missed that.  Where else in did I state any Fact?

Or was it just my opinion of you?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #261 on: September 19, 2020, 08:11:22 PM »
A post on topic...I dont see there is any real circumstantial evidence against the McCanns ...

and when asked no poster has been able to come up with any

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #262 on: September 19, 2020, 08:15:28 PM »
These are some extracts for information, from the Sexta9 broadcast:

In 2007 Brückner’s former girlfriend, Nicole Fehlinger had connections with rich Russians and she sold her husband's (Roman) yachts to them.
Brückner bought the packaging/box factory in Germany for Euro36.000, just after the Euro100.000 robbery at Gale in Portugal and he paid in cash.
Nicole Fehlinger lived with Brückner at the Hanover property in 2007, which was recently searched. A neighbour has confirmed this.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #263 on: September 19, 2020, 08:16:02 PM »
A post on topic...I dont see there is any real circumstantial evidence against the McCanns ...

and when asked no poster has been able to come up with any

There is none.  That is why.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #264 on: September 19, 2020, 08:21:05 PM »
These are some extracts for information, from the Sexta9 broadcast:

In 2007 Brückner’s former girlfriend, Nicole Fehlinger had connections with rich Russians and she sold her husband's (Roman) yachts to them.
Brückner bought the packaging/box factory in Germany for Euro36.000, just after the Euro100.000 robbery at Gale in Portugal and he paid in cash.
Nicole Fehlinger lived with Brückner at the Hanover property in 2007, which was recently searched. A neighbour has confirmed this.

Must be him wot dunnit then, bypass the courts,  hang the fecker.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #265 on: September 19, 2020, 08:24:52 PM »
Must be him wot dunnit then, bypass the courts,  hang the fecker.

This is not the way in which things are done today.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #266 on: September 19, 2020, 08:27:48 PM »
This is not the way in which things are done today.

Mores the pity.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #267 on: September 19, 2020, 08:31:57 PM »
Must be him wot dunnit then, bypass the courts,  hang the fecker.
Idiotic post, imo.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #268 on: September 19, 2020, 08:39:47 PM »
Mores the pity.

God preserves us.  What an idiot.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #269 on: September 19, 2020, 08:40:41 PM »
God preserves us.  What an idiot.

I like to keep the same company. ?>)()<
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.