Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Angelo222]

Are you serious?  It never went to any court.  The McCanns have been deprived of their Right to Innocence on this Forum alone.

But you crack on.  You have shocked me.

They're certainly not innocent imo. They were up to their necks in the conspiracy to undermine Amaral.

[Vertigo Swirl]

They're certainly not innocent imo. They were up to their necks in the conspiracy to undermine Amaral.

Libellous surely?

[Brietta]

They're certainly not innocent imo. They were up to their necks in the conspiracy to undermine Amaral.

In my opinion the various conspiracies alleged by Amaral were very firmly the products of his very fertile imagination.

Not one of his allegations against Madeleine's parents withstood scrutiny in the light of day. 

In stark contrast to the Amaral investigation, the Germans for example do not have to have recourse to making it up as they go along with regard to their prime suspect, much of their evidence is a matter of record and collection of the rest is a work in progress.

[Wonderfulspam]

So many years have elapsed since Madeleine disappeared and in spite of the current Investigations by three police forces and none of them seem to have them as suspects what does keep you convinced that Madeleine's parents were involved in her disappearance?

In my opinion Madeleine died in the holiday apartment.

[G-Unit]

In my opinion the various conspiracies alleged by Amaral were very firmly the products of his very fertile imagination.

Not one of his allegations against Madeleine's parents withstood scrutiny in the light of day. 

In stark contrast to the Amaral investigation, the Germans for example do not have to have recourse to making it up as they go along with regard to their prime suspect, much of their evidence is a matter of record and collection of the rest is a work in progress.

The first investigators, led by the public prosecutor, Encarnacao, Neves, Amaral and Rebelo were unable to gather enough evidence to charge the McCanns, but they had enough to suspect them.

The German investigators are reluctant to share their evidence and media stories don't amount to reliable records imo. Very little of their evidence is known.

[Erngath]

*Died in the holiday apartment.

Is tampering with my post allowed under forum rules?
Why not just answer it properly.
If you can!

[G-Unit]

Is tampering with my post allowed under forum rules?
Why not just answer it properly.
If you can!

I don't know what the rules are on this, perhaps you could raise the matter on the appropriate thread. In my opinion both posts are stating opinion as fact.

The topic of this thread is "Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB"

[Mr Gray]

The first investigators, led by the public prosecutor, Encarnacao, Neves, Amaral and Rebelo were unable to gather enough evidence to charge the McCanns, but they had enough to suspect them.

The German investigators are reluctant to share their evidence and media stories don't amount to reliable records imo. Very little of their evidence is known.

According  to the archiving report non of the evidence used to make them suspects was later confirmed  or consolidated... So they didn't have evidence.

Pedro DA Carmo... No evidence

SY... Parents ruled out

Wolters. ..no perental involvement based on the evidence

That seems pretty clear..


So I will ask you directly..

What is the evidence you think implicates the parents

[Erngath]

I don't know what the rules are on this, perhaps you could raise the matter on the appropriate thread. In my opinion both posts are stating opinion as fact.

The topic of this thread is "Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB"

Opinion stated as fact is an everyday occurrence on many threads.

[Erngath]

According  to the archiving report non of the evidence used to make them suspects was later confirmed  or consolidated... So they didn't have evidence.

Pedro DA Carmo... No evidence

SY... Parents ruled out

Wolters. ..no perental involvement based on the evidence

That seems pretty clear..


So I will ask you directly..

What is the evidence you think implicates the parents

Your final question is similar to the one I asked Kizzy.
I hope you have more luck obtaining.an answer than I did.

[The General]

Your final question is similar to the one I asked Kizzy.
I hope you have more luck obtaining.an answer than I did.

The question needs looking at.
It should be more '.....list the incongruencies derived from the investigation(s) and the facts that pertain specifically to the McCann's account(s) and that of their fellow holidaymakers - to wit the T7'

[G-Unit]

Opinion stated as fact is an everyday occurrence on many threads.

If you have concerns about forum rules here is a link;

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=4.0

[Mr Gray]

The question needs looking at.
It should be more '.....list the incongruencies derived from the investigation(s) and the facts that pertain specifically to the McCann's account(s) and that of their fellow holidaymakers - to wit the T7'

Well list them

[G-Unit]

According  to the archiving report non of the evidence used to make them suspects was later confirmed  or consolidated... So they didn't have evidence.

Pedro DA Carmo... No evidence

SY... Parents ruled out

Wolters. ..no perental involvement based on the evidence

That seems pretty clear..


So I will ask you directly..

What is the evidence you think implicates the parents

I have never claimed that there is evidence which implicates the parents.

[Erngath]

If you have concerns about forum rules here is a link;

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=4.0

My concern was whether WS was allowed to tamper with my post.
You said you didn't know.
Perhaps in your role as a Moderator it is you who should find out the answer.