« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 224   Go Down

Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 357651 times)

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #315 on: September 20, 2020, 07:19:25 PM »
Quote from: Davel on September 20, 2020, 07:17:04 PM
I don't think it relies on a confession ..but I think he's the one... And the last lead... So yes OG will wrap it up. Imo

Where do you see the vital piece emerging from then, imo forensics are a no no.
Logged
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #316 on: September 20, 2020, 07:21:40 PM »
Quote from: Davel on September 20, 2020, 01:51:59 PM
I would have to check but I think confirmed is the word used
Used by whom?
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #317 on: September 20, 2020, 07:24:37 PM »
Quote from: Davel on September 20, 2020, 07:17:04 PM
I don't think it relies on a confession ..but I think he's the one... And the last lead... So yes OG will wrap it up. Imo

The worst of all worlds for the parents.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #318 on: September 20, 2020, 07:31:21 PM »
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #319 on: September 20, 2020, 07:36:50 PM »
Quote from: faithlilly on September 20, 2020, 07:24:37 PM
The worst of all worlds for the parents.

in your opinion
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #320 on: September 20, 2020, 07:44:25 PM »
Quote from: Davel on September 20, 2020, 07:31:21 PM
The archiving report...
You said "I would have to check but I think confirmed is the word used", so did you check The archiving report?
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #321 on: September 20, 2020, 07:45:33 PM »
Quote from: Davel on September 20, 2020, 07:36:50 PM
in your opinion
And in the opinion of a lot of others.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #322 on: September 20, 2020, 07:46:40 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on September 20, 2020, 07:45:33 PM
And in the opinion of a lot of others.

So the post should have an...IMO
Logged

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #323 on: September 20, 2020, 07:52:33 PM »

@Davel

Quote from: barrier on September 20, 2020, 07:19:25 PM
Where do you see the vital piece emerging from then, imo forensics are a no no.
Logged
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #324 on: September 20, 2020, 07:56:42 PM »
Quote from: barrier on September 20, 2020, 07:52:33 PM
@Davel

could be an image on a memory stick. I think HCW is quite cleverly building a case on circumstantial evidence. Again...if CB disappeared off the rdar on 3 rd may...and was absent for several days....and cannot account for his movements ...thats quite powerful evidence
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #325 on: September 20, 2020, 08:04:04 PM »
Quote from: Davel on September 20, 2020, 07:47:29 PM
how many....in your opinion.
Me as well.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #326 on: September 20, 2020, 08:04:25 PM »
Quote from: Davel on September 20, 2020, 07:56:42 PM
could be an image on a memory stick. I think HCW is quite cleverly building a case on circumstantial evidence. Again...if CB disappeared off the rdar on 3 rd may...and was absent for several days....and cannot account for his movements ...thats quite powerful evidence

He's a drifter, going off radar is not a crime nor unusual,he was not seen exiting 5a with Madeleine.
Logged
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #327 on: September 20, 2020, 08:05:53 PM »
Quote from: Davel on September 20, 2020, 07:47:57 PM
read back and you will see
READ THIS THREAD?  Or do you mean theArchiving Report.   
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #328 on: September 20, 2020, 08:06:55 PM »
Quote from: Davel on September 20, 2020, 02:08:46 PM
not true as I well know....I know you are talking absolute codswallop
its very true....

To this can be added that, in reality, none of the indications that led to their constitution as arguidos was later confirmed or consolidated.

Its your post that isnt true....and not  a mention of an imo
Bumped for Robbitybob
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #329 on: September 20, 2020, 08:10:04 PM »
Quote from: Davel on September 20, 2020, 07:36:50 PM
in your opinion

Then explain to me in what way the closing down of OG would be good for the parents?
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 224   Go Up
« previous next »